Florida Statute 422.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE

Chapter 422
HOUSING COOPERATION LAW

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 422.05

422.05 Contracts for payments for services.—In connection with any housing project located wholly or partly within the area in which it is authorized to act, any state public body may contract with a housing authority or the Federal Government with respect to the sum or sums, if any, which the housing authority or the Federal Government may agree to pay, during any year or period of years, to the state public body for the improvements, services and facilities to be furnished by it for the benefit of said housing project, but in no event shall the amount of such payments exceed the estimated cost to the state public body of the improvements, services or facilities to be so furnished; provided, however, that the absence of a contract for such payments shall in no way relieve any state public body from the duty to furnish, for the benefit of said housing project, customary improvements and such services and facilities as such state public body usually furnishes without a service fee.

History.—s. 5, ch. 17982, 1937; CGL 1940 Supp. 7100(3-ss).

F.S. 422.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 422.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 422.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 422.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 422.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 422.05

Total Results: 6

Mozo v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-01-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 632 So. 2d 623

Snippet: consent of just one of the parties. 394 So.2d at 422. [5] Since our decision rests on state constitutional

State v. Peters

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-11-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 534 So. 2d 760

Snippet: in question, City of North Miami Ordinance No. 422.5, regulates the ownership of pit bulls by requiring…declaring the City of North Miami Ordinance No. 422.5 unconstitutional. The case is remanded for further

Ziegler v. Knuck

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-09-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 419 So. 2d 818

Snippet: International Bhd. of Teamsters, 314 F.2d 418, 422 (5 Cir.1962). We agree. If either Employees Labor

State v. Esperti

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1969-03-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 220 So. 2d 416

Snippet: . Mullins (1954), 162 Ohio St. 419, 123 N.E.2d 422. [5] See footnote 9 in Schmerber v. California, supra

Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. v. Thomas

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1910-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 60 Fla. 412

Snippet: 479; Mobile & M. Ry. Co. v. Gilmer, 85 Ala, 422, 5 South. Rep., 138; 2 Sutherlands on Damages, section

Jones, Varnum & Co. v. Townsend's Administratrix

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1885-01-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 21 Fla. 431

Snippet: 183 ; Fryer vs. Kennersly, 15 C. B., (K. S.,) 422 ; 5 E. & B., 528. Malice is implied from newspaper