Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 409.2574 (2025)

Income deduction enforcement in Title IV-D cases.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

409.2574 Income deduction enforcement in Title IV-D cases.—

(1) The department or its designee shall enforce income deduction orders on behalf of obligees who have applied for IV-D services, and the department shall be considered a party in the action.

(2)(a) In a support order being enforced under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act and which order does not specify income deduction, income deduction shall be enforced by the department or its designee without the need for any amendment to the support order or any further action by the court.

(b) The department shall serve a notice on the obligor that the income deduction notice has been served on the employers. Service upon an obligor under this section shall be made in the manner prescribed in chapter 48. The department shall furnish to the obligor a statement of the obligor’s rights, remedies, and duties in regard to the income deduction.

(c) The obligor has 15 days from the serving of the notice to request a hearing with the department to contest enforcement of income deduction.

(d) The department shall adopt rules to ensure that applicable provisions of s. 61.1301 are followed.

History.—s. 8, ch. 76-220; s. 5, ch. 82-140; s. 148, ch. 86-220; s. 45, ch. 97-103; s. 54, ch. 97-170.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: Se. Bank of Sarasota v. Stone, 500 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Se. Bank of Sarasota v. Stone, 500 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). “181(3) or section 409.2574(4), as appropriate. (Emphasis supplied).”

— 409.2574(4) — 1 case

Se. Bank of Sarasota v. Stone, 500 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). “181(3) or section 409.2574(4), as appropriate. (Emphasis supplied).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.