Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 18
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-16T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: to the North Carolina court based on section 61.520(1), Florida Statutes (2024), ruling that North Carolina…another state is a more appropriate forum." § 61.520(1). But before making this determination, the trial…order relinquishing jurisdiction under section 61.520(1). See M.N., 199 So. 3d at 455-56 ("[T]he trial
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-08-26T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: another state is a more appropriate forum.” § 61.520(1), Fla. Stat. (2019). Wife cites rule 12.140(b)(3…another state is a more appropriate forum. § 61.520(1), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). “The issue of inconvenient
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-09-13T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: state is a more appropriate forum." § 61.520(1). Here, the trial court acknowledged
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-08-02T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: another state is a more appropriate forum.” § 61.520(1). Section 61.520(2) requires the court to consider
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-12-22T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 219 So. 3d 65, 2016 WL 8303559, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19023
Snippet: So.3d 749, 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (quoting § 61.520(1), Fla. Stat. (2010)). However, an order declining
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-11-05T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 152 So. 3d 32, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18103, 2014 WL 5654266
Snippet: Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act, section 520.01 et seq. Both of these claims were dismissed before
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-10-05T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 70 So. 3d 749, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15738, 2011 WL 4578271
Snippet: another state is a more appropriate forum." § 61.520(1), Fla. Stat. (2010).[3] The transfer of a case from…statutory procedures and considerations. See § 61.520(1), (2)(a)-(h). The Florida trial court considered
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-12-15T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 51 So. 3d 517, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19096, 2010 WL 5093142
Snippet: following two separate and independent scenarios: *520 1. Where the owner of the property is a permanent
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-02-17T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 903 So. 2d 956
Snippet: Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act, section 520.01, Florida Statutes (2002); and count three, negligence
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-05-20T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 875 So. 2d 448, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 379, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 677, 2004 WL 1119496
Snippet: ubjectshall conform to the requirements of this rule. *520(1) Prohibited Content. Television and radio advertisements
Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-05-13T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: the Public Records Act, Ch. 119, F.S. Section 316.520(1), F.S., provides that No vehicle shall be driven
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-08-19T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 402 So. 2d 544, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20818
Snippet: of a license tax by a municipality, Section 624.520(1), Florida Statutes (1979), provides: This state … into the tax categories listed in Section 624.-520(1) is not keyed into “premiums, income, or volume
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-05-13T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 398 So. 2d 969
Snippet: exempt from any ad valorem tax based on Section 624.520(1), Florida Statutes (1971), which states: 624.520…punctuation utilized by the legislature in Section 624.520(1), Florida Statutes *972 (1971), seems to militate…income, or volume of transactions... ." § 624.520(1), Fla. Stat. (1971). "[U]nder the `doctrine…of an insurer within the meaning of Section 624.520(1), Florida Statutes (1971). The record reveals that
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-10-08T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 156 So. 2d 664, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3165
Snippet: . F.S. Section 520.11, F.S.A. . F.S. Sections 520.01-520.13, F.S.A. . F.S. Section 520.11(1), F.S.
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-12-20T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 76 So. 2d 662
Snippet: . Lente v. Clarke, Adm'x, 22 Fla. 515, text 520, 1 So. 149." The description set forth in the
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1931-11-20T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 138 So. 44, 103 Fla. 633
Snippet: complainant. Venable v. Dutch, 37 Kan. 515, 15 P. 520, 1 Am. St. Rep. 260. A counterclaim is the equivalent
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1867-07-01T00:00:02-07:52:58
Citation: 11 Fla. 135
Snippet: support the verdict, Bailey vs. Clark, 6 Fla. Rep., 520; 1 Call Rep., 28; 4 Rand. Rep., 317. The law having
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1853-01-15T00:00:02-07:52:58
Citation: 5 Fla. 51
Snippet: Morice vs. the Bishop of Durham, 10 Vesey Ch. R., 520, one of the leading cases, the Lord Chancellor says