Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 318.325 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 318.325 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 318.325

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 318
DISPOSITION OF TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 318.325
318.325 Jurisdiction and procedure for parking infractions.Any county or municipality may adopt an ordinance that allows the county or municipality to refer cases involving the violation of a county or municipal parking ordinance to a hearing officer. Notwithstanding the provisions of ss. 318.14 and 775.08(3), any parking violation shall be deemed to be an infraction as defined in s. 318.13(3). However, the violation must be enforced and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to parking violations and with the charter or code of the county or municipality where the violation occurred. The clerk of the court or the designated traffic violations bureau must collect and distribute the fines, forfeitures, and court costs assessed under this section.
History.s. 1, ch. 94-202; s. 101, ch. 2003-402; s. 62, ch. 2004-265; s. 52, ch. 2005-236.

F.S. 318.325 on Google Scholar

F.S. 318.325 on Casetext

Amendments to 318.325


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 318.325
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 318.325.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 318.325

Total Results: 20

Darryl Brian Barwick v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2023-04-28T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: discovered evidence); Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (holding that “new opinions” and “

Darryl Brian Barwick v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2023-04-28T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: discovered evidence); Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (holding that “new opinions” and “

Quentin Marcus Truehill v. State of Florida & Quentin Marcus Truehill v. Ricky D. Dixon, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2022-09-29T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: discovered evidence. See Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325–26 (Fla. 2007) (“[T]his Court has not recognized

Stephen Todd Booker v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2022-02-16T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: evidence.”); see also Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (“[T]his Court has not recognized

Stephen Todd Booker v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2022-02-02T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: evidence.”); see also Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (“[T]his Court has not recognized

Brett A. Bogle v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2021-05-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Crim. P. 3.851(e)(2); Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007)). The issues which Bogle has raised

Brett A. Bogle v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2019-12-18T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: -4- State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007).5 Bogle was well aware of potential

Specialty Hospital-Gainesville, Inc. v. Charles Barth

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-15T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Jackson Cty. Hosp. Corp. v. Aldrich, 835 So. 2d 318, 325-326 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). A trial court should

Robert Joe Long v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2019-05-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 271 So. 3d 938

Snippet: Schwab v. State , 969 So.2d 318 , 325-26 (Fla. 2007) (stating that "this Court

ANDRE WILSON, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-04T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 2007) (citing Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318, 325 (1994), and Pitts, 936 So. 2d at 1128), the officers

Eric Scott Branch v. State of Florida & SC18-218 Eric Scott Branch v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-02-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 236 So. 3d 981

Snippet: [ v. State , 969 So.2d 318 , 325 (Fla. 2007) ] (citing Diaz v. State … Schwab v. State , 969 So.2d 318 , 325 (Fla. 2007). The articles that Davis relies

& SC13-2422 Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida & Gerhard Hojan v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-01-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 212 So. 3d 982

Snippet: prior decisions. See Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (“First, the evidence must not have

Bell v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-10-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 201 So. 3d 1267

Snippet: Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318, 325, 114 S.Ct. 1526, 128 L.Ed.2d 293 (1994) (citations

& SC13-1959 Lucious Boyd v. State of Florida & Lucious Boyd v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-12-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 200 So. 3d 685

Snippet: use of diligence.” Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007). As Boyd acknowledges, many of the

& SC13-2422 Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida and Gerhard Hojan v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-09-03T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: - 16 - Schwab v. State, 969 So. 2d 318, 325 (Fla. 2007) (“First, the evidence must not have

Eddie Wayne Davis v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-07-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 142 So. 3d 867

Snippet: evidence.” Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007). The articles that Davis relies upon

Kimbrough v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-10-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 125 So. 3d 752

Snippet: evidence.” (citing Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007); Rutherford v. State, 940 So.2d 1112

Henry v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-10-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 125 So. 3d 745

Snippet: sentence” on retrial. Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007) (citing Jones, 591 So.2d at 915). The

Foster v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-10-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 132 So. 3d 40

Snippet: discovered evidence. See Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007) (holding that “new opinions” or “new

Howell v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-02-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 145 So. 3d 774

Snippet: newly discovered. See Schwab v. State, 969 So.2d 318, 325 (Fla.2007) (“[T]his Court has not recognized ‘