Florida Statute 318.325 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES

Chapter 318
DISPOSITION OF TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 318.325

318.325 Jurisdiction and procedure for parking infractions.—Any county or municipality may adopt an ordinance that allows the county or municipality to refer cases involving the violation of a county or municipal parking ordinance to a hearing officer. Notwithstanding the provisions of ss. 318.14 and 775.08(3), any parking violation shall be deemed to be an infraction as defined in s. 318.13(3). However, the violation must be enforced and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to parking violations and with the charter or code of the county or municipality where the violation occurred. The clerk of the court or the designated traffic violations bureau must collect and distribute the fines, forfeitures, and court costs assessed under this section.

History.—s. 1, ch. 94-202; s. 101, ch. 2003-402; s. 62, ch. 2004-265; s. 52, ch. 2005-236.

F.S. 318.325 on Google Scholar

F.S. 318.325 on Casetext

Amendments to 318.325

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 318.325

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 318.325.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 318.325

Total Results: 20

Darryl Brian Barwick v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-28

Snippet: discovered evidence); Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (holding that “new opinions” and “research

Darryl Brian Barwick v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-28

Snippet: discovered evidence); Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (holding that “new opinions” and “research

Quentin Marcus Truehill v. State of Florida & Quentin Marcus Truehill v. Ricky D. Dixon, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-09-29

Snippet: discovered evidence. See Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325–26 (Fla. 2007) (“[T]his Court has not recognized

Stephen Todd Booker v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-02-17

Snippet: evidence.”); see also Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (“[T]his Court has not recognized

Stephen Todd Booker v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-02-03

Snippet: evidence.”); see also Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (“[T]his Court has not recognized

Brett A. Bogle v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-05-27

Snippet: Crim. P. 3.851(e)(2); Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007)). The issues which Bogle has raised

Brett A. Bogle v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-12-19

Snippet: -4- State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007).5 Bogle was well aware of potential

Specialty Hospital-Gainesville, Inc. v. Charles Barth

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-15

Snippet: Jackson Cty. Hosp. Corp. v. Aldrich, 835 So. 2d 318, 325-326 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). A trial court should

ANDRE WILSON, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-04

Citation: 242 So. 3d 484

Snippet: 2007) (citing Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318, 325 (1994), and Pitts, 936 So. 2d at 1128), the officers

& SC13-2422 Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida & Gerhard Hojan v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-31

Citation: 212 So. 3d 982

Snippet: prior decisions. See Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (“First, the evidence must not have

Bell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-28

Citation: 201 So. 3d 1267, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16020

Snippet: Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318, 325, 114 S.Ct. 1526, 128 L.Ed.2d 293 (1994) (citations

& SC13-1959 Lucious Boyd v. State of Florida & Lucious Boyd v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-17

Citation: 200 So. 3d 685

Snippet: use of diligence.” Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007). As Boyd acknowledges, many of the

& SC13-2422 Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida and Gerhard Hojan v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-09-03

Snippet: - 16 - Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (“First, the evidence must not have

Eddie Wayne Davis v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-07

Citation: 142 So. 3d 867, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 485, 2014 WL 3034008, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2148

Snippet: evidence.” Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007). The articles that Davis relies upon

Kimbrough v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-10-31

Citation: 125 So. 3d 752, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 778, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2353, 2013 WL 5878900

Snippet: evidence.” (citing Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007); Rutherford v. State, 940 So.2d 1112

Henry v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-10-31

Citation: 125 So. 3d 745, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 773, 2013 WL 5878896, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2351

Snippet: sentence” on retrial. Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007) (citing Jones, 591 So.2d at 915). The

Foster v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-10-17

Citation: 132 So. 3d 40, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 756, 2013 WL 5659482, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2287

Snippet: discovered evidence. See Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007) (holding that “new opinions” or “new

Howell v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-02-25

Citation: 145 So. 3d 774, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 147, 2013 WL 673241, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 297

Snippet: newly discovered. See Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007) (“[T]his Court has not recognized ‘new

Dennis v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-12-20

Citation: 109 So. 3d 680, 2012 WL 6619282

Snippet: 326, 353 (Fla.2007); Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007). Therefore, we affirm the summary denial

Serrano v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-17

Citation: 64 So. 3d 93, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 108, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 619, 2011 WL 904071

Snippet: 326, 353 (Fla.2007); Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007). And this Court has previously rejected