Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 568.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 568.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 568.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Chapter 568
INTOXICATING LIQUORS IN COUNTIES WHERE PROHIBITED
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 568.09
568.09 Holding federal license or tax stamp prima facie evidence.The holding, owning, having in possession, or paying for a license or tax stamp issued by the internal revenue authorities of the United States showing the payment of a tax as a dealer in intoxicating liquors, wines, or beer, by the holder thereof to the United States Government shall be held in all the courts of this state as prima facie evidence against the holder thereof in prosecution of such holder for violation of this chapter and upon proof being made by the certificate of the collector of internal revenue, as provided for by the federal statute, in cases where the proper prosecuting officers shall produce said certificate or certified copy, the grand jury may indict the holder of such license or tax stamp or the proper prosecuting officer may file information against the holder of such license or tax stamp without further proof, charging such holder with the violation of this chapter, and upon the trial of persons charged with the violation of this chapter, upon information or indictment proof of the owning, holding, or possession of such license or tax stamp by the defendant may be made by two witnesses who have seen such license or tax stamp in the place of business or the holder thereof, or by the production of the original tax stamp or license with proof that said license or tax stamp is the property of the defendant by one or more witnesses, or by production by the prosecuting officer of a certified copy of said license, tax stamp or certificate of the Collector of Internal Revenue of the United States; and proof having been made as provided in this section, it shall be sufficient evidence, without explanation, to convict.
History.s. 9, ch. 18016, 1937; CGL 1940 Supp. 7648(18).

F.S. 568.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 568.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 568.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 568.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 568.09.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 568.09

Total Results: 10

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-03.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-09-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 253 So. 3d 995

Snippet: PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION § 817.568(9), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of [Fraudulent…COUNTERFEIT PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION - 817.568(9) CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS. NO. None

STATE OF FLORIDA v. FRANKLIN JONES

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-11-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 230 So. 3d 22

Snippet: Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 168-169, 83 S.Ct. 554, 567-568, 9 L.Ed.2d 644 (1963), provide useful guideposts,

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—REPORT 2016-03

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-10-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 202 So. 3d 830

Snippet: PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION § 817.568(9), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of [Fraudulent

State v. Converse

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-01-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 78 So. 3d 78, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 672, 2012 WL 162031

Snippet: Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 168-169, 83 S.Ct. 554, 567-568, 9 L.Ed.2d 644 (1963), provide useful guideposts,

Standard Jury Inst. in Cr. Cases No. 2006-2

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2007-07-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 962 So. 2d 310

Snippet: COUNTERFEIT PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION § 817.568(9), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Fraudulent [Creation… INFORMATION — 817.568(9) -----------------------------------------------

STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Goad

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-03-12T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 754 So. 2d 95

Snippet: Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 168-169, 83 S.Ct. 554, 567-568, 9 L.Ed.2d 644 (1963), the Court in Hudson listed

State v. Knowles

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-10-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 625 So. 2d 88

Snippet: Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 167-170, 83 S.Ct. 554, 567-568, 9 L.Ed.2d 644 (1963), lists seven factors to be considered

State v. Counts

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-10-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 457 So. 2d 568, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2151, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15387

Snippet: Cobb, Orfinger, Sharp 11 October 1984 457 So. 2d 568, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2151, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15387

Atkinson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-09-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 456 So. 2d 568, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2087, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15232

Snippet: Cowart, Dauksch, Sharp 27 September 1984 456 So. 2d 568, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2087, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15232

Walters v. Sheffield

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1918-04-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 75 Fla. 505, 78 So. 539

Snippet: 18 Barb. (N. Y.) 484; Notes to 116 Am. St. Rep. 568; 9 R. C. L. pp. 831, 833. Ejectment lies to recover