Florida Statute 348.61 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 348
EXPRESSWAY AND BRIDGE AUTHORITIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 348.61

348.61 Department may be appointed agent of authority for construction.—The department may be appointed by the authority as its agent for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, improving, extending or repairing the expressway system. In such event, the authority shall provide the department with complete copies of all documents, agreements, resolutions, contracts and instruments relating thereto and shall request the department to do such construction work including the planning, surveying and actual construction involved and shall transfer to the credit of an account of the department in the Treasury of the state the necessary funds therefor. The department shall thereupon be authorized, empowered and directed to proceed with such construction work and to use the said funds for such purpose and in the same manner that it is now authorized to use the funds otherwise authorized by law for its use in construction of roads and bridges.

History.—s. 12, ch. 63-447; ss. 23, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 348.61 on Google Scholar

F.S. 348.61 on Casetext

Amendments to 348.61

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 348.61

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 348.61.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 348.61

Total Results: 2

Jones v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-09-07

Citation: 68 So. 3d 422, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14104, 2011 WL 3903179

Snippet: January, 2010, and the jury awarded Jones $278,348.61. The *423 verdict included awards of $56,723.61

Obel v. Henshaw

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-06-12

Citation: 130 So. 2d 892, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2783

Snippet: pay unto the Plaintiff, Leo Obel, the sum of $5,348.61, representing the Plaintiff Obel’s proper share