CopyCited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1857
power of the Board and the applicability of Section 467.14, Florida Statutes 1949, F.S.A., under which
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5957
challenged. The essence of his argument is that § 467.14 and § 467.15, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. are so vague and
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 58 A.L.R. 3d 538, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3273
nor a registered engineer, in violation of Section 467.14. In making his recommendation to the Board
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16375
as an architect for 12 months for violating Section 467.14(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1977), which provides
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8005
“responsible supervising control,” in violation of F.S. § 467.14, F.S.A.1971, and of the rules of the Florida State
CopyAgo (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1974).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
Section 465.041(7) — State Board of Pharmacy. Section 467.14(5) — State Board of Architecture. Section 470
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
Accountants — Section 473.251(l)(d) Architects — Section 467.14(l)(b) Barbers — Section 476.14(1) & (10) Chiropractors