Florida Statute 583.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 583
CLASSIFICATION AND SALE OF EGGS AND POULTRY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 583.02

583.02 Labeling, marking, and advertising eggs; sales between dealers; unlawful acts.—It is unlawful for any dealer:

(1) To offer for sale or sell in this state any case, partial case, or carton containing eggs which is not labeled with the date of pack; grade; size; and name and address of the packer, distributor, or dealer. However, the department may permit a dealer to sell or consign eggs to another dealer in this state without labeling provided such eggs are accompanied by a proper bill of lading, and provided further that the consignee, upon receipt of the eggs and prior to selling or offering them for sale, affixes to each case the labeling required by this chapter.

(2) To offer for sale or sell eggs in bulk (not in cases or cartons) from any open case, box, basket, or other receptacle holding such eggs in bulk without displaying conspicuously on every such case, box, basket, or other receptacle a placard or heavy cardboard not smaller than 7 inches by 7 inches in size, on which shall be legibly and plainly printed, in letters not smaller than 1 inch in height, wording showing whether the eggs offered for sale or sold are “cold storage eggs,” “unclassified eggs,” or “graded eggs,” and also stating the grade and size to which the eggs contained therein conform.

(3) To offer eggs for sale in any newspaper advertisement, circular, radio, or other form of advertising without plainly designating in such advertisement the grade and size to which the eggs being offered for sale properly belong.

(4) To use the name, logo, or certificate or permit number of the department on any egg or poultry advertisement or packaging material without written approval from the department.

History.—s. 2, ch. 16012, 1933; ss. 2, 3, ch. 16982, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4126(2),(3); s. 2, ch. 57-151; s. 2, ch. 61-413; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 2, ch. 73-81; s. 2, ch. 84-102.

F.S. 583.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 583.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 583.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 583.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S583.02 1 - FOOD-MISBRANDED - SELL IMPROPERLY LABELED EGGS - M: S

S583.02 2 - FOOD-MISBRANDED - SELL BULK EGGS WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION - M: S

S583.02 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - ADVERTISE EGGS WITHOUT GRADE AND SIZE INFO - M: S

S583.02 4 - FRAUD - USE NAME ON POULTRY AD OR PACKAGE WO APPROVAL - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 583.02

Total Results: 7

GRANVILLE WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-24

Snippet: “[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law . . . .” § 943.0583(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). The State attached the

M.G. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-24

Citation: 260 So. 3d 1094

Snippet: reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See § 943.0583(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). However, to the extent such

M.G. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-24

Citation: 260 So. 3d 1094

Snippet: reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See § 943.0583(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). However, to the extent such

M.G. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-24

Snippet: reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See § 943.0583(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). However, to the extent

State v. Riley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-01-04

Citation: 648 So. 2d 825, 1995 WL 1710

Snippet: for purposes of a State appeal... ." 630 So.2d at 583.[2] The refusal to make habitual offender findings

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1983-11-02

Snippet: 588 (Fla. 1956); Fox v. Fratello, 308 So.2d 581, 583 (2 D.C.A.Fla., 1975); see also, Banana River Properties

CA Fielland Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-05-08

Citation: 297 So. 2d 122, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6809

Snippet: v. Royal Indem. Company, 1960, 177 Cal. App.2d 583, 2 Cal. Rptr. 329. A contrary holding would have the