Florida Statute 593.109 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 593
AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY INSECT CONTROL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 593.109

593.109 Authority to designate eradication zones, prohibit planting of cotton, and require participation in eradication program.—

(1) The department shall designate by rule one or more areas of this state as “eradication zones” where boll weevil eradication programs will be undertaken. The department shall promulgate rules regarding areas where cotton may not be planted within an eradication zone if the department has reason to believe the planting of cotton in those areas will jeopardize the success of the program. The department may promulgate rules prohibiting the planting of noncommercial cotton in eradication zones. The department may promulgate rules requiring all growers of commercial cotton in an eradication zone to participate in a program of boll weevil eradication, including participation in cost sharing.

(2) The department is authorized to set by rule a schedule of penalty fees to be assessed when growers in designated eradication zones do not meet the requirements of the rules issued by the department with respect to reporting of acreage and participation in cost sharing as prescribed by rule. The penalty fees may not exceed a charge of $25 per acre. When a grower fails to meet the requirements of the rules adopted by the department, the department may destroy any of the grower’s cotton in the eradication zone that is not in compliance with prescribed rules.

History.—s. 9, ch. 87-55; s. 1, ch. 88-303; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 593.109 on Google Scholar

F.S. 593.109 on Casetext

Amendments to 593.109

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 593.109

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 593.109.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 593.109

Total Results: 18

Zimmerman v. CADE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-05-07

Citation: 34 So. 3d 199, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6284, 2010 WL 1816255

Snippet: Storage *202 Co. v. South Fla. Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212 (Fla.1926); 32 Fla. Jur. 2d Interpleader

Wassman v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-10-12

Citation: 797 So. 2d 626, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14459

Snippet: Cold Storage Co. v. South Fla. Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212, 218 (1926). The purpose of interpleader

Todd v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-08-22

Citation: 643 So. 2d 625, 1994 WL 447296

Snippet: religious belief is favored or preferred. Id. at 593, 109 S.Ct. at 3101, 106 L.Ed.2d at 494. As explained

Sciandra v. First Union Nat. Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-06-15

Citation: 638 So. 2d 1009, 1994 WL 264276

Snippet: Storage Co. v. South Florida Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212 (1926); 32 Fla.Jur.2d Judgments and Decrees

Miller v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-11-28

Citation: 569 So. 2d 1386, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8948, 1990 WL 181842

Snippet: shooting. Cf. Brower v. County of Inyo, 489 U.S. 593, 109 S.Ct. 1378, 103 L.Ed.2d 628 (1989); Dodd v. City

Florida Steel Corp. v. AG Spanos Enterprises, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-06-02

Citation: 332 So. 2d 663, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14444

Snippet: Company v. South Florida Farms Company, 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212 (1926). A closer question is whether a

Trak Microwave Corp. v. Medaris Management, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-05-27

Citation: 236 So. 2d 189, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6313

Snippet: Storage Co. v. South Fla. Farms, 1926, 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212, 218. In 1962 the remedy was codified

Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Barrett

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-04-27

Citation: 174 So. 2d 417, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4547

Snippet: Co. v. South Florida Farms Co., 1926, 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212, 48 A.L.R. 957. The garnishor should have

Troup v. Meyer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-12-17

Citation: 116 So. 2d 467

Snippet: Storage Co. v. South Florida Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212, 48 A.L.R. 957; Fogg v. Goode, 78 Fla

Paul v. Harold Davis, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-02-06

Citation: 20 So. 2d 795, 155 Fla. 538, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 572

Snippet: , et al., v. South Florida Farms Co., 90 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212. 48 A.L.R. 957. See also Fogg v. Goode

Kehl, Et Ux. v. Miami Title Abstract Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-05-17

Citation: 196 So. 610, 143 Fla. 9

Snippet: Storage Co. v. South Florida Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212, 49 A. L. R. 957; Lowry v. Downing Mfg

Aronson v. First Savings & Trust Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-07-11

Citation: 190 So. 524, 139 Fla. 240, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1653

Snippet: Storage Co. v. South Florida Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593,109 So. 212, 48 A. L. R. 957. The decree appealed from

New York Life Insurance v. Bancroft

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-12-12

Citation: 164 So. 515, 122 Fla. 10, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1136

Snippet: Storage Co. v. South Fla. Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593, 109 So.2d 212; Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Eno,

State Ex Rel. Security State Bank v. Barker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-05-05

Citation: 141 So. 321, 105 Fla. 432

Snippet: Co., et al. v. South Florida Farms Co.,91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212. Section 6021 (4092) C. G. L. 1927, provides

Curtis v. Albritton as Cir. Judge

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-02-11

Citation: 132 So. 677, 101 Fla. 853

Snippet: Cold Storage Co. v. South Fla. Farms Co.,91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212, 48 A. L. R. 957. The power to stay proceedings

Central Farmers' Trust Co. v. Davis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-02-10

Citation: 132 So. 695, 101 Fla. 832

Snippet: Storage Co. vs. South Florida Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212 (and cases there cited) in which case

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Eno

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-06-26

Citation: 127 So. 864, 99 Fla. 874

Snippet: , et al., v. South Florida Farms Co., 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. R. 212, and in Bank of Bay Biscayne v. Fuller

Bank of Bay Biscayne v. Fuller

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-01-09

Citation: 115 So. 530, 94 Fla. 1226

Snippet: Storage Company v. South Florida Farms, 91 Fla. 593, 109 So. 212, and we can see no good purpose to be