Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 518.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 518.08 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 518.08

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 518
INVESTMENT OF FIDUCIARY FUNDS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 518.08
518.08 Applicability of laws requiring security, etc.No law of this state requiring security upon which loans or investments may be made, prescribing the nature, amount, or form of such security, prescribing or limiting interest rates upon loans or investments, limiting investments of capital or deposits, or prescribing or limiting the period for which loans or investments may be made, shall be deemed to apply to loans or investments made pursuant to ss. 518.06 and 518.07.
History.s. 3, ch. 17130, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 7100(3).

F.S. 518.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 518.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 518.08


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 518.08
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 518.08.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 518.08

Total Results: 3

Mardorff v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-05-21

Citation: 196 So. 625, 143 Fla. 64, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1158

Snippet: the crime. In Hall v. State, 78 Fla. 420, 83 So. 518, 8 A. L. R. 1234, the prosecution offered in evidence

Banning v. Brown

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-01-19

Citation: 73 Fla. 54, 74 So. 23

Snippet: if improperly taken. Warner v. Watson, 27 Fla. 518, 8 South. Rep. 842; Dell v. Martin, 31 Fla. 152, 12

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Welch

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-01-15

Citation: 53 Fla. 145

Snippet: allegation.” See also the same case reported in 67 Cal. 518, 8 Pac. Rep. 174, where it is ■held that evidence