Florida Statute 328.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIV
VESSELS

Chapter 328
VESSELS: TITLE CERTIFICATES; LIENS; REGISTRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 328.11

328.11 Duplicate certificate of title.—

(1) If a written certificate of title is lost, stolen, mutilated, destroyed, or otherwise becomes unavailable or illegible, the secured party of record or, if no secured party is indicated in the files of the department, the owner of record may apply for and, by furnishing information satisfactory to the department, obtain a duplicate certificate in the name of the owner of record.

(2) An applicant for a duplicate certificate of title must sign the application, and, except as otherwise permitted by the department, the application must comply with s. 328.01. The application must include the existing certificate unless the certificate is lost, stolen, mutilated, destroyed, or otherwise unavailable.

(3) A duplicate certificate of title created by the department must comply with s. 328.04 and indicate on the face of the certificate that it is a duplicate certificate.

(4) If a person receiving a duplicate certificate of title subsequently obtains possession of the original written certificate, the person shall promptly destroy the original certificate of title.

(5) The department shall charge a fee of $6 for issuing a duplicate certificate.

(6) In addition to the fee imposed by subsection (5), the department shall charge a fee of $5 for expedited service in issuing a duplicate certificate of title. Application for such expedited service may be made by mail or in person. The department shall issue each certificate of title applied for under this subsection within 5 working days after receipt of a proper application or shall refund the additional $5 fee upon written request by the applicant.

(7) The department shall implement a system to verify that the application is signed by a person authorized to receive a duplicate title certificate under this section if the address shown on the application is different from the address shown for the applicant on the records of the department.

History.—s. 4, ch. 67-586; ss. 25, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 13, ch. 74-327; s. 14, ch. 84-184; s. 2, ch. 87-291; s. 59, ch. 95-333; s. 63, ch. 96-413; s. 59, ch. 99-248; s. 14, ch. 2019-76.

Note.—Former s. 371.79.

F.S. 328.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 328.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 328.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 328.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 328.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 328.11

Total Results: 20

Brody v. Broward County Sheriff's Office

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-05-07

Citation: 137 So. 3d 610, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6725, 2014 WL 1795496

Snippet: the lien. See, e.g., Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328,11 So.2d 892 (1943); Naftzger v. Elam, 41 So.3d 944

Riveiro v. J. Cheney Mason, P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-02-01

Citation: 82 So. 3d 1094, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1248, 2012 WL 279659

Snippet: judgment therefor." Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943). In Miller, the plaintiff/appellant

Rose v. Rose

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-04-20

Citation: 898 So. 2d 1216, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5447, 2005 WL 901189

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943)(“We do not deny the right

Zaldivar v. Okeelanta Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-07-26

Citation: 877 So. 2d 927, 2004 WL 1645945

Snippet: settlement stipulation. See Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943); Samuel L. Heller, P.A. v

Ingalsbe v. Stewart Agency, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-14

Citation: 869 So. 2d 30, 2004 WL 385002

Snippet: attorney's fees. See Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943). A line of Florida cases

Heller v. Held

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-06-05

Citation: 817 So. 2d 1023, 2002 WL 1174548

Snippet: intent to do so or not." Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943). Consequently, if a party

Soule, Leal & Associates, P.A. v. Zipnick

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-11-15

Citation: 770 So. 2d 1282, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14790, 2000 WL 1700877

Snippet: law firm relies on Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943), for the proposition that

Gaebe, Murphy, Mullen & Antonelli v. Bradt

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-10-29

Citation: 704 So. 2d 618, 1997 WL 673813

Snippet: 2d at 549 (quoting Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (Fla.1943)). Based on the foregoing,

Rose v. Marcus

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-07-20

Citation: 622 So. 2d 63, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7615, 1993 WL 267522

Snippet: 428 So.2d at 1385; Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943); Conroy v. Conroy, 392 So.2d 934

Brown v. Vermont Mut. Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-02-12

Citation: 614 So. 2d 574, 1993 WL 35252

Snippet: pursuant to settlement. Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943); Mabry v. Knabb, 151 Fla. 432

Hutchins v. Hutchins

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-30

Citation: 522 So. 2d 547, 1988 WL 25473

Snippet: Avery relies upon Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943). The former husband relies upon

Litman v. FINE, JACOBSON, SCHWARTZ

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-12-22

Citation: 517 So. 2d 88

Snippet: certain circumstances, Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943), and to appeal if, for example

Zimmerman v. Livnat

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-06-03

Citation: 507 So. 2d 1205, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1401

Snippet: client. See, e.g., Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943), and In Re Warner's Estate, 160

Wishoff v. Wishoff

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-12-03

Citation: 497 So. 2d 1351, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2550, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10926

Snippet: 890 (Fla.1945) and Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943). Bruno Di Giulian represented

Lopez v. Dublin Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-05-27

Citation: 489 So. 2d 805, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1198

Snippet: manifest injustice. See Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943); Curr v. Helene Transportation

N. Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Finkelstein

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-08-29

Citation: 456 So. 2d 498

Snippet: (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943). Reversed. DOWNEY, HURLEY and

Dowda and Fields, PA v. Cobb

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-07-19

Citation: 452 So. 2d 1140

Snippet: 35 So.2d 296 (1948); Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943); Scott v. Kirtley, 113 Fla. 637

Brake v. Sanchez-Lopez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-07-10

Citation: 452 So. 2d 1071

Snippet: notice of the claim. Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943). We note that in order for a charging

Sinclair, Etc. & Zavertnik, PA v. Baucom

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-17

Citation: 428 So. 2d 1383

Snippet: from the recovery. Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943); Conroy v. Conroy, 392 So.2d 934

Baucom v. Baucom

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-04-07

Citation: 397 So. 2d 347, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265

Snippet: the rule stated in Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943) inapplicable; see e. g., Sentco