Florida Statute 467.014 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 467
MIDWIFERY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 467.014

467.014 Financial responsibility.—A licensed midwife shall include in the informed consent plan presented to the parents the status of the midwife’s malpractice insurance, including the amount of malpractice insurance, if any.

History.—ss. 10, 19, ch. 92-179; s. 79, ch. 2001-62.

F.S. 467.014 on Google Scholar

F.S. 467.014 on CourtListener

Amendments to 467.014

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 467.014

Total Results: 7

Florida State Board of Architecture v. Seymour

62 So. 2d 1, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1857

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1952 | Docket: 1251820

Cited 16 times | Published

power of the Board and the applicability of Section 467.14, Florida Statutes 1949, F.S.A., under which

Medlin v. Florida State Board of Architecture

382 So. 2d 708, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1979 | Docket: 64575619

Published

as an architect for 12 months for violating Section 467.14(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1977), which provides

Rifkin v. Florida Real Estate Commission

345 So. 2d 349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1977 | Docket: 64558342

Published

Accountants — Section 473.251(l)(d) Architects — Section 467.14(l)(b) Barbers — Section 476.14(1) & (10) Chiropractors

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 23, 1974 | Docket: 3255818

Published

Section 465.041(7) — State Board of Pharmacy. Section 467.14(5) — State Board of Architecture. Section 470

Floyd v. Florida State Board of Architecture

290 So. 2d 494, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1974 | Docket: 64537379

Published

“responsible supervising control,” in violation of F.S. § 467.14, F.S.A.1971, and of the rules of the Florida State

Markel v. Florida State Board of Architecture

268 So. 2d 374, 58 A.L.R. 3d 538, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3273

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1972 | Docket: 1477011

Published

nor a registered engineer, in violation of Section 467.14. In making his recommendation to the Board

Markel v. Florida State Board of Architecture

253 So. 2d 914, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1971 | Docket: 64522806

Published

challenged. The essence of his argument is that § 467.14 and § 467.15, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. are so vague and