Syfert Injury Law Firm

Pipistrel Italia S.R.L., Etc. v. Susan L. Ciccolini, Etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: for jurisdiction is reviewed de novo.” Id. at 408-09. On appeal, Pipistrel Italia argues the

SCOTT RUDOLPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-12

Snippet: unanswered.” Id.; see State v. Morsman, 394 So. 2d 408, 408−09 (Fla. 1981) (concluding that entering backyard

TERRANCE MCCRAY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-06

Snippet: ”); see also McCray v. State, 283 So. 3d 406, 408–09 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (hearing appellant’s ineffective

SARASOTA COUNTY v. VENICE HMA, LLC, D/B/A VENICE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-29

Snippet: sovereign immunity defense in certiorari. Id. at 408-09; see also Beach Cmty. Bank v. City of Freeport

SHAUN ANTHONY TEDFORD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-11-12

Snippet: 121 S. Ct. 447, 148 L. Ed. 2d 333 (2000). Id. at 408-09. After concluding that “use of a well-trained narcotics-

LEWIS DARREN FRANKLIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-26

Citation: 275 So. 3d 192

Snippet: “compulsion” or “coercion”). See Hall, 187 So. at 408-09; Koontz, 204 So. 2d at 226-27. These cases provide

Alvin Davis v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-25

Citation: 268 So. 3d 958

Snippet: precluded consideration of later arrests. Id. at 408-09. But the PSI provision referenced in Norvil authorizes

Darrell Von Young v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-04

Citation: 266 So. 3d 1225

Snippet: weapon. See, e.g., State v. Horton, 442 So. 2d 408, 408–09 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (holding that the threat to

Corcoran v. Geffin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-28

Citation: 250 So. 3d 779

Snippet: See Fla. Pub. Emps. Council 79 , 784 So.2d at 408-09 (holding that a trial court had no authority to

Tavares W. Spencer, Jr. v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-01-25

Citation: 238 So. 3d 708

Snippet: persuasion. Spencer , 196 So.3d at 408-09 (citation omitted). Finally, I note that

William Joyce v. Federated National Insurance Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-19

Citation: 228 So. 3d 1122, 2017 WL 4684352

Snippet: 655 So.2d at 834; see also [Bell, 734 So.2d at 408-09]. The reason for an award of attorney fees authorized

Marshall v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-31

Citation: 214 So. 3d 776, 2017 WL 1202374, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4381

Snippet: Statutes (2014). See Horsley v. State, 160 So,3d 393, 408-09 (Fla. 2015) (holding that a juvenile whose sentence

Fernandez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-01

Citation: 212 So. 3d 494, 2017 WL 788407, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2716

Snippet: necessarily present a constitutional problem. See id. at 408-09. Reading Norvil as a whole, we conclude that it

Gozzo Development, Inc. v. Professional Roofing Contractors, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-08

Citation: 211 So. 3d 145, 2017 WL 514367, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1543

Snippet: Bank of America, N.A. v. Ribaudo, 199 So.3d 407, 408-09 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (when complaining party failed

Charbonier Food Services, LLC v. 121 Alhambra Tower, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-05

Citation: 206 So. 3d 755, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14842

Snippet: Fire Ins. Co. v. Lehrman, 443 So.2d 408, 408-09 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)). “A contract is ambiguous

Baker v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-09-21

Citation: 210 So. 3d 140, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14119

Snippet: counsel represents the defendant. Id. at 408-09. Thus, we concluded that Mr. Murray’s pro se rule

John O'Connor v. Indian River County Fire Rescue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-08-02

Citation: 197 So. 3d 156, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11619, 2016 WL 4179482

Snippet: Guckenberger v. Seminole Cty., 979 So.2d 407, 408-09 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“ ‘Costs are statutory allowances

Williams v. City of Winter Haven

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-15

Citation: 210 So. 3d 75, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10922

Snippet: Assistance Appeals Comm’n, 114 So.3d 407, 408-09 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). The unemployment compensation

Ivana Vidovic Mlinar v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-03-03

Citation: 186 So. 3d 997, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 76, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 446, 2016 WL 825261

Snippet: Carmack Amendment. = Mlinar, 129 So.3d at 408-09. On appeal, the Fourth District also held

Glasswall, LLC v. Monadnock Construction, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-01-27

Citation: 187 So. 3d 248, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1010

Snippet: Corp., S.A. v. Domar, Ltd,, 766 So.2d 407, 408-09 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). In Rintin, this