Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 506.517 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 506.517 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 506.517

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 506
STAMPED OR MARKED CONTAINERS AND BASKETS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 506.517
506.517 Deposits.The requiring, taking, or accepting of any deposit upon delivery of any shopping cart, laundry cart, dairy case, egg basket, poultry box, or bakery container shall not be deemed a sale thereof, optional or otherwise.
History.s. 1, ch. 83-262; s. 9, ch. 87-80.

F.S. 506.517 on Google Scholar

F.S. 506.517 on Casetext

Amendments to 506.517


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 506.517
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 506.517.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 506.517

Total Results: 13

Foster v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-10-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 132 So. 3d 40, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 756, 2013 WL 5659482, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2287

Snippet: amp; n. 8 (Fla.2000); Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 n. 5 (Fla.1999); San Martin v. State, 705 So.2d

Chavez v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2009-06-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 12 So. 3d 199, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 383, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 977, 2009 WL 1792963

Snippet: amp; n. 8 (Fla. 2000); Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 n. 5 (Fla.1999); San Martin v. State, 705 So.2d

Evans v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2006-10-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 946 So. 2d 1

Snippet: and on direct appeal); Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 (Fla.1999) (finding that claim of Espinosa error

Gamble v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-05-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 877 So. 2d 706

Snippet: deficient."); see also Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 (Fla.1999). In Downs, the defendant's post-conviction

Thomas v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2003-01-29T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 838 So. 2d 535

Snippet: 665 (Fla.2000); *542 Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 (Fla. 1999). Applying the Stephens standard of…650, 665 (Fla.2000); Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 (Fla. 1999). Hence, Defendant is unable to demonstrate

Anderson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-06-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 822 So. 2d 1261

Snippet: to foresee Koon. Cf. Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 n. 18 (Fla.1999) (holding appellate counsel not

Sweet v. Moore

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-06-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 822 So. 2d 1269

Snippet: 644 & n. 8; Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 n. 5 (Fla.1999); San Martin v. State, 705 So.2d

Morrison v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-03-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 818 So. 2d 432

Snippet: as worded. See also Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 (Fla.1999) (holding claim that three statutory

Floyd v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-01-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 808 So. 2d 175

Snippet: issue on appeal. See Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 (Fla. 1999); Lambrix v. Singletary, 641 So.2d

Ventura v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2001-05-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 794 So. 2d 553

Snippet: direct appeal. See, e.g., Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 (Fla.1999). On appeal, Ventura attempts to circumvent

Porter v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2001-05-03T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 788 So. 2d 917

Snippet: on direct appeal. See Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 (Fla.1999). We will discuss the remaining issues

Rutherford v. Moore

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-10-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 774 So. 2d 637

Snippet: 1998). [8] See, e.g., Downs v. State, 740 So.2d 506, 517 n. 5 (Fla.1999); Demps v. Dugger, 714 So.2d 365

Demarigny v. Demarigny

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1949-12-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 43 So. 2d 442

Snippet: parties. Forsyth v. [City of] Hammond, 166 U.S. 506, 517, 17 S.Ct. 665, 670, 41 L.Ed. 1095; Chicago Life