Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 413.28 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 413.28 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 413.28

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE
Chapter 413
EMPLOYMENT AND RELATED SERVICES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 413.28
413.28 Appropriations of federal funds.In the event federal funds are available to the state for vocational rehabilitation purposes, the division is authorized to comply with such requirements as may be necessary to obtain said federal funds in the most advantageous proportions possible insofar as this may be done without violating other provisions of the state law and Constitution.
History.s. 7, ch. 25364, 1949; s. 25, ch. 29764, 1955; s. 13, ch. 65-239; ss. 2, 3, ch. 67-371; ss. 19, 31, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 160, ch. 71-377; s. 1, ch. 73-305; s. 309, ch. 77-147; s. 6, ch. 87-227; s. 14, ch. 94-324.
Note.Former ss. 229.31, 229.0108.

F.S. 413.28 on Google Scholar

F.S. 413.28 on Casetext

Amendments to 413.28


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 413.28
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 413.28.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 413.28

Total Results: 10

Aberdeen Golf & Country v. Bliss Const.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-09-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 932 So. 2d 235, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14231, 2005 WL 2138798

Snippet: principles. See McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So.2d 692, 693 (1947)(in cases where "both

Lopes v. Lopes

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-08-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 852 So. 2d 402

Snippet: improper. See McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So.2d 692 (1947); Keller v. Keller, 521 So.2d 273

Lambertini v. Lambertini

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-04-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 655 So. 2d 142

Snippet: improper. See McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So.2d 692 (1947); Keller v. Keller, 521 So.2d 273

Jaffe v. Snow

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-11-12T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 610 So. 2d 482

Snippet: should profit. McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So.2d 692 (1947). *488 Ruth Jaffe argues she should

INS. CO. OF ST., PA v. Estate of Guzman

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-10-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 421 So. 2d 597

Snippet: of proof. [7] McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So.2d 692 (1947). [8] Sacks v. Sacks, 267 So.2d

Marshall v. Marshall

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1980-06-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 386 So. 2d 11

Snippet: it finds them. McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So.2d 692 (1947). Here, if the court leaves the

Martinez v. Giordano

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1979-04-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 369 So. 2d 990

Snippet: principle of law in McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So.2d 692 (1947); Sahler v. Sahler, 154 Fla. 206

Moses v. Englander

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-02-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 118 So. 2d 234

Snippet: .2d 105, 107; McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So.2d 692, 693; 12 Fla.Jur., Equity, §§ 54-55,

State ex rel. Florida National Bank v. State Board of Administration

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1934-07-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 115 Fla. 753, 154 So. 876

Snippet: ............ 5,300.00 $40,890.00 $58,103.28 $17,413.28 Surplus 9/30/33 ...............................…....................................... $17,413.28 No Millage required. Current Interest Requirements …Requirements .................................... 17,413.28 $83,280.00 $47,614.66 $35,665.34 2 Mills on $17,765,775.00

Booth v. Lenox

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1903-01-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 45 Fla. 191

Snippet: Rep. 775; Cunningham v. Cunningham, 121 N. C. 413, 28 S. E. Rep. 525; Midmer v. Midmer’s Exrs. 26 N.