Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 600.031 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 600.031 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 600.031

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 600
CITRUS MARKETING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 600.031
600.031 Purposes of law.The purposes of this act are:
(1) To enable citrus fruit producers of this state, with the aid and under the direction and control of the state, more effectively to correlate the production and marketing of their citrus fruit with market demands therefor.
(2) To establish and maintain orderly marketing of citrus fruit grown in Florida.
(3) To provide methods and means for the development of new and larger markets for citrus fruit grown in Florida.
(4) To eliminate or reduce economic waste in the production, handling, and marketing of citrus fruit grown in Florida.
(5) To restore and maintain adequate purchasing power for the citrus fruit producers of Florida.
(6) To conserve the agricultural wealth of the state.
History.s. 2, ch. 61-88.

F.S. 600.031 on Google Scholar

F.S. 600.031 on Casetext

Amendments to 600.031


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 600.031
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 600.031.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 600.031

Total Results: 2

Best Drywall Services, Inc. v. Blaszczyk

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-26

Citation: 207 So. 3d 271, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865

Snippet: totaled $321,600.31 and that the Blaszczyks failed to pay the final two invoices totaling $61,600.31. Best recorded

Blue v. Staten

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-08-18

Citation: 84 Fla. 274, 93 So. 686

Snippet: of Fla.; City of St. Louis v. Weitzel, 130 Mo. 600, 31 S. W. Rep. 1045; Karnuff. v. Kelch, supra. But