Florida Statute 605.0114 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Chapter 605
FLORIDA REVISED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 605.0114

605.0114 Change of registered agent or registered office.—

(1) In order to change its registered agent or registered office address, a limited liability company or a foreign limited liability company may deliver to the department for filing a statement of change containing the following:

(a) The name of the limited liability company or foreign limited liability company.

(b) The name of its current registered agent.

(d) The street address of its current registered office for its current registered agent.

(e) If the street address of the current registered office is to be changed, the new street address of the registered office in this state.

(2) If the registered agent is changed, the written acceptance of the successor registered agent described in s. 605.0113(2) must also be included in or attached to the statement of change.

(3) A statement of change is effective when filed by the department or when authorized under s. 605.0207.

(4) The changes described in this section may also be made on the limited liability company’s or foreign limited liability company’s annual report, in an application for reinstatement filed with the department under s. 605.0715(1), in an amendment to or restatement of a company’s articles of organization in accordance with s. 605.0202, or in an amendment to a foreign limited liability company’s certificate of authority in accordance with s. 605.0907.

History.—s. 2, ch. 2013-180; s. 239, ch. 2019-90.

F.S. 605.0114 on Google Scholar

F.S. 605.0114 on Casetext

Amendments to 605.0114

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 605.0114

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 605.0114.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 605.0114

Total Results: 10

VENTURA GOMEZ v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-01-19T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: fatal. Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 605, 114 S. Ct. 1793, 1797, 128 L. Ed. 2d 608 (1994) (

Kelly Mathis v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-10-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 208 So. 3d 158

Snippet: jurisprudence.” Staples, 511 U.S. at 605, 114 S.Ct. 1793 (quoting United States v. Gypsum…conduct illegal. Staples, 511 U.S. at 605, 114 S.Ct. 1793. Accordingly, we interpret the statute

Ramroop v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-09-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 174 So. 3d 584

Snippet: citing Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 605, 114 S.Ct. 1793, 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994)). . Further

Enoch v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-07-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 95 So. 3d 344

Snippet: illegal.” Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 605, 114 S.Ct. 1793, 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994) (holding that

State v. Adkins

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-07-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 96 So. 3d 412, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 449, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1365, 2012 WL 2849485

Snippet: , 71 S.Ct. 857); see also Staples, 511 U.S. at 605, 114 S.Ct. 1793 (reciting the same). And in applying…see also Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 605, 114 S.Ct. 1793, 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994) (reciting the

State v. Washington

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-06-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 114 So. 3d 182

Snippet: required to violate the statute. Staples, 511 U.S. at 605, 114 S.Ct. 1793. In its analysis, the Staples Court

Masaka v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-04-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 4 So. 3d 1274

Snippet: particularized guarantees of trustworthiness." Id. at 605, 114 S.Ct. 2431. This requirement has two separate

State v. Giorgetti

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-03-03T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 868 So. 2d 512

Snippet: requirement. See Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 605, 114 S.Ct. 1793, 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994) ("[S]ilence

Franqui v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1997-06-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 699 So. 2d 1312

Snippet: Confrontation Clause. Williamson, 512 U.S. at 605, 114 S.Ct. at 2437-38 (plurality opinion of O'Connor

Chicone v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1996-10-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 684 So. 2d 736

Snippet: of legislative intent. Staples, 511 U.S. at 603-605, 114 S.Ct. at 1796-97; Morissette v. United States,