Florida Statute 599.002 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 599
VITICULTURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 599.002

599.002 Viticulture Advisory Council.—

(1) There is created within the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services the Viticulture Advisory Council, to consist of eight members as follows: the president of the Florida Grape Growers’ Association or a designee thereof; a representative from the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences; a representative from the viticultural science program at Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University; and five additional commercial members, to be appointed for a 2-year term each by the Commissioner of Agriculture, including a wine producer, a fresh fruit producer, a nonwine product (juice, jelly, pie fillings, etc.) producer, and a viticultural nursery operator.

(2) The meetings, powers and duties, procedures, and recordkeeping of the Viticulture Advisory Council shall be pursuant to s. 570.232.

(3) The primary responsibilities of the Viticulture Advisory Council are to submit to the Commissioner of Agriculture, annually, the industry’s recommendations for viticultural research, promotion, and education and, as necessary, the industry’s recommendations for revisions to the State Viticulture Plan.

History.—ss. 3, 6, ch. 84-295; s. 4, ch. 85-62; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 85, ch. 93-169; s. 3, ch. 94-296; s. 29, ch. 94-335; s. 59, ch. 2011-206; s. 157, ch. 2014-150; s. 33, ch. 2023-154.

F.S. 599.002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 599.002 on Casetext

Amendments to 599.002

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 599.002

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 599.002.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 599.002

Total Results: 6

Rensin v. State, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-04-03

Citation: 18 So. 3d 572

Snippet: employees of Florida Wyndham hotels. Id. at 595-96, 599;[2]see also Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So.2d 1252, 1260

State v. FG

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-08-10

Citation: 630 So. 2d 581, 1993 WL 302608

Snippet: March 16, 1993, State v. R.L., Appeal No. 93-599. [2] In State v. A.D., the court ordered a predisposition

La Grande v. B & L SERVICES, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-06-09

Citation: 432 So. 2d 1364

Snippet: Commission v. State, 1945, 155 Fla. 772, 21 So.2d 599; 2 Am. Jur., Agency § 8. * * * * * * The relationship

Florida Canners Ass'n v. State, Dept. of Citrus

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-05-16

Citation: 371 So. 2d 503, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14633

Snippet: laws were set forth in separate chapters. Section 599.02, headed "Necessity for Citrus Advertising" stated

Collins v. Federated Mutual Imp. & Hdwe. Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-04-23

Citation: 247 So. 2d 461

Snippet: Commission v. State, 1945, 155 Fla. 772, 21 So.2d 599; 2 Am. Jur., Agency § 8. Generally the test of what

Simon v. Simon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-06-23

Citation: 114 So. 2d 21, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2693

Snippet: 2d 374; Hall v. Davis, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 599; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 204. Affirmed. CARROLL, CHAS