Florida Statute 601.93 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 601.93

601.93 Sale of citrus containing arsenic.—No person shall sell or offer for sale, transport, prepare, secure, or deliver for transportation or market any fruit of any variety except grapefruit which contains any arsenic or any compound or derivative of arsenic.

History.—s. 93, ch. 25149, 1949.

F.S. 601.93 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.93 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.93

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.93

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S601.93 - HEALTH-SAFETY - SELL DELIVER FRUIT GRAPEFRUIT CONTAIN ARSENIC - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 601.93

Total Results: 19

Siplin v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-12-27T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 972 So. 2d 982

Snippet: .2d 816 (Fla. 1983) (citing Broadrick, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830). Here, the State obviously

Doe v. Mortham

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1998-03-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 708 So. 2d 929

Snippet: were set out in Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973), wherein the

Shetler v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-05-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 681 So. 2d 730

Snippet: constitutionality. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). Shetler lacks

State v. Ginn

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-08-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 660 So. 2d 1118

Snippet: property rights. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); McGowan v. Maryland

Pallas v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-05-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 636 So. 2d 1358

Snippet: the Court. In Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)], we recognized

State v. Olson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-09-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 586 So. 2d 1239

Snippet: unconstitutional results, Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); White v. State

State v. Tirohn

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-01-24T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 556 So. 2d 447

Snippet: unconstitutional. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); State v. Gray

State v. Long

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-03-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 544 So. 2d 219

Snippet: vicariously. See Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Sandstrom v.

City of Daytona Beach v. Del Percio

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1985-08-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 476 So. 2d 197

Snippet: overbreadth doctrine, Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). The Broadrick

State v. Stella

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-08-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 454 So. 2d 780, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1873, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14913

Snippet: .1979), citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). It is for the

Del Percio v. City of Daytona Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-03-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 449 So. 2d 323

Snippet: .2d 310 (1976); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Basiardanes

State v. Gray

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1983-07-21T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 435 So. 2d 816

Snippet: .2d 600 (1975); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Winters v. New

Deehl v. Knox

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-05-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1089

Snippet: overbreadth.[6]Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Grand Faloon

Griffin v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1981-03-11T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 396 So. 2d 152

Snippet: .2d 600 (1975); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). Thus in Keaton

State v. Hamilton

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1980-09-18T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 388 So. 2d 561

Snippet: .2d 605 (1974); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1974). The state argues

Carricarte v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1980-06-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 384 So. 2d 1261

Snippet: Amendment rights. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). It is not necessary

Trushin v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1980-05-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 384 So. 2d 668

Snippet: quot; See also Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830, supra. Similarly, even…214 (1971) with Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). [11] "

Sandstrom v. Leader

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1979-03-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 370 So. 2d 3

Snippet: property rights. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); McGowan v. Maryland

Pace v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1979-01-31T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 368 So. 2d 340

Snippet: expression principles. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). The anti-solicitation