Florida Statute 430.101 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE

Chapter 430
ELDER AFFAIRS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 430.101

430.101 Administration of federal aging programs.—The Department of Elderly Affairs is designated the state unit on aging under the federal Older Americans Act of 1965, as amended, and shall exercise all responsibilities under that act. The department is the state agency designated to handle all programs of the Federal Government relating to the aging, by virtue of funds appropriated through the Older Americans Act of 1965 and subsequent amendments, requiring actions within the state which are not the specific responsibility of another state agency under the provisions of federal or state law. Authority is hereby conferred on the department to accept and use any funds in accordance with established state budgetary procedures which might become available pursuant to the purposes set out herein.

History.—s. 1, ch. 70-255; s. 115, ch. 71-355; s. 286, ch. 77-147; s. 18, ch. 78-433; s. 70, ch. 95-418.

Note.—Former s. 409.360; s. 410.011.

F.S. 430.101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 430.101 on Casetext

Amendments to 430.101

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 430.101

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 430.101.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 430.101

Total Results: 16

D'ARCANGELO v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-03-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 82 So. 3d 1174, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4331, 2012 WL 879283

Snippet: consistent. Compare Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981) (holding that… decisions beginning with Bullington, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270, decided the year before

D'Arcangelo v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-04-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 137 So. 3d 1024, 2011 WL 1376875

Snippet: consistent. Compare Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981) (holding that

Hall v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-08-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 853 So. 2d 546

Snippet: jeopardy. See Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981).[1] In Donaldson…s decision in Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). But the United

Kaplan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-09-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 681 So. 2d 1166, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9771, 1996 WL 531055

Snippet: 164 (1984) and Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), the United

King v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-12-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 648 So. 2d 183, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 13196

Snippet: 1984). Compare Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981) with United

King v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-12-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 648 So. 2d 183

Snippet: 1984). Compare Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981) with United

Preston v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-10-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 607 So. 2d 404

Snippet: proceedings. See Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). In Bullington

Williams v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-02-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 595 So. 2d 936, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 92, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 185, 1992 WL 18560

Snippet: .2d 164 (1984); Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981); and United

Wright v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1991-08-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 586 So. 2d 1024

Snippet: .2d 164 (1984); Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). Florida law

State v. Bassett

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-01-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 557 So. 2d 76, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 198, 1990 WL 2414

Snippet: 164 (1984) and Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). Perhaps the

Brown v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1988-02-03T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 521 So. 2d 110

Snippet: 164 (1984), and Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), it failed to

Brown v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1985-06-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 473 So. 2d 1260

Snippet: argument that Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), requires a

Lusk v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1984-01-25T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 446 So. 2d 1038

Snippet: his argument on Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). But the Missouri

Delap v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1983-09-15T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 440 So. 2d 1242

Snippet: and relies upon Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). In Bullington

Spaziano v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1983-05-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 433 So. 2d 508

Snippet: rule set out in Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). We reject this…conflicts with Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). Bullington

Dobbert v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1982-01-27T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 409 So. 2d 1053

Snippet: reliance upon Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), is without