Florida Statute 348.64 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 348
EXPRESSWAY AND BRIDGE AUTHORITIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 348.64

348.64 Covenant of the state.—The state does hereby pledge to and agree with the holders from time to time of the bonds that the state will not limit or alter the rights hereby vested in the authority, the department, the county and the city to collect revenues and Hillsborough County gasoline tax funds and to fulfill the terms of any agreements made with the holders of bonds or to in any way impair the rights and remedies of such holders until such bonds and the interest due thereon have been paid. The state does further pledge to and agree with the United States and any federal agency that in the event any federal agency shall construct or contribute funds for the construction, reconstruction, extension or improvement of the system or any part thereof the state will not alter or limit the rights of the authority, the department, the county or the city in any manner which would be inconsistent with the continued maintenance or operation of the system or the construction, reconstruction, extension or improvement thereof and which would be inconsistent with the due performance of any agreements between the authority and any such federal agency. The authority, the department, the county and the city shall continue to have and may exercise all powers herein granted so long as the same shall be necessary or desirable for the carrying out of the purposes of this part.

History.—s. 15, ch. 63-447; ss. 23, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 348.64 on Google Scholar

F.S. 348.64 on Casetext

Amendments to 348.64

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 348.64

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 348.64.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 348.64

Total Results: 4

Stoudt v. Securities Investment Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-04-19

Citation: 140 So. 2d 122, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3176

Snippet: $2386.31 to .the defendant finance company and $348.64 to himself.' We have carefully reviewed the testimony

State Plant Board v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-03-25

Citation: 110 So. 2d 401

Snippet: City of Stuart, 1929, 97 Fla. 69, 120 So. 335, 348, 64 A.L.R. 1307. Thus, this provision has been applied

Blackburn v. Venice Inlet Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1948-12-03

Citation: 38 So. 2d 43, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 1027

Snippet: judgments was in favor of Joe Gill in the sum of $27,348.64 and the other was in favor of the Bank of Sarasota

Scott v. Harrison

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-10-31

Citation: 184 So. 233, 134 Fla. 696, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1171

Snippet: Thousand, Three Hundred Forty-eight and 64-100 ($27,348.64) Dollars, which judgment is valid and outstanding