Florida Statute 333.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXV
AVIATION

Chapter 333
AIRPORT ZONING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 333.11

333.11 Judicial review.—

(1) Any person, political subdivision, or joint airport zoning board affected by a decision of a political subdivision or its administrative agency may apply for judicial relief to the circuit court in the judicial circuit where the political subdivision is located within 30 days after rendition of the decision. Review shall be by petition for writ of certiorari, which shall be governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

(2) The court has exclusive jurisdiction to affirm, reverse, or modify the decision on the permit or other determination from which the appeal is taken and, if appropriate, to order further proceedings by the political subdivision or its administrative agency. The findings of fact by the political subdivision or its administrative agency, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be accepted by the court as conclusive, and an objection to a decision of the political subdivision or its administrative agency may not be considered by the court unless such objection was raised in the underlying proceeding.

(3) If airport zoning regulations adopted under this chapter are held by a court to interfere with the use and enjoyment of a particular structure or parcel of land to such an extent, or to be so onerous in their application to such a structure or parcel of land, as to constitute a taking or deprivation of that property in violation of the State Constitution or the Constitution of the United States, such holding shall not affect the application of such regulations to other structures and parcels of land, or such regulations as are not involved in the particular decision.

(4) A judicial appeal to any court may not be permitted under this section until the appellant has exhausted all of its remedies through application for local government permits, exceptions, and appeals.

History.—s. 11, ch. 23079, 1945; s. 43, ch. 63-512; s. 7, ch. 88-356; s. 485, ch. 95-148; s. 9, ch. 2016-209; s. 32, ch. 2016-239.

F.S. 333.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 333.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 333.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 333.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 333.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 333.11

Total Results: 13

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-10-17

Citation: 587 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10289

Snippet: C.F.R. §§ 77.21, 77.23, 77.25, 77.28-.29. . § 333.11, Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.630. . The

In Re Estate of Gainer

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-14

Citation: 466 So. 2d 1055, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 116

Snippet: 20 So.2d 400 (1945); Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777 (1943). In the context of this uncertainty

Drozinski v. Straub

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-09

Citation: 383 So. 2d 301

Snippet: So.2d 726 (Fla. 1956); Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777 (Fla. 1943); Moskowitz v. Marrow, 251

Valdes v. Muniz

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-01-22

Citation: 164 So. 2d 876

Snippet: Seymour case: “Nothing in Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777, pertaining to a joint account, is inconsistent

Kuebler v. Kuebler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-01-06

Citation: 131 So. 2d 211

Snippet: 58 So.2d 686; Cerny v. Cerny, 1943, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777; Crabtree v. Garcia, Fla. 1949, 43 So

Florida National Bank of Jacksonville v. Gann

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-03-26

Citation: 101 So. 2d 579

Snippet: rule. In the case of Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777, Frank Cerny in April, 1934, which was

Seymour v. Seymour

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-03-02

Citation: 85 So. 2d 726

Snippet: Felton Seymour. Nothing in Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777, pertaining to a joint account, is inconsistent

Crawford v. McGraw

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-11-21

Citation: 61 So. 2d 484, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1806

Snippet: Court, in the cases of Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777; Crabtree v. Garcia, Fla., 43 So.2d 466

Crabtree v. Garcia

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1949-12-23

Citation: 43 So. 2d 466, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1073

Snippet: considered by this Court in Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777; Kozacik v. Kozacik, 157 Fla. 597, 26

Webster v. St. Petersburg Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-01-12

Citation: 20 So. 2d 400, 155 Fla. 412, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 534

Snippet: the facts involved in Cerny v. Cerny, 152 Fla. 333, 11 So.2d 777, and there it was held that the claimant

Fisher v. Guidy

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-07-07

Citation: 142 So. 818, 106 Fla. 94

Snippet: express subsisting trust. Oliver vs. Piatt, 3 How. 333, 11 L. ed. 622, 657; Speidel vs. Henrici,120 U.S. 377

Myers v. Van Buskirk

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-12-05

Citation: 119 So. 123, 96 Fla. 704

Snippet: 212; 17 So. R. 66; Oliver v. Piatt, 3 How (U.S.) 333; 11 L.Ed. 622; Warvelle, Vendors, Sec. 613; 27 R. C

McDaniel v. Harrell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-02-01

Citation: 81 Fla. 66, 87 So. 631

Snippet: jurisdiction are exempt from: such liability. 19 Cyc. 333; 11 R. C. L., Sec. 28, p. 815; Calhoun v. Little, supra