Home
Jacksonville Location Phone Call/Texting Policy How do Fees Work?
Criminal Defense DUI Defense Foreclosure Defense Copyright Workers Compensation Attorney Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statutes Georgia Code Jacksonville Accident Attorney Real Estate Attorney Jacksonville Florida Criminal Lawyer Jacksonville Notary Public
Menu
904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 462.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 462.11 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 462.11

The 2023 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 462
NATUROPATHY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 462.11
462.11 Naturopaths to observe regulations.—Doctors of naturopathy shall observe and be subject to all state, county, and municipal regulations in regard to the control of contagious and infectious diseases, the reporting of births and deaths, and to any and all other matters pertaining to the public health in the same manner as is required of other practitioners of the healing art.
History.—s. 12, ch. 12286, 1927; CGL 3480; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 3, ch. 78-139; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 12, 13, ch. 85-303; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 462.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 462.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 462.11


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 462.11
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 462.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

U.S. Supreme Court11th Cir. - Ct. App.11th Cir. - MD FL11th Cir. - ND FL11th Cir. - SD FLFed. Reg.Secondary Sources - All

  1. Betancur v. State

    Case No. 4:06cv428-RH/WCS (N.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2008)
    FLA. STAT. § 462.023 (2007). Plaintiff's claim that Florida has "relinquished the power to regulate the profession of naturopathy" is legally false. Naturopathic physicians are not unregulated as FLA. STAT. § 462.11 provides:
    PAGE 9

    Cases from cite.case.law:

    In JANES, E. SPARKMAN, v. JANES,, 51 B.R. 932 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1985)

    . . . $25,000.00 in cash or in banks, the amount actually held in his name in his three checking accounts was $462.11 . . .

    v. W. S. v., 2 T.C. 949 (T.C. 1943)

    . . . for 1933, 1934, and 1935 to be in the sum of $634,651.13 in the case of Libbie Rice Farish and $670,-462.11 . . .