Florida Statute 506.514 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 506
STAMPED OR MARKED CONTAINERS AND BASKETS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 506.514

506.514 Unlawful removal of dairy cases.—It is a violation of ss. 506.501-506.519 for any person not in lawful possession of a dairy case to remove a dairy case from the premises, the parking area, or any other area of any retail establishment, or from any dairy delivery vehicle, if:

(1) The dairy case is marked on at least two sides with a registered name or mark; and

(2) A notice to the public, warning that use by any person other than the registered owner is punishable by law, is visibly displayed on the dairy case.

History.—s. 1, ch. 83-262.

F.S. 506.514 on Google Scholar

F.S. 506.514 on Casetext

Amendments to 506.514

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 506.514

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S506.514 - LARC - REMOVE DAIRY CASE MARKED WITH WARNING - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 506.514

Total Results: 10

INSPIRED CAPITAL, LLC, etc. v. STEVEN HOWELL

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-08-02T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 5 Holdings, Inc., 74 So. 3d 506, 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (determining lost market

STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM v. AMAURY ALBERTO

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-10-19T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: t of Children & Family Servs., 873 So. 2d 506, 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (noting that, in evaluating

ANAMARIE M. SCHROEDER A/K/A ANAMARIA M. SCHROEDER, etc. v. MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-02-11T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Fla. 1986) (quoting Ex Parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506, 514 (1868)). While subject matter jurisdiction “concerns

HEATH TRERICE, individually and in his derivative capacity, etc. v. HOWARD TRERICE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-06-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Fla. 1986) (quoting Ex Parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506, 514 (1868)). The loss of “jurisdiction” we are

Victoriana Building, LLC v. Ft. Lauderdale Surgical Center, etc., Southern Medical, etc., Risk And Capital Limited Partnership, etc., Christopher Brooks, etc., Darla Holdings, etc., Eric Chenven, etc., Caryn Chenven, etc., Neil Weisman, etc., Karolyn Weisman, etc., Sheridan Health Corp., Inc., etc. and Sabine Hesse, etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-20T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Inc. v. Firstate Ins. Holdings, Inc., 74 So. 3d 506, 514- 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“It is as inappropriate

Victoriana Building, LLC v. Ft. Lauderdale Surgical Center, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 166 So. 3d 861

Snippet: Inc. v. Firstate Ins. Holdings, Inc., 74 So.3d 506, 514-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“It is as inappropriate

In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business Cases

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-06-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 116 So. 3d 284

Snippet: Inc. v. Firstate Ins. Holdings, Inc., 74 So.3d 506, 514 n. 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (discussing various approaches

Russell v. KSL Hotel Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-09-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 887 So. 2d 372

Snippet: Racial Equality v. City of St. Louis, 549 F.2d 506, 514 (8th Cir.1977)). When all of the alleged instances

Thompson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-04-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 759 So. 2d 650

Snippet: procedurally barred. See Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 514 (Fla.1999). [7] Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83

State Ex Rel. Arnold v. Revels

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1959-02-12T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 109 So. 2d 1

Snippet: as stated in Ex parte McCardle, 1868, 7 Wall. 506, 514, 19 L.Ed.2d 264, "Without jurisdiction the