Syfert Injury Law Firm

and SC14-1952 Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida and Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-21

Citation: 191 So. 3d 370, 2016 WL 1592703

Snippet: imposed lesser sanctions.” Nezi, 119 So. 3d at 522. 5. In DeLuise, the trial court offered to mitigate

Vanslyke v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-09-13

Citation: 936 So. 2d 1218, 2006 WL 2614261

Snippet: entry into the home to provide that aid." Id. at 522.[5] In the instant case—unlike Boggess—the record

Adderly v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-12-19

Citation: 803 So. 2d 811, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17895, 2001 WL 1613871

Snippet: range under the 1995 guidelines was 313.5 months to 522.5 months. Under the re-scored 1994 guidelines the

In Re Hill

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-06-26

Citation: 582 So. 2d 701, 1991 WL 115160

Snippet: 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965). [4] 537 So.2d at 520-522. [5] The first of the three principal cases leading

United Gas Pipeline Company v. Gulf Power Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-06-10

Citation: 334 So. 2d 310, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15714

Snippet: Light Company v. Elmore, 1966, Fla.App., 189 So.2d 522)."[5] United next argues that it is entitled to indemnification

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-07-19

Snippet: credit of the General Revenue Fund. Section 624.522(5)(a), F.S. The history of Ch. 205, F.S., in relation

State v. Allen

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-03-08

Citation: 196 So. 2d 745

Snippet: [3] Fla. 1966, 181 So.2d 521. [4] Ibid, p. 522. [5] Greyhound Corp. v. Carswell, note 2, 181 So.2d

Armstrong v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-05-17

Citation: 85 Fla. 126, 95 So. 506

Snippet: 765; Mobile *141& M. Ry. Co. v. Gilmer, 85 Ala. 522, 5 South. Rep. 138; Gilmer v. Mobile & M. Ry. Co.

Hogans v. Carruth

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1882-01-15

Citation: 18 Fla. 587

Snippet: Ala., 300; 2 Ala., 203; 51 Ala., 340; 4 Blackf., 522; 5 ib., 79.) Where a different rule prevails it is

Sanderson's Administrators v. Sanderson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1880-06-15

Citation: 17 Fla. 820

Snippet: no necessity for a cross-bill-. (Story Equity, §522; 5 Leigh, 561.) So far as the matter of the supplemental