Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 610.113 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 610.113 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 610.113

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter 610
CABLE AND VIDEO SERVICES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 610.113
610.113 Nondiscrimination by municipality or county.—
(1) A municipality or county shall allow a certificateholder to install, construct, and maintain a network within a public right-of-way and shall provide a certificateholder with comparable, nondiscriminatory, and competitively neutral access to the public right-of-way in accordance with the provisions of s. 337.401. All use of a public right-of-way by a certificateholder is nonexclusive.
(2) A municipality or county may not discriminate against a certificateholder regarding:
(a) The authorization or placement of a network in a public right-of-way;
(b) Access to a building or other property; or
(c) Utility pole attachment terms and conditions.
History.—s. 7, ch. 2007-29.

F.S. 610.113 on Google Scholar

F.S. 610.113 on Casetext

Amendments to 610.113


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 610.113
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 610.113.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 610.113

Total Results: 3

City of Hollywood v. Hogan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-06-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 986 So. 2d 634

Snippet: quot; Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604, 610, 113 S.Ct. 1701, 123 L.Ed.2d 338 (1993). That is, the…quoting Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604, 610, 113 S.Ct. 1701, 123 L.Ed.2d 338 (1993)). This may

DEPT. OF ENVIR. PROTECTION v. Zabielinski

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-09-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 785 So. 2d 517

Snippet: (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(citing Austin, 509 U.S. at 610, 113 S.Ct. 2801); see also, United States v. Bajakajian

Town of Jupiter v. Garcia

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-08-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 698 So. 2d 871, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9204, 1997 WL 461193

Snippet: Amendment excessive fines analysis. 509 U.S. at 610,113 S.Ct. at 2805-06.1 The Austin analysis has been