Florida Statute 601.93 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 601.93

601.93 Sale of citrus containing arsenic.—No person shall sell or offer for sale, transport, prepare, secure, or deliver for transportation or market any fruit of any variety except grapefruit which contains any arsenic or any compound or derivative of arsenic.

History.—s. 93, ch. 25149, 1949.

F.S. 601.93 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.93 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.93

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.93

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S601.93 - HEALTH-SAFETY - SELL DELIVER FRUIT GRAPEFRUIT CONTAIN ARSENIC - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 601.93

Total Results: 19

Siplin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-12-28

Citation: 972 So. 2d 982, 2007 WL 4546301

Snippet: 2d 816 (Fla. 1983) (citing Broadrick, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830). Here, the State obviously

Doe v. Mortham

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-03-19

Citation: 708 So. 2d 929, 1998 WL 120280

Snippet: were set out in Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973), wherein the

Shetler v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-24

Citation: 681 So. 2d 730, 1996 WL 273642

Snippet: constitutionality. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). Shetler lacks

State v. Ginn

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-30

Citation: 660 So. 2d 1118, 1995 WL 509286

Snippet: property rights. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); McGowan v. Maryland

Pallas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-05-03

Citation: 636 So. 2d 1358, 1994 WL 162755

Snippet: the Court. In Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)], we recognized

State v. Olson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-09-20

Citation: 586 So. 2d 1239, 1991 WL 187311

Snippet: unconstitutional results, Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); White v. State

State v. Tirohn

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-01-25

Citation: 556 So. 2d 447, 1990 WL 4150

Snippet: unconstitutional. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); State v. Gray

State v. Long

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-31

Citation: 544 So. 2d 219, 1989 WL 29025

Snippet: vicariously. See Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Sandstrom v

City of Daytona Beach v. Del Percio

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-08-30

Citation: 476 So. 2d 197, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 458

Snippet: overbreadth doctrine, Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). The Broadrick

State v. Stella

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-08-29

Citation: 454 So. 2d 780, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1873, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14913

Snippet: 1979), citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). It is for the

Del Percio v. City of Daytona Beach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-03-29

Citation: 449 So. 2d 323

Snippet: 2d 310 (1976); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Basiardanes

State v. Gray

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-07-21

Citation: 435 So. 2d 816

Snippet: 2d 600 (1975); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Winters v. New

Deehl v. Knox

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-05-11

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1089

Snippet: overbreadth.[6]Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Grand Faloon

Griffin v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-03-12

Citation: 396 So. 2d 152, 21 A.L.R. 4th 225

Snippet: 2d 600 (1975); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). Thus in Keaton

State v. Hamilton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-09-18

Citation: 388 So. 2d 561, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20

Snippet: 2d 605 (1974); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1974). The state argues

Carricarte v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-06-05

Citation: 384 So. 2d 1261

Snippet: Amendment rights. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). It is not necessary

Trushin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-20

Citation: 384 So. 2d 668

Snippet: frivolous." See also Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830, supra. Similarly, even

Sandstrom v. Leader

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-03-22

Citation: 370 So. 2d 3

Snippet: property rights. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); McGowan v. Maryland

Pace v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-02-01

Citation: 368 So. 2d 340

Snippet: expression principles. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). The anti-solicitation