Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 550.001 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 550.001 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 550.001

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 550
PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 550.001
550.001 Short title.This chapter may be cited as the “Florida Pari-mutuel Wagering Act.”
History.s. 2, ch. 92-348.

F.S. 550.001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 550.001 on Casetext

Amendments to 550.001


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 550.001
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 550.001.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 550.001

Total Results: 20

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-11-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 131 So. 3d 643

Snippet: 50-550,000 b_Homestead residential foreclosure 550,001-5249,999 *685e_Homestead residential foreclosure

Okaloosa New Opportunity, LLC v. LD Projects, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-03-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 109 So. 3d 1209

Snippet: judgments and collection thereon, see Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.550-1.570, there are no rules that assist an attorney

Hood v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-10-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 72 So. 3d 273

Snippet: I did receive paperwork stating I owed the 550 on the one claim and $50 on the one determination and

B & I Contractors, Inc. v. Mel Re Construction Management

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-08-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 66 So. 3d 1035

Snippet: judgments and collection thereon, see Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.550-1.570, there are no rules that assist an attorney

Kozich v. Keller

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-10-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 10 So. 3d 1102

Snippet: Florida Rules *1103 of Civil Procedure 1.540, 1.550, and 1.560, was itself a violation of the 1998 judgment

SEC. Bank v. Bellsouth Adv. & Pub. Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-07-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 679 So. 2d 795

Snippet: . Chatelier's Plant Food Co., 350 So.2d at 550, 1 Stephen B. Rakusin, Florida Creditors' Rights

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1994-01-04T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: conduct of pari-mutuel wagering." 3 Section 550.001, Fla. Stat. (1993). 4 See, e.g., s. 550.0951(1)

In Re Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1991-08-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 584 So. 2d 964

Snippet: 974 determine incapacity as described in FPR 5.550. (1) A copy of the petition and notice of hearing shall

Constantine v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-08-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 566 So. 2d 321

Snippet: , 466 So.2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). . Ch. 84-550, § 1, Laws of Fla. No. 90-01611 District

Scharfschwerdt v. Kanarek

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-11-07T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 553 So. 2d 218

Snippet: limitations on or before December 31, 1984. See Ch. 84-550, § 1, Laws of Fla. A law falls within the ex post facto

In re Amendment to Florida Probate Rule—Part III (Guardianship)

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-09-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 551 So. 2d 452

Snippet: to determine incapacity as described in FPR 5.550. (1) A copy of the petition and notice of hearing shall

DuBreuil v. Regnvall

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-05-31T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 527 So. 2d 249

Snippet: of a final recorded judgment. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.550.[1] But, reluctantly following Murphy, *250 we perpetuate

Rodriguez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-11-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 441 So. 2d 1129

Snippet: existence. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.550[1] and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.691[2]

Belvedere Dev. Corp. v. DIV. OF ADMIN., ETC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-05-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 413 So. 2d 847

Snippet: parcels 110 and 111, as of December 4, 1972, was $6,550 and $1,400, respectively. The property owner-appellants

Belvedere Development Corp. v. Division of Administration, State Department of Transportation

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-05-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 413 So. 2d 847, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20670

Snippet: parcels 110 and 111, as of December 4, 1972, was $6,550 and $1,400, respectively. The property owner-appellants

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1981-08-04T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: construed as mandatory. Lomelo v. Mayo, 204 So.2d 550 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1967); Neal v. Bryant, supra. Had

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1980-12-04T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: specified. See generally Lomelo v. Mayo, 204 So.2d 550 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1967); cf. City of St. Petersburg

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1977-11-01T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: legislative intent is manifest. Lomelo v. Mayo,204 So.2d 550 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1967). The word `may' commonly

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1977-02-08T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: contemplated purchase. Sections 550.13, 550.14, and 550.01, et seq., F. S., which were mentioned in the above

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1976-10-14T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: be derived from the general statutes cited. [s. 550.01(1) and s. 550.02(4), F. S.] The Due Process Clauses