Florida Statute 569.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO

Chapter 569
TOBACCO AND NICOTINE PRODUCTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 569.35

569.35 Retail nicotine product dealers; administrative penalties.—The division may suspend or revoke the permit of a dealer, including the retail tobacco products dealer permit of a retail tobacco products dealer as defined in s. 569.002(4), upon sufficient cause appearing of the violation of any of the provisions of this part, by a dealer, or by a dealer’s agent or employee. The division may also assess and accept an administrative fine of up to $1,000 against a dealer for each violation. The division shall deposit all fines collected into the General Revenue Fund as collected. An order imposing an administrative fine becomes effective 15 days after the date of the order. The division may suspend the imposition of a penalty against a dealer, conditioned upon the dealer’s compliance with terms the division considers appropriate.

History.—s. 25, ch. 2021-14.

F.S. 569.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 569.35 on Casetext

Amendments to 569.35

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 569.35

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 569.35.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 569.35

Total Results: 4

Concrete Systems, Inc. v. Florida Electric Co. of Orlando

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-01-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 425 So. 2d 632, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18474

Snippet: Florida Electric sued Concrete Systems for $17,-569.35, representing the unpaid balance of the contract

Smith v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1978-12-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 364 So. 2d 876, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17088

Snippet: their witnesses.’ In re Imbler, 60 Cal.2d 554, 569, 35 Cal.Rptr. 293, 301, 387 P.2d 6, 14 (1963). And

Perez v. Perez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-05-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 164 So. 2d 561

Snippet: see Gilbert v. David, supra, 235 U.S. at page 569, 35 S.Ct. at page 166. If the new state is to be one

Reinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-10-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 150 So. 266, 112 Fla. 267

Snippet: Coke Rates" in the Southeast, Docket No. 569, 35 I.C.C. Report 187, as follows: "It may be