Florida Statute 315.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXII
PORTS AND HARBORS

Chapter 315
PORT FACILITIES FINANCING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 315.07

315.07 Contracts for borrowing of money.—The governing body may contract with any person, firm, corporation or public body or with the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof for the borrowing of money for paying all or any part of the cost of any one or more port facilities, and any such contract may contain such terms, conditions or provisions as the governing body may determine not in conflict with the provisions of this law. The provisions of s. 315.06 applicable to bonds shall be applicable also to contracts entered into under the above provisions of this section. Any such contract may be hypothecated by the unit, and the unit may borrow money under such terms and conditions as it shall determine in anticipation of the receipt of funds under such contract.

History.—s. 7, ch. 59-411.

F.S. 315.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 315.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 315.07

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 315.07

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 315.07.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 315.07

Total Results: 16

Claire's Boutiques, Inc. v. Locastro

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-04-25

Citation: 85 So. 3d 1192, 2012 WL 1414117, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6498

Snippet: (citing Edwards v. Miami Transit Co., 150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440, 442 (1942)). Likewise, I will not assume

Bell Care Nurses Registry, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-11-12

Citation: 25 So. 3d 13, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837, 2009 WL 3763182

Snippet: 1998)(quoting Edwards v. Miami Transit Co., 150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440, 442 (1942) (quoting Atlantic Coast Line

Rotemi Realty, Inc. v. Act Realty Co., Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-07-07

Citation: 911 So. 2d 1181, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 528, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1461, 2005 WL 1578184

Snippet: first was Edwards v. Miami Transit Co.,150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440 (1942), in which a transit company entered

Carpenter v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-26

Citation: 870 So. 2d 955, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5657, 2004 WL 875108

Snippet: which reflected a maximum permissible sentence of 315.7 months. Our review of the record reveals that the

ACT REALTY, CO., INC. v. Rotemi Realty, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-08-20

Citation: 863 So. 2d 334, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12375, 2003 WL 21976079

Snippet: R. 196. Edwards v. Miami Transit Co., 150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440 (1942). The record in this case is devoid

Umbel v. Foodtrader.com, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-15

Citation: 820 So. 2d 372, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6589, 2002 WL 985161

Snippet: 4th DCA 1998); Edwards v. Miami Transit, 150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440 (1942). However, where, as here, the

Harris v. Gonzalez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-06-06

Citation: 789 So. 2d 405, 2001 WL 608969

Snippet: 1998)(quoting Edwards v. Miami Transit Co., 150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440, 442 (1942)(quoting Atlantic Coast Line

Neiman v. Galloway

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-01-21

Citation: 704 So. 2d 1131, 1998 WL 17422

Snippet: society.'" Edwards v. Miami Transit Co., 150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440, 442 (1942) (quoting Atlantic Coast Line

Coleman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-11-04

Citation: 515 So. 2d 313, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2555

Snippet: not an element of Murder of the Second Degree. *315 7. There was an excessive use of force and torture

Suntogs of Miami, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-05-31

Citation: 433 So. 2d 581, 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 557

Snippet: See, e.g., Edwards v. Miami Transit Co., 150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440 (1942); Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary

In re Estate of Yanowsky

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-30

Citation: 384 So. 2d 1297, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16242

Snippet: of registration is coownership form. 31 C.F.R. § 315.7. Finally, Section 315.20 provides in pertinent part:

Morgan v. McLaughlin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-04-21

Citation: 260 So. 2d 890, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7040

Snippet: 112, 71 N.E. 748. . N. 4 supra. . 31 C.F.R. § 315.7. . Fla.Stat. § 665.271 (1969), F.S.A. . Fla

Town of Belleair v. Moran

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-02-19

Citation: 244 So. 2d 532

Snippet: St. Petersburg v. Aikin, (Fla. 1968), 217 So.2d 315. [7] Cf., Hillsborough County v. Twin Lakes Mobile

Bursten v. Green

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-01-08

Citation: 172 So. 2d 472

Snippet: Chunghai Chan, 1959, 25 Misc.2d 312, 204 N.Y.S.2d 315; 7 C.J.S. Attorney and Client § 105; Annot., supra

Robert Company, Inc. v. Mortland

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1948-02-06

Citation: 33 So. 2d 732, 160 Fla. 125, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 624

Snippet: and proven. Edwards v. Miami Transit Co.150 Fla. 315, 7 So.2d 440; Givens v. Vaughin-Griffin Packing Co

Wechsler v. Novak

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1946-07-12

Citation: 26 So. 2d 884, 157 Fla. 703, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 833

Snippet: case of Edwards v. Miami Transit Co., 150 Fla. 315,7 So.2d 440, involved a written agreement whereby