Florida Statute 601.36 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 601.36

601.36 Inspection information required when two or more lots of fruit run simultaneously.—In the event that any packinghouse packing citrus fruit or canning plant canning citrus fruit or concentrating plant concentrating citrus fruit shall have present therein or shall be packing, canning, or concentrating two or more lots of fruit simultaneously, the manager or other person in charge of said packinghouse or said canning plant or said concentrating plant shall notify the citrus fruit inspector conducting inspections at said packinghouse or canning plant or concentrating plant of said fact and furnish to said inspector full information as to the source of said several lots of fruit and the number of boxes in each several lots.

History.—s. 36, ch. 25149, 1949.

F.S. 601.36 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.36 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.36

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.36

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 601.36.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 601.36

Total Results: 12

Zurstrassen v. Stonier

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-05-16

Citation: 786 So. 2d 65, 2001 WL 527637

Snippet: ratifies the fraud. See Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172, 177 (1948). However, in the instant

Essex Ins. Co. v. UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-12-29

Citation: 665 So. 2d 360, 1995 WL 763341

Snippet: damage to the plaintiff. Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1948); S.H. Inv. & Dev. Corp. v

Payco-General American Credits, Inc. v. Coster

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-01-22

Citation: 573 So. 2d 192, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 374, 1991 WL 4344

Snippet: 480 So.2d 625 (Fla.1985); Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172 (1948); Telesphere Int’l, Inc. v. Scollin

Reynolds v. the Surf Club

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-07-02

Citation: 473 So. 2d 1327, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1635

Snippet: their new certificates. Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1948). Accordingly, judgment is

Dawson v. Dawson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-05-28

Citation: 164 So. 2d 536

Snippet: So. 781, 34 L.R.A. 87; Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172; Courtney v. Courtney, 108 Fla. 276,

Rodda v. Rodda

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-01-07

Citation: 159 So. 2d 259

Snippet: demonstrate error. See: Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172; Stoller v. Jaffe, Fla.*260App.1960,

McDonald v. Connell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-12-18

Citation: 158 So. 2d 780

Snippet: compensated in damages. Ball v. Ball, 1948, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172. The amended complaint did not allege

Hieber v. Hieber

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-04-09

Citation: 151 So. 2d 646

Snippet: erroneous under the evidence. Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172. After a careful examination of the record

Young v. Young

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-07-10

Citation: 97 So. 2d 470

Snippet: So. 781, 34 L.R.A. 87; Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172; Courtney v. Courtney, 108 Fla. 276,

MacNeill v. Marks

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-05-05

Citation: 64 So. 2d 922, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1256

Snippet: Fla., 45 So.2d 496, and Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172. Affirmed. ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL

Natural Gas & Appliance Co. v. Marion County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-04-29

Citation: 58 So. 2d 701, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1203

Snippet: lower court is correct. Ball v. Ball, 160 Fla. 601, 36 So.2d 172; Schroeder v. Annenberg, 148 Fla. 513

Jordan v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1905-06-15

Citation: 50 Fla. 94

Snippet: not objected to. See Alford v. State, 46 Fla. 601, 36 South. Rep. 436. The following charge given by