Florida Statute 331.22 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXV
AVIATION

Chapter 331
AVIATION AND AEROSPACE FACILITIES AND COMMERCE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 331.22

331.22 Certain information exempt from disclosure.—Airport security plans of an aviation authority created by act of the Legislature or of an aviation department of a county or municipality which operates an international airport are exempt from provisions of s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution. In addition, photographs, maps, blueprints, drawings, and similar materials that depict critical airport operating facilities are exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution, to the extent that an aviation authority created by act of the Legislature or an aviation department of a county or municipality which operates an airport reasonably determines that such items contain information that is not generally known and that could jeopardize the security of the airport; however, information relating to real estate leases, layout plans, blueprints, or information relevant thereto, is not to be included in this exemption. The exemptions in this section are applicable only to records held by an aviation authority created by act of the Legislature or to records of a county or municipal aviation department that operates an airport.

History.—s. 1, ch. 96-401; s. 1, ch. 2001-59.

F.S. 331.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 331.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 331.22

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 331.22

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 331.22.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 331.22

Total Results: 5

Ridge v. Farina

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-12-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 461 So. 2d 1018, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 53, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16227

Snippet: circumstance. Similarly, in Boyer v. Boyer, 73 Ill.2d 331, 22 Ill.Dec. 747, 383 N.E.2d 223 (1978), the Illinois

Hodge v. Maith

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-07-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 435 So. 2d 387

Snippet: 409 A.2d 276 (1979); Boyer v. Boyer, 73 Ill.2d 331, 22 Ill.Dec. 747, 383 N.E.2d 223 (1978). Indeed, to

Manning v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1957-03-12T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 93 So. 2d 716

Snippet: his codefendant. Harper v. State, 1945, 156 Fla. 331, 22 So.2d 766. In the case of Taylor v. State, 1947

Gandy v. Borras

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1934-04-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 154 So. 248, 114 Fla. 503, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1870

Snippet: 499; Rippe v. Becker, 56 Minn. 100, 57 N.W. Rep. 331, 22 L. R. A. 857; State v, Phelps, 144 Wis. 1, 128

Moon v. Wilson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1930-09-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 130 So. 25, 100 Fla. 791

Snippet: ; Cutcliff v. McAnally, 88 Ala. 507, 7 So. R. 331; 22 L.R.A. (N.S.) 364. With reference to extras under