Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 463.013 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 463.013 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 463.013

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 463
OPTOMETRY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 463.013
463.013 Optometric services for certain public agencies.Any agency of the state or county or any commission, clinic, or board administering relief, social security, health insurance, or health service under the laws of the state shall accept the services of licensed practitioners for the purposes of diagnosing and correcting any and all visual, muscular, neurological, and anatomic anomalies of the human eyes and their appendages of any persons under the jurisdiction of said agency, clinic, commission, or board administering such relief, social security, health insurance, or health service on the same basis and on a parity with any other person authorized by law to render similar professional service, when such services are needed, and shall pay for such services in the same way as other professionals may be paid for similar services.
History.ss. 1, 6, ch. 79-194; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 13, 20, 21, ch. 86-289; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 463.013 on Google Scholar

F.S. 463.013 on Casetext

Amendments to 463.013


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 463.013
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 463.013.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 463.013

Total Results: 6

Pallas v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-05-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 636 So. 2d 1358

Snippet: U.S. 536, at 544-552, 85 S.Ct. [453], at 458-463 [, 13 L.Ed.2d 471], the Court considered in detail the

Hollinger v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-09-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 530 So. 2d 463, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2070, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3902, 1988 WL 89715

Snippet: , Daniel, Orfinger 1 September 1988 530 So. 2d 463, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2070, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3902,

Grubb v. City of Sebring

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-01-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 518 So. 2d 463, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 217, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 114

Snippet: Campbell, Frank, Hall 15 January 1988 518 So. 2d 463, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 217, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 114 Ronald

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1980-04-30T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: contradiction of the spirit, of not the letter, of s. 463.013, F. S., which provides in pertinent part that: …question to be faced here, however, is whether s. 463.013, F. S., acts to limit the division's discretionary…on an equal basis. The operative language of s. 463.013 states that `any agency of the state . . . administering…face and in its commonly understood meaning, s. 463.013 does not require the division to refer its clients…law was enacted during the 1979 session, and s. 463.013, F. S., thereof is virtually identical to the provision

Shepard v. Thames

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1971-07-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 251 So. 2d 265, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3470

Snippet: 298.67(2), 372.318, 382.25, 459.16, 460.15, 462.10, 463.13, 696.05(2), 698.11, 703.01, 703.02, 703.04, 703.05

Moore v. Thompson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1960-12-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 126 So. 2d 543

Snippet: 1937, 128 Fla. 424, 174 So. 854, 861, 111 A.L.R. 463. [13] Ibid and also see Levy v. Stone, 1929, 97 Fla