Florida Statute 335.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 335
STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 335.14

335.14 Traffic control devices on State Highway System or State Park Road System; exemption for computerized traffic systems and control devices.—

(1) All traffic control devices installed on any road on the State Highway System or State Park Road System shall conform to the uniform system of traffic control devices adopted pursuant to s. 316.0745. No such device shall be installed on the State Highway System without the approval of the department and, if the road is a federal-aid road, the additional concurrence of the Federal Highway Administration. Any such device that is installed without such approval may be removed without payment to the owner if, upon request by the department, the owner refuses to remove such device.

(2) Computerized traffic systems and control devices which are used solely for the purpose of motor vehicle traffic control and surveillance shall be exempted from the provisions of chapter 282.

History.—s. 38, ch. 29965, 1955; s. 13, ch. 57-318; ss. 23, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 82-94; s. 50, ch. 84-309; s. 15, ch. 85-180; s. 2, ch. 87-352; s. 30, ch. 2003-1.

F.S. 335.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 335.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 335.14

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 335.14

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 335.14.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 335.14

Total Results: 5

Ludovici v. McKiness

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-05-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 545 So. 2d 335, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1196, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682, 1989 WL 49923

Snippet: Baskin, Cope, Hubbart 16 May 1989 545 So. 2d 335, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1196, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682,

Shaffer v. School Board of Martin County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-05-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 543 So. 2d 335, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1146, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2566, 1989 WL 47152

Snippet: , Downey, Karen, Martin 10 May 1989 543 So. 2d 335, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1146, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2566,

Brown v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 426 So. 2d 76

Snippet: ever been hypnotized. See Diamond, supra, at 334-335. [14] Our research indicates that almost all courts

McNulty v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1967-06-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 199 So. 2d 706, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3923

Snippet: regulating, warning, or guiding traffic.” F.S. Section 335.14, F.S.A., reads in part: “Traffic devices on state…Department had statutory authority under F.S. Section 335.14, F.S.A., and also under its general statutory powers

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Kaplan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-01-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 108 So. 2d 503

Snippet: Belvedere Hotel Co. v. Williams, 137 Md. 665, 113 A. 335, 14 A.L.R. 622, as authority for the proposition that