Florida Statute 627.733 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 627
INSURANCE RATES AND CONTRACTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 627.733

627.733 Required security.—

(1)(a) Every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle, other than a motor vehicle used as a school bus as defined in s. 1006.25 or limousine, required to be registered and licensed in this state shall maintain security as required by subsection (3) in effect continuously throughout the registration or licensing period.

(b) Every owner or registrant of a motor vehicle used as a taxicab shall not be governed by paragraph (1)(a) but shall maintain security as required under s. 324.032(1), and s. 627.737 shall not apply to any motor vehicle used as a taxicab.

(2) Every nonresident owner or registrant of a motor vehicle which, whether operated or not, has been physically present within this state for more than 90 days during the preceding 365 days shall thereafter maintain security as defined by subsection (3) in effect continuously throughout the period such motor vehicle remains within this state.

(3) Such security shall be provided:

(a) By an insurance policy delivered or issued for delivery in this state by an authorized or eligible motor vehicle liability insurer which provides the benefits and exemptions contained in ss. 627.730-627.7405. Any policy of insurance represented or sold as providing the security required hereunder shall be deemed to provide insurance for the payment of the required benefits; or

(b) By any other method authorized by s. 324.031(2) or (3) and approved by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles as affording security equivalent to that afforded by a policy of insurance or by self-insuring as authorized by s. 768.28(16). The person filing such security shall have all of the obligations and rights of an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405.

(4) An owner of a motor vehicle with respect to which security is required by this section who fails to have such security in effect at the time of an accident shall have no immunity from tort liability, but shall be personally liable for the payment of benefits under s. 627.736. With respect to such benefits, such an owner shall have all of the rights and obligations of an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405.

(5) In addition to other persons who are not required to provide required security as required under this section and s. 324.022, the owner or registrant of a motor vehicle is exempt from such requirements if she or he is a member of the United States Armed Forces and is called to or on active duty outside the United States in an emergency situation. The exemption provided by this subsection applies only as long as the member of the armed forces is on such active duty outside the United States and applies only while the vehicle covered by the security required by this section and s. 324.022 is not operated by any person. Upon receipt of a written request by the insured to whom the exemption provided in this subsection applies, the insurer shall cancel the coverages and return any unearned premium or suspend the security required by this section and s. 324.022. Notwithstanding s. 324.0221(2), the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles may not suspend the registration or operator’s license of any owner or registrant of a motor vehicle during the time she or he qualifies for an exemption under this subsection. Any owner or registrant of a motor vehicle who qualifies for an exemption under this subsection shall immediately notify the department prior to and at the end of the expiration of the exemption.

History.—ss. 4, 6, ch. 71-252; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 8, ch. 77-118; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 31, 32, ch. 77-468; s. 11, ch. 78-374; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 552, 563, ch. 82-243; s. 69, ch. 82-386; ss. 4, 6, ch. 86-182; s. 18, ch. 88-370; s. 57, ch. 89-282; s. 5, ch. 91-106; s. 4, ch. 91-110; s. 1, ch. 91-128; s. 77, ch. 93-120; s. 7, ch. 95-202; s. 30, ch. 95-211; s. 2, ch. 97-84; s. 362, ch. 97-102; s. 14, ch. 98-223; s. 34, ch. 99-3; ss. 63, 317, ch. 99-248; s. 1031, ch. 2002-387; s. 19, ch. 2003-2; s. 19, ch. 2003-411; s. 123, ch. 2004-5; s. 47, ch. 2006-290; s. 4, ch. 2007-150; s. 11, ch. 2007-324; s. 90, ch. 2013-160.

Note.—Consolidation of s. 627.733 and former s. 627.735.

F.S. 627.733 on Google Scholar

F.S. 627.733 on CourtListener

Amendments to 627.733

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 627.733

Total Results: 73

Kluger v. White

281 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1973 | Docket: 1262129

Cited 158 times | Published

loss as is, in effect, required by Fla. Stat. § 627.733, F.S.A., with respect to other possible damages

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols

932 So. 2d 1067, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 358, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 982, 2006 WL 1491542

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2006 | Docket: 1072860

Cited 117 times | Published

is accomplished through the provisions of section 627.733, which require that every owner of a motor

Lasky v. State Farm Insurance Company

296 So. 2d 9

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1974 | Docket: 2556516

Cited 113 times | Published

loss as is, in effect, required by Fla. Stat. § 627.733, F.S.A., with respect to other possible damages

Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.

35 So. 3d 873, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 222, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 581, 2010 WL 1609785

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2010 | Docket: 2515595

Cited 79 times | Published

alternative means, one of which is PIP insurance. See § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (2006). The "Required Personal Injury

Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co.

753 So. 2d 80, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 120, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 86, 2000 WL 144188

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2000 | Docket: 592622

Cited 63 times | Published

section 768.28(15)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). See § 627.733(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995). Owners of private passenger

Reid v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

352 So. 2d 1172

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1977 | Docket: 1694081

Cited 50 times | Published

Specifically, she relies upon the language of Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1975). One of the express

Ramos v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co.

336 So. 2d 71

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1976 | Docket: 2504523

Cited 36 times | Published

of requiring that motorists carry insurance [§ 627.733, Fla. Stat.; 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lee

678 So. 2d 818, 1996 WL 473318

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1996 | Docket: 2517431

Cited 32 times | Published

complying with the security requirements of section 627.733, Florida Statutes. With regard to the payment

State v. Bradford

787 So. 2d 811, 2001 WL 578468

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2001 | Docket: 1745001

Cited 26 times | Published

161 (1999)). [9] See supra note 5. [10] See § 627.733, Fla.Stat. (2000).

Erie Ins. Co. v. Bushy

394 So. 2d 228

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1981 | Docket: 1315084

Cited 23 times | Published

was a self-insurer under Florida Statutes, section 627.733(1). Holding an owner of an uninsured motor

Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of Garcia v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc.

510 F. Supp. 2d 821, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15335, 2007 WL 686625

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2007 | Docket: 1808737

Cited 22 times | Published

liability for any one crash), and Fla. Stat. § 627.733 (setting forth Florida's Motor Vehicle No-Fault

Nichols v. State Farm Mut.

851 So. 2d 742, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8794, 2003 WL 21359343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2003 | Docket: 1691422

Cited 21 times | Published

is accomplished through the provisions of section 627.733, which require that every owner of a motor

Industrial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Kwechin

447 So. 2d 1337, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3114

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1983 | Docket: 1311775

Cited 16 times | Published

of financial responsibility as required by section 627.733(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1977).[1] Indisputably

FLA. DHSMV v. Critchfield

842 So. 2d 782

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2003 | Docket: 1730513

Cited 15 times | Published

permanently revoked. Finally, section 14 amends section 627.733, Florida Statutes which deals with suspension

Ward v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

364 So. 2d 73

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1978 | Docket: 2514460

Cited 13 times | Published

reason of the following language found in Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1977): An owner of a motor

Main Ins. Co. v. Wiggins

349 So. 2d 638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1977 | Docket: 1655143

Cited 12 times | Published

to carry insurance on the leased vehicle. See § 627.733, Florida Statutes (1975). Appellee did not own

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc.

961 So. 2d 328, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 453, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1228, 2007 WL 2002542

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2007 | Docket: 1515751

Cited 11 times | Published

alternative means, one of which is PIP insurance. See § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (2006). The "Required Personal Injury

Lipof v. Florida Power and Light Co.

596 So. 2d 1005, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 117, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 243, 1992 WL 27891

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1992 | Docket: 1707232

Cited 10 times | Published

with the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law. Section 627.733(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), states that

Dixie Farms, Inc. v. Hertz Corp.

343 So. 2d 633, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1977 | Docket: 1304223

Cited 10 times | Published

coverage. We believe that in accordance with Section 627.733(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), a self-insurer

Tapscott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

330 So. 2d 475, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1976 | Docket: 1797942

Cited 10 times | Published

correspondingly excused from the security requirements of § 627.733(1), when the owner no longer "maintains" the vehicle

DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES v. Critchfield

805 So. 2d 1034, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17, 2002 WL 10071

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2002 | Docket: 1669470

Cited 9 times | Published

permanently revoked. Finally, section 14 amends section 627.733, Florida Statutes which deals with suspension

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Palma

524 So. 2d 1035, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 742, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1102, 1988 WL 23401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1988 | Docket: 1340969

Cited 9 times | Published

personal injury protection benefits provided by section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1983). Palma sued State

Griffin v. Travelers Indemnity Company

328 So. 2d 207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1976 | Docket: 1334882

Cited 9 times | Published

policy complying with the security requirements of § 627.733 shall provide personal injury protection providing

Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co.

789 So. 2d 464, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9027, 2001 WL 726002

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2001 | Docket: 43842

Cited 8 times | Published

required to register their car in Florida. See § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (1993). A person must register a car

Hepler v. Atlas Mut. Ins. Co.

501 So. 2d 681, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1987 | Docket: 537974

Cited 8 times | Published

Hepler's vehicle registration and operator's permit. § 627.733(5), Fla. Stat. (1983). The penalties for failure

Staley v. Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co.

328 So. 2d 241, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1976 | Docket: 1699521

Cited 8 times | Published

the Florida Automobile Reparations Reform Act, § 627.733 et seq., F.S. 1973. While riding as a passenger

Farley v. Gateway Insurance Company

302 So. 2d 177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1974 | Docket: 1742496

Cited 8 times | Published

Farley's stepfather did not have coverage, so § 627.733(4), F.S. 1971, is relevant; and that, as applied

Levy v. Travelers Ins. Co.

580 So. 2d 190, 1991 WL 50104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1991 | Docket: 1716897

Cited 7 times | Published

complying with the security requirements of section 627.733, Florida Statutes. With regard to the payment

Sherman v. Reserve Ins. Co.

350 So. 2d 349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1977 | Docket: 1715721

Cited 7 times | Published

627.730, et seq., Florida Statutes (1971). Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1971), provides that every

Reeves v. Miller

418 So. 2d 1050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1982 | Docket: 1289071

Cited 6 times | Published

concur. NOTES [1] See ch. 324, Fla. Stat. (1975); § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (1975) (effective January 1, 1972)

Reid v. Allstate Ins. Co.

344 So. 2d 877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1977 | Docket: 474656

Cited 6 times | Published

Specifically, she relies upon the language of Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1975). One of the express

Benton v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

295 So. 2d 344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1974 | Docket: 1762236

Cited 6 times | Published

policy complying with the security requirements of § 627.733 shall provide personal injury protection providing

Delta Cas. Co. v. Pinnacle Medical, Inc.

721 So. 2d 321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1998 | Docket: 1323285

Cited 5 times | Published

registered in Florida must buy PIP insurance. § 627.733, Fla. Stat. Under the statutory PIP scheme, the

Epperson v. Dixie Ins. Co.

461 So. 2d 172

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1984 | Docket: 1514598

Cited 5 times | Published

sufficient to provide the security specified in section 627.733. All insurance policies issued for vehicles

Scherzer v. Beron

455 So. 2d 441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1984 | Docket: 1692641

Cited 5 times | Published

entered a judgment in the defendant's favor. Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1981), requires only the

Ward v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins.

375 So. 2d 898

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1979 | Docket: 1352956

Cited 5 times | Published

inoperable", said the court, "has no effect on Section 627.733(1), Florida Statutes, or on the requirement

Dealers Ins. Co. v. Jon Hall Chevrolet Co.

547 So. 2d 325, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1892, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4529, 1989 WL 88834

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1989 | Docket: 1474784

Cited 4 times | Published

obtain PIP insurance on all of its vehicles. § 627.733, Fla. Stat. (1985). Payment of these premiums

Farmer v. Protective Cas. Ins. Co.

530 So. 2d 356, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1791, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3450, 1988 WL 77943

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1988 | Docket: 1267688

Cited 4 times | Published

policy complying with the security requirements of § 627.733 shall provide personal injury protection to .

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Wolfson

348 So. 2d 661, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1977 | Docket: 1761104

Cited 4 times | Published

policy complying with the security requirements of § 627.733 shall provide personal injury protection providing

Williams v. Leatherby Ins. Co.

338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1976 | Docket: 2564430

Cited 4 times | Published

pivotal question is whether, under these facts, Section 627.733, Florida Statutes, requires security for a

Central Magnetic Imaging Open MRI of Plantation, Ltd. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

789 F. Supp. 2d 1311, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63698, 2011 WL 2247821

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2011 | Docket: 1992045

Cited 3 times | Published

PIP insurance. Id. (citing quoting FLA. STAT. § 627.733). Florida Statute section 627.736 contains the

ST. FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. v. Howard

458 So. 2d 874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1984 | Docket: 2579924

Cited 3 times | Published

verdict, ruling that the tort exemption of section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1981), did not apply in

Andriakos v. Cavanaugh

350 So. 2d 561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1977 | Docket: 1715724

Cited 3 times | Published

without consideration of his accident record. Section 627.733(3)(a) of the Automobile Reparations Reform

Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Carbon

327 So. 2d 792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1976 | Docket: 1716287

Cited 3 times | Published

personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under § 627.733(4), Fla. Stat. By answer, Greyhound raised the

Johnson v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.

297 So. 2d 858, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1974 | Docket: 1510423

Cited 3 times | Published

the requirements of § 627.733, or by an owner personally liable under § 627.733 for the payment of such

GEICO Indemnity Co. v. Gables Insurance Recovery, Inc.

159 So. 3d 151, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20022, 2014 WL 6911333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2014 | Docket: 60294046

Cited 2 times | Published

insurance policy issued in compliance with section 627.733, Florida Statutes (2008), “shall provide personal

Jiminez v. Faccone

98 So. 3d 621, 2012 WL 3238282, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2012 | Docket: 60312491

Cited 2 times | Published

exercise the permanent injury threshold defense. Section 627.733(1) provides that every vehicle required to

Leinhart v. Jurkovich

882 So. 2d 456, 2004 WL 1933560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2004 | Docket: 1686421

Cited 2 times | Published

required of out-of-state motor vehicles. See § 627.733(2), Fla. Stat. (1994). Therefore, Florida has

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS. CO. v. Johnson

536 So. 2d 1089, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2500, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5021, 1988 WL 120929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1988 | Docket: 1760018

Cited 2 times | Published

failure to have his truck insured as required by section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1985) barred his claim for

Quanstrom v. Standard Guar. Ins. Co.

504 So. 2d 1295, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1987 | Docket: 453507

Cited 2 times | Published

627.730 through 637.7405, Florida Statutes. Section 627.733(1), Florida Statutes (1985) requires security

Fortune Ins. Co. v. Oehme

453 So. 2d 920, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1757, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1984 | Docket: 1162809

Cited 2 times | Published

be registered and licensed in this state... ." § 627.733(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). Section 320.02(1), Florida

Benton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

295 So. 2d 344, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7092

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1974 | Docket: 64539348

Cited 2 times | Published

policy complying with the security requirements of § 627.733 shall provide personal injury protection providing

Holt v. King

707 So. 2d 1141, 1998 WL 63962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 1676004

Cited 1 times | Published

This appeal followed. *1143 Florida Statutes section 627.733, entitled Required Security, requires all motor

INTERNATIONAL BANKERS INS. CO. v. Arnone

528 So. 2d 917, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1988, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2247, 1988 WL 53026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1988 | Docket: 1366652

Cited 1 times | Published

complying with the security requirements of section 627.733 shall provide personal injury protection to

Commercial Union Insurance Company v. WILLIAMS EX REL. KRAUSS

309 So. 2d 617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1975 | Docket: 1770722

Cited 1 times | Published

by insurance as required by Florida Statutes § 627.733. The plaintiff Vera May Williams, while a passenger

Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Florida Hospital Ocala, Inc. D/B/A Adventhealth Ocala A/A/O Sandra Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2024 | Docket: 69257779

Published

licensed in this state [to] maintain security,” § 627.733(1), Fla. Stat. (2019), “[b]y an insurance policy

SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2019 | Docket: 15672867

Published

to maintain no-fault insurance coverage. See § 627.733(1)(a) (requiring "[e]very owner or registrant

Classy Cycles, Inc. v. Bay County

201 So. 3d 779, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 60257072

Published

protection as required by section 627,733, Florida Statutes (2014). Section 627.733 in turn references sections

Geico v. Gables Insurance

159 So. 3d 151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2014 | Docket: 2613276

Published

insurance policy issued in compliance with section 627.733, Florida Statutes (2008), “shall provide personal

Utvich v. Felizola

742 So. 2d 847, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12540, 1999 WL 743506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1999 | Docket: 64791507

Published

defini-tionally excluded from the no fault law. See § 627.733(1), Fla. Stat. (1995)(“Every owner or registrant

Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Castellano

737 So. 2d 574, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8346, 1999 WL 415188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1999 | Docket: 64789441

Published

of security complying with the requirements of § 627.733.... § 627.737(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). .This section

Giarrusso v. Amiga Mutual Insurance

564 So. 2d 160, 1990 WL 82544

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1990 | Docket: 64651614

Published

two types of medical benefits: pursuant to section 627.-733, Florida Statutes (1985), the primary and

Pearson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

560 So. 2d 416, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3026, 1990 WL 57820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1990 | Docket: 64650176

Published

Pearson’s injuries. Allstate contends that section 627.733(1), Florida Statutes (1987), requires Pearson

Spence v. Hughes

485 So. 2d 903, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 796, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1986 | Docket: 64618303

Published

730-627.7405, has been provided. Specifically, section 627.733 sets forth the type or kind of security required

Williams v. Utah Home Fire Insurance Co.

481 So. 2d 547, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 155, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1986 | Docket: 64616640

Published

applicable statutory, provisions,1 as follows: Section 627.733(4), Florida Statutes (1979), provided: An owner

Snider v. Wanamaker

466 So. 2d 372, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 674, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1985 | Docket: 64610943

Published

maintain Florida no-fault insurance under section 627.733(2). Thus, appellant contends that the no-fault

Julian v. Johnson

438 So. 2d 503, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1983 | Docket: 64599838

Published

Padron, 310 So.2d 432 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Section 627.733(2), Florida Statutes (1981), requires that

Lewis v. Allstate Insurance

425 So. 2d 100, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1982 | Docket: 64594635

Published

irrespective of the contract’s actual terms. See § 627.733(3)(a), Florida Statutes; State Farm Mutual Automobile

Goin ex rel. Goin v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

423 So. 2d 556, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1982 | Docket: 64593984

Published

owners are required to have no-fault insurance. § 627.733, Florida Statutes (1981). This argument is based

Lippincott v. Exotica Imports, Inc.

413 So. 2d 66, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19533

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1982 | Docket: 64589568

Published

as required under section 627.733. When Peck purchased his automobile, section 627.733 required PIP benefits

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Pierce

383 So. 2d 1184, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1980 | Docket: 64576291

Published

without merit. As stated in Farley, supra, section 627.733(4) does not make the uninsured owner an insurer

Denmark v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

384 So. 2d 912, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1980 | Docket: 64576687

Published

need not maintain security as required by Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1977). See Sherman v. Reserve

Kenilworth Insurance v. Pizarro

369 So. 2d 995, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14828

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1979 | Docket: 64569707

Published

information Pizarro claimed the applicability of Section 627.-733(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1973), and demanded