Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 316.83 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 316.83 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 316.83 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 316.83

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 316
STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 316.83
316.83 Autonomous vehicle grading standards for roads on State Highway System.The Department of Transportation shall coordinate with federal, regional, and local partners, as well as industry representatives, to establish standards by which roads on the State Highway System shall be graded according to their compatibility with the operation of autonomous vehicles. In establishing such standards, the department shall consider factors including, but not limited to, the structural adequacy and safety of each road and the particular challenges that the overall driving environment of each road may present to a fully autonomous vehicle operating with the automated driving system engaged. Autonomous vehicle grading standards established pursuant to this section shall be incorporated into standards for transportation projects involving the construction of new roads or maintenance of existing roads on the State Highway System.
History.s. 3, ch. 2023-197.

F.S. 316.83 on Google Scholar

F.S. 316.83 on CourtListener

Amendments to 316.83


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 316.83

Total Results: 15

Parker v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc.

835 F.3d 1363, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16142, 2016 WL 4542719

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 2016 | Docket: 65662022

Cited 13 times | Published

Program (the “Wandall Act”), Florida Statutes § 316.0083. The Wandall Act authorizes the use of red-light

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Gonzalez

134 So. 3d 1119, 2014 WL 444171, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2014 | Docket: 60239036

Cited 3 times | Published

unconstitutional.1 We reverse and hold that section 316.0083(l)(e)l.c., Florida Statutes (2011), does not

City of Fort Lauderdale v. June Dhar

185 So. 3d 1232, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 61, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 393, 2016 WL 743287

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2016 | Docket: 3039160

Cited 2 times | Published

decision, the district court held a provision in section 316.0083(1)(d)3., Florida Statutes (2012), known as

Steven J. Pincus v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 17, 2022 | Docket: 63032388

Published

infraction detector” under Fla. Stat. § 316.0083(1)(b)(4)? b. Was the fee assessed under

Steven J. Pincus, etc. v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc., etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2022 | Docket: 62649855

Published

finding: (1) ATS’s fee was not prohibited under section 316.0083(b)(4) because the fee was not a “commission”

Steven J. Pincus v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 2, 2021 | Docket: 58973234

Published

an illegal commission under Florida Statutes § 316.0083(b)(4); (2) the fee was a prohibited surcharge

Luis Torres Jimenez v. State of Florida, etc.

246 So. 3d 219

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2018 | Docket: 6384572

Published

Fla.; § 316.0083(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). In addition to this grant of authority, section 316.0083(1)(a)"does

City of Oldsmar v. Trinh

210 So. 3d 191, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2016 | Docket: 4483499

Published

certified questions are as follows: 1. DOES SECTION 316.0083(l)(a) AUTHORIZE A MUNICIPALITY TO CONTRACT

Christopher Parker v. City Of Apopka

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 2016 | Docket: 4418272

Published

Program (the “Wandall Act”), Florida Statutes § 316.0083. The Wandall Act authorizes the use of red-light

State Ex Rel. City of Aventura v. Jimenez

211 So. 3d 158, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2016 | Docket: 4114279

Published

authority to use an agent to “review” images, section 316.0083(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014); (2) the Vendor had

Clark v. State

170 So. 3d 69, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8188, 2015 WL 2458128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2015 | Docket: 60249505

Published

separately issued a traffic citation pursuant to section 316.0083, Florida Statutes (2012), known as the Mark

City of Fort Lauderdale v. June Dhar

154 So. 3d 366, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17154, 2014 WL 5343530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2014 | Docket: 1419251

Published

dismissing a traffic citation on grounds that section 316.0083(l)(d)3., Florida Statutes (2012), of the Mark

City of Hollywood, a political subdivision of the State of Florida v. Eric Arem

154 So. 3d 359, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16790, 2014 WL 5149159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2014 | Docket: 1447720

Published

Appellate Procedure 9.160(d): 1. Does Florida Statute 316.0083(l)(a) authorize a municipality to delegate

State v. Arrington

95 So. 3d 324, 2012 WL 3023203, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12095

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2012 | Docket: 60311185

Published

offered the following rationale: Although [section] 316.0083[, Florida Statutes (2010) ] prohibits the

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Aug 26, 2010 | Docket: 3255252

Published

framework for enforcement of the act is provided. Section 316.0083(1)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that within