Florida Statute 342.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 342
WATERWAY AND WATERFRONT IMPROVEMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 342.05

342.05 Precautions as to use of poisons.—Any county or incorporated city or town in the state, its agents, servants, employees, and contractors, may use any poisonous substance, chemical, or spray in killing water hyacinths and other disagreeable or obnoxious vegetation in the waterways mentioned in s. 342.03, provided no such poisonous substance, chemical, or spray shall be used which might injure or destroy fish life or human or other animal life without first taking sufficient precaution to prevent the same.

History.—s. 3, ch. 14651, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2011(6).

F.S. 342.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 342.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 342.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 342.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 342.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 342.05

Total Results: 20

Thomas Coniglio v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-11-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: determined the lowest permissible score to be 1,342.5 months Department of Corrections on each count and

GRISOLIA v. Pfeffer

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-11-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 77 So. 3d 732, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18673, 2011 WL 5864806

Snippet: 211.1, 212.1 and 245 (1979). Cooke, 412 So.2d at 342. [5] The Widow has since renewed her temporary visa

Green v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-10-15T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 998 So. 2d 1149

Snippet: offense for which he is incarcerated. See ch. 94-342, § 5; ch. 95-184, § 28, Laws of Fla. The statute cited

SALTPONDS CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC. v. McCoy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-12-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 972 So. 2d 230

Snippet: actions commenced on or after July 1, 2004. Ch.2004-342, § 5, Laws of Fla. The present action was filed on

Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-09-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 864 So. 2d 11

Snippet: 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Dessert, 392 So.2d at 342. [5] Specifically, the amendment provided: The same

Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2003-06-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 848 So. 2d 1069, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1063, 2003 WL 21402500

Snippet: amending Florida Probate Rules 5.122, 5.205, 5.240, 5.342, 5.385, 5.407, 5.430, 5.496, 5.552, 5.555, and 5.680…Probate Code changes (rules 5.122, 5.205, 5.240, 5.342, 5.385, 5.430, and 5.496), the amendments shall become

City Com'n of City of Miami v. Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-08-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 553 So. 2d 1227

Snippet: result of the funeral home," (App. A-2 at R.342). [5] Two commissioners recused themselves from this

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1989-05-02T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Patient's Compensation Fund v. S.L.R., 458 So.2d 342 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1984). 5 See, Ch. 41-21228, Laws of

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-08-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Patient's Compensation Fund v. S.L.R., 458 So.2d 342 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1984); Whitney v. Marion County Hospital

Sellers v. Culbertson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1969-07-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 224 So. 2d 808, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5608

Snippet: of Renshaw v. State ex rel. Hickland, 149 Fla. 342, 5 So.2d 700 (1942). Affirmed. No. 69-106

City of Miami v. Kellum

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-12-03T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 147 So. 2d 147

Snippet: its application. See Renshaw v. State, 149 Fla. 342, 5 So.2d 700; Ladas v. Titus, Fla. 1951, 53 So.2d

State ex rel. Mann v. Burns

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-02-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 109 So. 2d 195

Snippet: City Manager v. State ex rel. Hickland, 149 Fla. 342, 5 So.2d 700; Cone v. Benjamin, 157 Fla. 800, 27 So

State ex rel. Balma v. Evans

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-12-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 107 So. 2d 620

Snippet: relief. Renshaw v. State ex rel. Hickland, 149 Fla. 342, 5 So.2d 700; Ladas v. Titus, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 323

State Ex Rel. Gibbs v. Lunsford

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1939-12-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 192 So. 485, 141 Fla. 12

Snippet: . Gleason, 12 Fla. 190; State v. Saxon, 25 Fla. 342, 5 So. 801; Town of Enterprise v. State, 29 Fla. 128

Berger v. Mabry

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-11-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 151 So. 302, 113 Fla. 31, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1661

Snippet: #x27; " See also: Sayles v. Bates, 15 R.I. 342, 5 Atl. Rep. 497; Dain Mfg. Co. v. Trumbull Seed Co

State of Florida Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Stuart

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1929-01-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 120 So. 335, 97 Fla. 69

Snippet: ., 563; 32 Cyc., 1458; State v. Saxon, 25 Fla., 342, 5 So. R. 801; Attorney General v. Connors, 27 Fla…674, 675, also State ex rel Law v. Saxon, 25 Fla. 342, 5 So. R. 801. This Court might well be justified

State ex rel. Ellis v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1907-01-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 53 Fla. 711

Snippet: Stats, of 1906; State ex rel. v. Saxon, 25 Fla. 342, 5 South. Rep. 801; Wefel v. Stillman (Ala.), 44 South

Buckman v. State ex rel. Spencer

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1894-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 34 Fla. 48

Snippet: 12 Fla., 190; State ex rel. vs. Saxon, 25 Fla., 342, 5 South. Rep., 801; State ex rel. vs. Anderson, supra

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Philips

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1892-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 30 Fla. 579

Snippet: perfect right. State ex rel. Law vs. Saxon, 25 Fla., 342, 5 South. Rep., 801; Town of Enterprise vs. State

Town of Enterprise v. State ex rel. Attorney-General

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1892-01-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 29 Fla. 128

Snippet: Wis., 63; State ex rel. Law vs. Saxon, 25 Fla., 342, 5 South. Rep., 801. It is contended here that while