Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 551.101 (2025)

Slot machine gaming authorized.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

551.101 Slot machine gaming authorized.—Any licensed pari-mutuel facility located in Miami-Dade County or Broward County existing at the time of adoption of s. 23, Art. X of the State Constitution that has conducted live racing or games during calendar years 2002 and 2003 may possess slot machines and conduct slot machine gaming at the location where the pari-mutuel permitholder is authorized to conduct pari-mutuel wagering activities pursuant to such permitholder’s valid pari-mutuel permit provided that a majority of voters in a countywide referendum have approved slot machines at such facility in the respective county. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is not a crime for a person to participate in slot machine gaming at a pari-mutuel facility licensed to possess slot machines and conduct slot machine gaming or to participate in slot machine gaming described in this chapter.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2005-362; s. 129, ch. 2007-5.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2011–2016 · leading case: Florida Gaming Centers, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 71 So. 3d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Florida Gaming Centers, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 71 So. 3d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). “Section 551.101, entitled “Slot machine gaming authorized,” mirrored the language of Article X, section 23.”

Gretna Racing, LLC v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 178 So. 3d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). · cites it 6× “§ 551.101, Fla. Stat; Ch. 2005-362, § 1, Laws of Fla.”

Gretna Racing, LLC. v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof. etc. (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). · cites it 6× “§ 551.101, Fla. Stat.; Ch. 2005-362, § 1, Laws of Fla.”

FLORIDA GAMING v. Dep't, 71 So. 3d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). “Section 551.101, entitled "Slot machine gaming authorized," mirrored the language of Article X, section 23.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.