Florida Statute 506.513 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 506
STAMPED OR MARKED CONTAINERS AND BASKETS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 506.513

506.513 Illegal use of shopping carts and laundry carts.—It is a violation of ss. 506.501-506.519:

(1) To remove any shopping cart or laundry cart from the premises or parking area of a retail establishment with intent to deprive temporarily or permanently the owner of such cart, or the retailer, of possession of the cart.

(2) To remove a shopping cart or laundry cart, without written authorization, from its owner or from the premises or parking area of any retail establishment.

(3) To remove, obliterate, or alter any serial number or sign affixed to a shopping cart or laundry cart.

History.—s. 1, ch. 83-262.

F.S. 506.513 on Google Scholar

F.S. 506.513 on Casetext

Amendments to 506.513

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 506.513

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S506.513 - LARC - REMOVED - U: U

S506.513 1 - LARC - RMV SHOPPING LAUNDRY CART DEPRIVE OWNER - M: F

S506.513 1 - LARC - RMV SHOPPING LAUNDRY CART WIT DEPRIVE WO AUTH - M: F

S506.513 2 - LARC - RMV SHOPPING LAUNDRY CART WO WRITTEN AUTH OWN - M: F

S506.513 3 - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8061 - M: F

S506.513 3 - FORGERY OF - ALTER SERIAL NUMBER ON SHOPPING LAUNDRY CART - M: F

S506.513 3 - FORGERY - RMV OBLITERATE ETC SER NUMB SHOP LAUNDRY CART - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 506.513

Total Results: 20

Michael T. Rivera v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-25

Citation: 187 So. 3d 822, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 658, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2627

Snippet: merit. See Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 513 n. 10 (Fla.1999) (“Because we find the underlying

Hernandez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-05

Citation: 98 So. 3d 702, 2012 WL 4738862, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16943

Snippet: 865 (2011); United States v. Taylor, 248 F.3d 506, 513 (6th Cir.2001) (“[I]t follows logically that the

Caiazzo v. American Royal Arts Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-06-01

Citation: 73 So. 3d 245, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8078, 2011 WL 2135585

Snippet: 2002); Gorman v. Ameritrade Holding Corp., 293 F.3d 506, 513 (D.C.Cir.2002); Mink v. AAAA Dev. LLC, 190 F.3d

United States v. Morrison

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-12-31

Citation: 28 So. 3d 94, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20513

Snippet: " U.S. v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co., 309 U.S. 506, 513, 60 S.Ct. 653, 84 L.Ed. 894 (1940). There must

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2007-07-10

Snippet: Baskets, Boxes, and Containers Act."1 Section 506.513, Florida Statutes, makes it illegal "[t]o remove

Zuckerman v. Robinson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-06-11

Citation: 846 So. 2d 1257, 2003 WL 21347199

Snippet: Florida Southern Ry. Co. v. Hirst, 30 Fla. 1, 11 So. 506, 513 (1892); McRoberts, 149 So. at 635. Punitive damages

Rose v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-10-12

Citation: 774 So. 2d 629, 2000 WL 1508576

Snippet: Ed.2d 674 (1984). See Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 513 n. 10 (Fla.1999); Mills v. State, 684 So.2d 801

Sireci v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-09-07

Citation: 773 So. 2d 34, 2000 WL 1259723

Snippet: is time-barred. See Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 513 (Fla.1999)(recognizing January 1, 1987, as the

Way v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-04-20

Citation: 760 So. 2d 903, 2000 WL 422869

Snippet: Ed.2d 674 (1984). See Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 513 n. 10 (Fla.1999); Mills v. State, 684 So.2d 801

Patterson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-03-08

Citation: 760 So. 2d 161, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2249, 2000 WL 257830

Snippet: discovered evidence. See Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 513 (Fla.1999). Patterson also argues that the evidence

Gomez v. Singletary

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-24

Citation: 733 So. 2d 499, 1998 WL 892663

Snippet: Department of Corrections v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499, 506-513, 115 S.Ct. 1597, 131 L.Ed.2d 588 (1995), remains

Eichenbaum v. Rossland Real Estate, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-02-25

Citation: 502 So. 2d 1333, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 623, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6904

Snippet: Florida Southern Ry. v. Hirst, 30 Fla. 1, 11 So. 506, 513 (1892), stated that the character of negligence

Rupp v. Bryant

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-15

Citation: 417 So. 2d 658, 35 A.L.R. 4th 253

Snippet: Florida Southern Ry. v. Hirst, 30 Fla. 1, 39, 11 So. 506, 513 (1892). The facts here alleged simply cannot support

Ford Motor Co. v. Hill

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-07-23

Citation: 404 So. 2d 1049, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2786

Snippet: v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 162 Mont. 506, 513 P.2d 268 (1973); Hancock v. Paccar, Inc., 204

Ingram v. Pettit

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-09

Citation: 340 So. 2d 922

Snippet: Florida Southern Ry. Co. v. Hirst, 30 Fla. 1, 11 So. 506, 513 (1892). [7] See, Carraway v. Revell, 116 So.2d

West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-07-21

Citation: 336 So. 2d 80, 24 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1154

Snippet: Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, 162 Mont. 506, 513 P.2d 268 (1973); New Hampshire, Buttrick v. Arthur

Ford Motor Company v. Evancho

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-02-11

Citation: 327 So. 2d 201, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4382

Snippet: v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 162 Mont. 506, 513 P.2d 268 (1973); Bolm v. Triumph Corp., 41 A.D

Acosta v. Daughtry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-09-19

Citation: 268 So. 2d 416

Snippet: Florida So. Ry. Co. v. Hirst, 30 Fla. 1, 11 So. 506, 513: "... we have not lost sight of the fact that

Johnson v. Rinesmith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-08-19

Citation: 238 So. 2d 659

Snippet: So. Ry. Co. v. Hirst, 1892, 30 Fla. 1, 11 So. 506, 513. We conclude, therefore, that the law of Florida

Lesperance v. Lesperance

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-03-24

Citation: 233 So. 2d 859, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6738

Snippet: 354, 176 N.E. 340; Allore v. Jewell, 94 U.S. 506-513, 24 L.Ed. 260, pages 263, 264; 12 R.C.L. 972; Black