Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 520.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 520.01 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 520.01

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 520
RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 520.01
520.01 Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act.Sections 520.01-520.10, 520.12, 520.125, and 520.13 may be cited as “The Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act.”
History.s. 14, ch. 57-799; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 21, ch. 80-256; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 1, 35, 36, ch. 90-103; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 520.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 520.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 520.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 520.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 520.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 520.01

Total Results: 18

Burgos v. Sequeira, Vargas

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: to the North Carolina court based on section 61.520(1), Florida Statutes (2024), ruling that North Carolina…another state is a more appropriate forum." § 61.520(1). But before making this determination, the trial…order relinquishing jurisdiction under section 61.520(1). See M.N., 199 So. 3d at 455-56 ("[T]he trial

PAUL ERNEST VARCHETTI v. JULIE ANNE VARCHETTI

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-08-26T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: another state is a more appropriate forum.” § 61.520(1), Fla. Stat. (2019). Wife cites rule 12.140(b)(3…another state is a more appropriate forum. § 61.520(1), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). “The issue of inconvenient

WAED JAMIL AWAD v. BASHIR M. NOUFAL

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-09-13T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: state is a more appropriate forum." § 61.520(1). Here, the trial court acknowledged

Destefanis v. Tan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-08-02T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: another state is a more appropriate forum.” § 61.520(1). Section 61.520(2) requires the court to consider

Haugabook v. Jeffcoat-Hultberg

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-12-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 219 So. 3d 65, 2016 WL 8303559, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19023

Snippet: So.3d 749, 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (quoting § 61.520(1), Fla. Stat. (2010)). However, an order declining

Bull Motors, LLC v. Brown

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-11-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 152 So. 3d 32, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18103, 2014 WL 5654266

Snippet: Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act, section 520.01 et seq. Both of these claims were dismissed before

KI v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-10-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 70 So. 3d 749, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15738, 2011 WL 4578271

Snippet: another state is a more appropriate forum." § 61.520(1), Fla. Stat. (2010).[3] The transfer of a case from…statutory procedures and considerations. See § 61.520(1), (2)(a)-(h). The Florida trial court considered

De La Mora v. Andonie

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-12-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 51 So. 3d 517, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19096, 2010 WL 5093142

Snippet: following two separate and independent scenarios: *520 1. Where the owner of the property is a permanent

Ernie Haire Ford, Inc. v. Gilley

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-02-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 903 So. 2d 956

Snippet: Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act, section 520.01, Florida Statutes (2002); and count three, negligence

Amendment to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-05-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 875 So. 2d 448, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 379, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 677, 2004 WL 1119496

Snippet: ubjectshall conform to the requirements of this rule. *520(1) Prohibited Content. Television and radio advertisements

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-05-13T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: the Public Records Act, Ch. 119, F.S. Section 316.520(1), F.S., provides that No vehicle shall be driven

Lawyer's Title Insurance v. City of West Palm Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-08-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 402 So. 2d 544, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20818

Snippet: of a license tax by a municipality, Section 624.520(1), Florida Statutes (1979), provides: This state … into the tax categories listed in Section 624.-520(1) is not keyed into “premiums, income, or volume

Mallard v. Tele-Trip Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-05-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 398 So. 2d 969

Snippet: exempt from any ad valorem tax based on Section 624.520(1), Florida Statutes (1971), which states: 624.520…punctuation utilized by the legislature in Section 624.520(1), Florida Statutes *972 (1971), seems to militate…income, or volume of transactions... ." § 624.520(1), Fla. Stat. (1971). "[U]nder the `doctrine…of an insurer within the meaning of Section 624.520(1), Florida Statutes (1971). The record reveals that

General Finance Corp. of Jacksonville v. Stratton

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-10-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 156 So. 2d 664, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3165

Snippet: . F.S. Section 520.11, F.S.A. . F.S. Sections 520.01-520.13, F.S.A. . F.S. Section 520.11(1), F.S.

Cox v. La Pota

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-12-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 76 So. 2d 662

Snippet: . Lente v. Clarke, Adm'x, 22 Fla. 515, text 520, 1 So. 149." The description set forth in the

Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1931-11-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 138 So. 44, 103 Fla. 633

Snippet: complainant. Venable v. Dutch, 37 Kan. 515, 15 P. 520, 1 Am. St. Rep. 260. A counterclaim is the equivalent

Dibble v. Truluck

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1867-07-01T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 11 Fla. 135

Snippet: support the verdict, Bailey vs. Clark, 6 Fla. Rep., 520; 1 Call Rep., 28; 4 Rand. Rep., 317. The law having

Lines v. Darden

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1853-01-15T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 5 Fla. 51

Snippet: Morice vs. the Bishop of Durham, 10 Vesey Ch. R., 520, one of the leading cases, the Lord Chancellor says