Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 486.123 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 486.123 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 486.123

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 486
PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 486.123
486.123 Sexual misconduct in the practice of physical therapy.The physical therapist-patient relationship is founded on mutual trust. Sexual misconduct in the practice of physical therapy means violation of the physical therapist-patient relationship through which the physical therapist uses that relationship to induce or attempt to induce the patient to engage, or to engage or attempt to engage the patient, in sexual activity outside the scope of practice or the scope of generally accepted examination or treatment of the patient. Sexual misconduct in the practice of physical therapy is prohibited.
History.s. 184, ch. 97-264.

F.S. 486.123 on Google Scholar

F.S. 486.123 on Casetext

Amendments to 486.123


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 486.123
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 486.123.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 486.123

Total Results: 8

Burton v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-09-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 107 So. 2d 140

Snippet: State ex rel. [Bradford] v. Stoutamire, 98 Fla. 486, 123 So. 834. See also, People v. Borgeson, 335 Ill

Anglin v. Mayo

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1956-07-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 88 So. 2d 918

Snippet: State ex rel. Bradford v. Stoutamire, 98 Fla. 486, 123 So. 834. See also, People v. Borgeson, 335 Ill

Brevard County v. Board of Public Instruction

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1947-12-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 33 So. 2d 54, 159 Fla. 869

Snippet: State ex rel. Bradford v. Stoutamire, 98 Fla. 486, 123 So. 834; Jernigan v. Holden et al., 34 Fla. 530

American Bakeries Co. v. City of Haines City

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1938-03-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 180 So. 524, 131 Fla. 790, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1486

Snippet: State, exrel. Bradford, v. Stoutamire, 98 Fla. 486, 123 So. 834, and cases therein cited; *Page 807 State…repealing clause. State v. Stoutamire, 98 Fla. 486,123 So. 834, and cases cited. And this may be true

State Ex Rel. Greeson v. Roberts

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-11-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 170 So. 457, 126 Fla. 114

Snippet: State, ex rel. Bradford, v Stoutamire,98 Fla. 486, 123 So. 834, and cases therein cited; State, ex rel

State Ex Rel. First Savings & Trust Co. v. Sholtz

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-09-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 169 So. 849, 125 Fla. 361

Snippet: repealing provision. State v. Stoutamire, 98 Fla. 486, 123 So. 834, and cases cited. This does not involve

Amos v. Mathews

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1930-01-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 126 So. 308, 99 Fla. 1

Snippet: ex rel. Bradford v. Stoutamire, Sheriff,98 Fla. 486, 123 So. R. 834. The provision in each act as to that

Amos v. Mathews

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1930-01-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 99 Fla. 115

Snippet: rel. Bradford v. Stoutamire, Sheriff, 98 Fla. 486, 123 So. R. 834. The provision in each act as to that