Florida Statute 506.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 506
STAMPED OR MARKED CONTAINERS AND BASKETS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 506.19

506.19 Protection of owners of marked or branded field boxes or other specified containers; recordation.—Any person who owns field boxes, pallets, crates, containers, or receptacles used in the general production, harvesting, packing, transportation, or marketing of fruits or vegetables or their byproducts or used for the storage or transport of agricultural or other commercial goods in this state may adopt for his or her exclusive use and ownership a mark or brand that designates or distinguishes his or her ownership and may identify his or her field boxes, pallets, crates, containers, or receptacles with a mark or brand using initials, symbols, designs, names, or any combination thereof, by plainly and distinctly stamping, stenciling, painting, cutting, etching, or burning the mark or brand into or upon both ends or sides of the field boxes, pallets, crates, receptacles, or containers. For purposes of any court or administrative proceeding, if a copy of the mark or brand is filed and recorded with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services pursuant to this chapter, the presence of this identifying mark or brand and the required registration number on any field box, pallet, crate, container, or receptacle is prima facie evidence of ownership.

History.—s. 1, ch. 16018, 1933; s. 1, ch. 16859, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 7087(1), (13); s. 1, ch. 67-18; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 72-47; s. 654, ch. 97-103; s. 1, ch. 2013-211.

F.S. 506.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 506.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 506.19

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 506.19

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 506.19.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 506.19

Total Results: 7

Brennan v. Brennan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-10-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 122 So. 3d 923, 2013 WL 5450946, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15519

Snippet: Husband was behind on payments in the amount of $18,506.19. Former Wife testified that the amount owed totaled

State Bd. of Trustees v. Key West Conch

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-06-19T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 683 So. 2d 144

Snippet: repealed. See Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506, 19 L.Ed. 264 (1868); State v. Tennyson, 212 Minn. …existed. See Ex Parte McCardle, 7 Wall. (74 U.S.) at 506, 19 L.Ed. 264; Yaffee v. Internat'l Co., 80 So.2d

Tooley v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-05-31T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 675 So. 2d 984

Snippet: closed. Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506, 7 Wall. 506, 19 L.Ed. 264 (1868); Ex parte Jerry, 294 Mich. 689

Evans Packing Co. v. Dept. of Agriculture

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-10-03T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 550 So. 2d 112

Snippet: dealing; or (g) Violated any of the provisions of ss. 506.19 through 506.28, both sections inclusive. [8] Section

Griffith v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1986-03-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 485 So. 2d 818

Snippet: reserved. Ex parte McCardle, [74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506, 19 L.Ed. 264 (1869)], is the historic illustration…Relying on Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506, 19 L.Ed. 264 (1869) (cited in De La Rama quote, supra

Appeal of Syracuse University

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-09-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 105 So. 2d 904

Snippet: Ex parte McCardle, 1869, 7 Wall. 506, 74 U.S. 506, 19 L.Ed. 264; and Gwin v. United States, 1902, 184

Dansey v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1887-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 23 Fla. 316

Snippet: Staley, 3 Lea, 565 ; State vs. Parnell, 16 Ark., 506 ; 19 Ark., 60 ; Hulstead vs. Commonwealth, 5 Leigh,