Florida Statute 382.007 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH

Chapter 382
VITAL STATISTICS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 382.007

382.007 Final dispositions prohibited without burial-transit permit; records of dead bodies disposed.—A person in charge of any premises on which final dispositions are made shall not inter or permit the interment or other disposition of any dead body unless it is accompanied by a burial-transit permit. Such person shall enter upon the permit the date of final disposition. He or she shall keep a record of all dead bodies buried or otherwise disposed of on the premises under his or her charge, in each case stating the name of each deceased person, place of death, date of final disposition, and name and address of the funeral director which record shall at all times be open to official inspection. The burial-transit permit on file may satisfy this requirement. The funeral director, when burying a dead body in a cemetery having no person in charge, shall enter the date of final disposition on the permit, write “No person in charge” on the permit, and keep the permit on file for at least 3 years after the date of final disposition.

History.—s. 11, ch. 6892, 1915; RGS 2081; CGL 3281; s. 6, ch. 25372, 1949; s. 6, ch. 87-387; s. 664, ch. 95-148; s. 92, ch. 97-237; s. 4, ch. 2015-105.

Note.—Former s. 382.14.

F.S. 382.007 on Google Scholar

F.S. 382.007 on Casetext

Amendments to 382.007

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 382.007

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 382.007.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 382.007

Total Results: 15

Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Industries, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2009-11-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 22 So. 3d 36, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1868, 2009 WL 3644163

Snippet: malpractice claims in section 95.11(4)(a), see ch. 74-382, § 7, at 1211, Laws of Fla., and the language of this

Houck Corp. v. New River, Ltd., Pasco

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-02-08T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 900 So. 2d 601

Snippet: action to foreclose a mortgage." Ch. 74-382, §§ 7, 18, at 1209-10, 1215, Laws of Fla. These amendments

Nayee v. Nayee

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-01-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 705 So. 2d 961

Snippet: sweeping revisions to section 95.11. See Ch. 74-382, § 7, Laws of Florida. No specific provisions regarding

Barron v. Shapiro

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1990-06-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 565 So. 2d 1319

Snippet: discovered, the injury"). [3] See ch. 74-382, § 7, Laws of Fla. (limitations period begins to run

Edwards v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-01-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 538 So. 2d 440

Snippet: the confrontation. 409 U.S. at 199, 93 S.Ct. at 382. [7] The state argued below, and continues to press

Symons Corp. v. Tartan-Lavers Delray Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-09-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 456 So. 2d 1254

Snippet: fact. Id.; see also, Reinhart v. Phelps, 150 Fla. 382, 7 So.2d 783 (1942). Implied actual notice, being

Kiesel v. Graham

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1980-09-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 388 So. 2d 594

Snippet: . This was changed to five years by Chapter 74-382, § 7, Laws of Florida. In addition, Chapter 74-382…date, the action shall be barred. [2] Chapter 74-382, § 7, Laws of Florida. [3] Every judgment rendered

Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. Sirmons

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1979-02-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 369 So. 2d 572

Snippet: 721, 744, 106 So. 576, 584 (1925). [5] Ch. 74-382, § 7, Laws of Fla., codified as § 95.11(3)(c), Fla.

Carpenter v. Florida Cent. Credit Union

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1979-02-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 369 So. 2d 935

Snippet: when the applicable period became 5 years. Ch. 74-382, § 7, Laws of *937 Florida. Thus, Plaintiff's suit…insufficient to refer to the amendment in Ch. 74-382, § 7, Laws of Florida, which Plaintiff argues was vague… founded on a written instrument." Ch. 74-382, § 7, Laws of Fla. There is no doubt the final blow

Michaels v. Dillon

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-10-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 191 So. 2d 80, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4991

Snippet: 675, 130 So. 596; Rinehart v. Phelps, 150 Fla. 382, 7 So.2d 783; Moskovits v. Moskovits, Fla.App., 112

United Contractors, Inc. v. United Construction Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-06-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 187 So. 2d 695

Snippet: duty to use, Rinehart v. Phelps, 1942, 150 Fla. 382, 7 So.2d 783, but such possession to be notice of

Sire Plan, Inc. v. Brown

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-11-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 134 So. 2d 290

Snippet: . 675,130 So. 596; Rinehart v. Phelps, 150 Fla. 382, 7 So.2d 783; Moskovits v. Moskovits, Fla.App., 112

In Re Brown's Estate

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-11-07T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 134 So. 2d 290

Snippet: 675, 130 So. 596; Rinehart v. Phelps, 150 Fla. 382, 7 So.2d 783; Moskovits v. Moskovits, Fla.App., 112

Chatlos v. McPherson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1957-05-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 95 So. 2d 506

Snippet: 648, 144 So. 481; Rinehart v. Phelps, 150 Fla. 382, 7 So.2d 783; Farish v. Smoot, Fla. 1952, 58 So.2d

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Miami v. Fisher

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1952-06-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 60 So. 2d 496

Snippet: by this Court. See Rinehart v. Phelps, 150 Fla. 382, 7 So.2d 783. The record reflects that Porter G. Fisher