Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 366.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 366.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 366.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVII
RAILROADS AND OTHER REGULATED UTILITIES
Chapter 366
PUBLIC UTILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 366.09
366.09 Incrimination at hearing of commission.—Any person called upon to testify before the commission or one of its examiners shall not be excused from answering on the ground or claim that his or her testimony would tend to incriminate himself or herself; but no person having so testified shall be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he or she may have testified or produced documentary evidence provided that no person so testifying shall be exempted from prosecution or punishment for perjury in so testifying.
History.—s. 9, ch. 26545, 1951; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 16, ch. 80-35; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 20, 22, ch. 89-292; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 553, ch. 95-148.

F.S. 366.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 366.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 366.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 366.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 366.09.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 366.09

Total Results: 5

Minick v. Minick

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-07-18

Citation: 149 So. 483, 111 Fla. 469, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2011

Snippet: conclusive, it is worthy of consideration. 19 C. J. 366; 9 R. C. L. 477. In this connection see also Frazier

Scott v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1912-06-15

Citation: 64 Fla. 490

Snippet: 7 South. Rep. 593; Armstrong v. State, 27 Fla. 366, 9 South. Rep. 1, 26 Amer. St. Rep. 72; Armstrong

Williams v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 128

Snippet: 11 South. Rep. 618; Armstrong v. State, 27 Fla. 366, 9 South. Rep. 1; Hodge v. State, 26 Fla. 11, 7 South

Brown v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1898-06-15

Citation: 40 Fla. 459

Snippet: 7 South. Rep. 593; Armstrong v. State, 27 Fla. 366, 9 South. Rep. 1, and authorities cited; Armstrong

Armstrong v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1892-06-15

Citation: 30 Fla. 170

Snippet: was reversed and a new trial awarded. 27 Fla., 366, 9 South. Rep., 1. This reversal was upon the ground