Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 627.736 (2025)

Required personal injury protection benefits; exclusions; priority; claims.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

627.736 Required personal injury protection benefits; exclusions; priority; claims.—

(1) REQUIRED BENEFITS.—An insurance policy complying with the security requirements of s. 627.733 must provide personal injury protection to the named insured, relatives residing in the same household unless excluded under s. 627.747, persons operating the insured motor vehicle, passengers in the motor vehicle, and other persons struck by the motor vehicle and suffering bodily injury while not an occupant of a self-propelled vehicle, subject to subsection (2) and paragraph (4)(e), to a limit of $10,000 in medical and disability benefits and $5,000 in death benefits resulting from bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle as follows:

(a) Medical benefits.—Eighty percent of all reasonable expenses for medically necessary medical, surgical, X-ray, dental, and rehabilitative services, including prosthetic devices and medically necessary ambulance, hospital, and nursing services if the individual receives initial services and care pursuant to subparagraph 1. within 14 days after the motor vehicle accident. The medical benefits provide reimbursement only for:

1. Initial services and care that are lawfully provided, supervised, ordered, or prescribed by a physician licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459, a dentist licensed under chapter 466, a chiropractic physician licensed under chapter 460, or an advanced practice registered nurse registered under s. 464.0123 or that are provided in a hospital or in a facility that owns, or is wholly owned by, a hospital. Initial services and care may also be provided by a person or entity licensed under part III of chapter 401 which provides emergency transportation and treatment.

2. Upon referral by a provider described in subparagraph 1., followup services and care consistent with the underlying medical diagnosis rendered pursuant to subparagraph 1. which may be provided, supervised, ordered, or prescribed only by a physician licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459, a chiropractic physician licensed under chapter 460, a dentist licensed under chapter 466, or an advanced practice registered nurse registered under s. 464.0123, or, to the extent permitted by applicable law and under the supervision of such physician, osteopathic physician, chiropractic physician, or dentist, by a physician assistant licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459 or an advanced practice registered nurse licensed under chapter 464. Followup services and care may also be provided by the following persons or entities:

a. A hospital or ambulatory surgical center licensed under chapter 395.

b. An entity wholly owned by one or more physicians licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459, chiropractic physicians licensed under chapter 460, advanced practice registered nurses registered under s. 464.0123, or dentists licensed under chapter 466 or by such practitioners and the spouse, parent, child, or sibling of such practitioners.

c. An entity that owns or is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by a hospital or hospitals.

d. A physical therapist licensed under chapter 486, based upon a referral by a provider described in this subparagraph.

e. A health care clinic licensed under part X of chapter 400 which is accredited by an accrediting organization whose standards incorporate comparable regulations required by this state, or

(I) Has a medical director licensed under chapter 458, chapter 459, or chapter 460;

(II) Has been continuously licensed for more than 3 years or is a publicly traded corporation that issues securities traded on an exchange registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as a national securities exchange; and

(III) Provides at least four of the following medical specialties:

(A) General medicine.

(B) Radiography.

(D) Physical medicine.

(E) Physical therapy.

(F) Physical rehabilitation.

(G) Prescribing or dispensing outpatient prescription medication.

(H) Laboratory services.

3. Reimbursement for services and care provided in subparagraph 1. or subparagraph 2. up to $10,000 if a physician licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459, a dentist licensed under chapter 466, a physician assistant licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459, or an advanced practice registered nurse licensed under chapter 464 has determined that the injured person had an emergency medical condition.

4. Reimbursement for services and care provided in subparagraph 1. or subparagraph 2. is limited to $2,500 if a provider listed in subparagraph 1. or subparagraph 2. determines that the injured person did not have an emergency medical condition.

5. Medical benefits do not include massage therapy as defined in s. 480.033 or acupuncture as defined in s. 457.102, regardless of the person, entity, or licensee providing massage therapy or acupuncture, and a licensed massage therapist or licensed acupuncturist may not be reimbursed for medical benefits under this section.

6. The Financial Services Commission shall adopt by rule the form that must be used by an insurer and a health care provider specified in sub-subparagraph 2.b., sub-subparagraph 2.c., or sub-subparagraph 2.e. to document that the health care provider meets the criteria of this paragraph. Such rule must include a requirement for a sworn statement or affidavit.

(b) Disability benefits.—Sixty percent of any loss of gross income and loss of earning capacity per individual from inability to work proximately caused by the injury sustained by the injured person, plus all expenses reasonably incurred in obtaining from others ordinary and necessary services in lieu of those that, but for the injury, the injured person would have performed without income for the benefit of his or her household. All disability benefits payable under this provision must be paid at least every 2 weeks.

(c) Death benefits.—Death benefits of $5,000 per individual. Death benefits are in addition to the medical and disability benefits provided under the insurance policy. The insurer may pay death benefits to the executor or administrator of the deceased, to any of the deceased’s relatives by blood, legal adoption, or marriage, or to any person appearing to the insurer to be equitably entitled to such benefits.

Only insurers writing motor vehicle liability insurance in this state may provide the required benefits of this section, and such insurer may not require the purchase of any other motor vehicle coverage other than the purchase of property damage liability coverage as required by s. 627.7275 as a condition for providing such benefits. Insurers may not require that property damage liability insurance in an amount greater than $10,000 be purchased in conjunction with personal injury protection. Such insurers shall make benefits and required property damage liability insurance coverage available through normal marketing channels. An insurer writing motor vehicle liability insurance in this state who fails to comply with such availability requirement as a general business practice violates part IX of chapter 626, and such violation constitutes an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice involving the business of insurance. An insurer committing such violation is subject to the penalties provided under that part, as well as those provided elsewhere in the insurance code.

(2) AUTHORIZED EXCLUSIONS.—Any insurer may exclude benefits:

(a) For injury sustained by the named insured and relatives residing in the same household while occupying another motor vehicle owned by the named insured and not insured under the policy or for injury sustained by any person operating the insured motor vehicle without the express or implied consent of the insured.

(b) To any injured person, if such person’s conduct contributed to his or her injury under any of the following circumstances:

1. Causing injury to himself or herself intentionally; or

2. Being injured while committing a felony.

Whenever an insured is charged with conduct as set forth in subparagraph 2., the 30-day payment provision of paragraph (4)(b) shall be held in abeyance, and the insurer shall withhold payment of any personal injury protection benefits pending the outcome of the case at the trial level. If the charge is nolle prossed or dismissed or the insured is acquitted, the 30-day payment provision shall run from the date the insurer is notified of such action.

(3) INSURED’S RIGHTS TO RECOVERY OF SPECIAL DAMAGES IN TORT CLAIMS.—No insurer shall have a lien on any recovery in tort by judgment, settlement, or otherwise for personal injury protection benefits, whether suit has been filed or settlement has been reached without suit. An injured party who is entitled to bring suit under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405, or his or her legal representative, shall have no right to recover any damages for which personal injury protection benefits are paid or payable. The plaintiff may prove all of his or her special damages notwithstanding this limitation, but if special damages are introduced in evidence, the trier of facts, whether judge or jury, shall not award damages for personal injury protection benefits paid or payable. In all cases in which a jury is required to fix damages, the court shall instruct the jury that the plaintiff shall not recover such special damages for personal injury protection benefits paid or payable.

(4) PAYMENT OF BENEFITS.—Benefits due from an insurer under ss. 627.730-627.7405 are primary, except that benefits received under any workers’ compensation law must be credited against the benefits provided by subsection (1) and are due and payable as loss accrues upon receipt of reasonable proof of such loss and the amount of expenses and loss incurred which are covered by the policy issued under ss. 627.730-627.7405. If the Agency for Health Care Administration provides, pays, or becomes liable for medical assistance under the Medicaid program related to injury, sickness, disease, or death arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle, the benefits under ss. 627.730-627.7405 are subject to the Medicaid program. However, within 30 days after receiving notice that the Medicaid program paid such benefits, the insurer shall repay the full amount of the benefits to the Medicaid program.

(a) An insurer may require written notice to be given as soon as practicable after an accident involving a motor vehicle with respect to which the policy affords the security required by ss. 627.730-627.7405.

(b) Personal injury protection insurance benefits paid pursuant to this section are overdue if not paid within 30 days after the insurer is furnished written notice of the fact of a covered loss and of the amount of same. However:

1. If written notice of the entire claim is not furnished to the insurer, any partial amount supported by written notice is overdue if not paid within 30 days after written notice is furnished to the insurer. Any part or all of the remainder of the claim that is subsequently supported by written notice is overdue if not paid within 30 days after written notice is furnished to the insurer.

2. If an insurer pays only a portion of a claim or rejects a claim, the insurer shall provide at the time of the partial payment or rejection an itemized specification of each item that the insurer had reduced, omitted, or declined to pay and any information that the insurer desires the claimant to consider related to the medical necessity of the denied treatment or to explain the reasonableness of the reduced charge if this does not limit the introduction of evidence at trial. The insurer must also include the name and address of the person to whom the claimant should respond and a claim number to be referenced in future correspondence.

3. If an insurer pays only a portion of a claim or rejects a claim due to an alleged error in the claim, the insurer, at the time of the partial payment or rejection, shall provide an itemized specification or explanation of benefits due to the specified error. Upon receiving the specification or explanation, the person making the claim, at the person’s option and without waiving any other legal remedy for payment, has 15 days to submit a revised claim, which shall be considered a timely submission of written notice of a claim.

4. Notwithstanding the fact that written notice has been furnished to the insurer, payment is not overdue if the insurer has reasonable proof that the insurer is not responsible for the payment.

5. For the purpose of calculating the extent to which benefits are overdue, payment shall be treated as being made on the date a draft or other valid instrument that is equivalent to payment was placed in the United States mail in a properly addressed, postpaid envelope or, if not so posted, on the date of delivery.

6. This paragraph does not preclude or limit the ability of the insurer to assert that the claim was unrelated, was not medically necessary, or was unreasonable or that the amount of the charge was in excess of that permitted under, or in violation of, subsection (5). Such assertion may be made at any time, including after payment of the claim or after the 30-day period for payment set forth in this paragraph.

(c) Upon receiving notice of an accident that is potentially covered by personal injury protection benefits, the insurer must reserve $5,000 of personal injury protection benefits for payment to physicians licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459 or dentists licensed under chapter 466 who provide emergency services and care, as defined in s. 395.002, or who provide hospital inpatient care. The amount required to be held in reserve may be used only to pay claims from such physicians or dentists until 30 days after the date the insurer receives notice of the accident. After the 30-day period, any amount of the reserve for which the insurer has not received notice of such claims may be used by the insurer to pay other claims. The time periods specified in paragraph (b) for payment of personal injury protection benefits are tolled for the period of time that an insurer is required to hold payment of a claim that is not from such physician or dentist to the extent that the personal injury protection benefits not held in reserve are insufficient to pay the claim. This paragraph does not require an insurer to establish a claim reserve for insurance accounting purposes.

(d) All overdue payments bear simple interest at the rate established under s. 55.03 or the rate established in the insurance contract, whichever is greater, for the quarter in which the payment became overdue, calculated from the date the insurer was furnished with written notice of the amount of covered loss. Interest is due at the time payment of the overdue claim is made.

(e) The insurer of the owner of a motor vehicle shall pay personal injury protection benefits for:

1. Accidental bodily injury sustained in this state by the owner while occupying a motor vehicle, or while not an occupant of a self-propelled vehicle if the injury is caused by physical contact with a motor vehicle.

2. Accidental bodily injury sustained outside this state, but within the United States of America or its territories or possessions or Canada, by the owner while occupying the owner’s motor vehicle.

3. Accidental bodily injury sustained by a relative of the owner residing in the same household, under the circumstances described in subparagraph 1. or subparagraph 2., if the relative at the time of the accident is domiciled in the owner’s household and is not the owner of a motor vehicle with respect to which security is required under ss. 627.730-627.7405.

4. Accidental bodily injury sustained in this state by any other person while occupying the owner’s motor vehicle or, if a resident of this state, while not an occupant of a self-propelled vehicle if the injury is caused by physical contact with such motor vehicle, if the injured person is not:

a. The owner of a motor vehicle with respect to which security is required under ss. 627.730-627.7405; or

b. Entitled to personal injury benefits from the insurer of the owner of such a motor vehicle.

(f) If two or more insurers are liable for paying personal injury protection benefits for the same injury to any one person, the maximum payable is as specified in subsection (1), and the insurer paying the benefits is entitled to recover from each of the other insurers an equitable pro rata share of the benefits paid and expenses incurred in processing the claim.

(g) It is a violation of the insurance code for an insurer to fail to timely provide benefits as required by this section with such frequency as to constitute a general business practice.

(h) Benefits are not due or payable to or on the behalf of an insured person if that person has committed, by a material act or omission, insurance fraud relating to personal injury protection coverage under his or her policy, if the fraud is admitted to in a sworn statement by the insured or established in a court of competent jurisdiction. Any insurance fraud voids all coverage arising from the claim related to such fraud under the personal injury protection coverage of the insured person who committed the fraud, irrespective of whether a portion of the insured person’s claim may be legitimate, and any benefits paid before the discovery of the fraud is recoverable by the insurer in its entirety from the person who committed insurance fraud. The prevailing party is entitled to its costs and attorney fees in any action in which it prevails in an insurer’s action to enforce its right of recovery under this paragraph.

(i) If an insurer has a reasonable belief that a fraudulent insurance act, for the purposes of s. 626.989 or s. 817.234, has been committed, the insurer shall notify the claimant, in writing, within 30 days after submission of the claim that the claim is being investigated for suspected fraud. Beginning at the end of the initial 30-day period, the insurer has an additional 60 days to conduct its fraud investigation. Notwithstanding subsection (10), no later than 90 days after the submission of the claim, the insurer must deny the claim or pay the claim with simple interest as provided in paragraph (d). Interest shall be assessed from the day the claim was submitted until the day the claim is paid. All claims denied for suspected fraudulent insurance acts shall be reported to the Division of Criminal Investigations.

(j) An insurer shall create and maintain for each insured a log of personal injury protection benefits paid by the insurer on behalf of the insured. If litigation is commenced, the insurer shall provide to the insured a copy of the log within 30 days after receiving a request for the log from the insured.

(5) CHARGES FOR TREATMENT OF INJURED PERSONS.—

(a) A physician, hospital, clinic, or other person or institution lawfully rendering treatment to an injured person for a bodily injury covered by personal injury protection insurance may charge the insurer and injured party only a reasonable amount pursuant to this section for the services and supplies rendered, and the insurer providing such coverage may pay for such charges directly to such person or institution lawfully rendering such treatment if the insured receiving such treatment or his or her guardian has countersigned the properly completed invoice, bill, or claim form approved by the office upon which such charges are to be paid for as having actually been rendered, to the best knowledge of the insured or his or her guardian. However, such a charge may not exceed the amount the person or institution customarily charges for like services or supplies. In determining whether a charge for a particular service, treatment, or otherwise is reasonable, consideration may be given to evidence of usual and customary charges and payments accepted by the provider involved in the dispute, reimbursement levels in the community and various federal and state medical fee schedules applicable to motor vehicle and other insurance coverages, and other information relevant to the reasonableness of the reimbursement for the service, treatment, or supply.

1. The insurer may limit reimbursement to 80 percent of the following schedule of maximum charges:

a. For emergency transport and treatment by providers licensed under chapter 401, 200 percent of Medicare.

b. For emergency services and care provided by a hospital licensed under chapter 395, 75 percent of the hospital’s usual and customary charges.

c. For emergency services and care as defined by s. 395.002 provided in a facility licensed under chapter 395 rendered by a physician or dentist, and related hospital inpatient services rendered by a physician or dentist, the usual and customary charges in the community.

d. For hospital inpatient services, other than emergency services and care, 200 percent of the Medicare Part A prospective payment applicable to the specific hospital providing the inpatient services.

e. For hospital outpatient services, other than emergency services and care, 200 percent of the Medicare Part A Ambulatory Payment Classification for the specific hospital providing the outpatient services.

f. For all other medical services, supplies, and care, 200 percent of the allowable amount under:

(I) The participating physicians fee schedule of Medicare Part B, except as provided in sub-sub-subparagraphs (II) and (III).

(II) Medicare Part B, in the case of services, supplies, and care provided by ambulatory surgical centers and clinical laboratories.

(III) The Durable Medical Equipment Prosthetics/Orthotics and Supplies fee schedule of Medicare Part B, in the case of durable medical equipment.

However, if such services, supplies, or care is not reimbursable under Medicare Part B, as provided in this sub-subparagraph, the insurer may limit reimbursement to 80 percent of the maximum reimbursable allowance under workers’ compensation, as determined under s. 440.13 and rules adopted thereunder which are in effect at the time such services, supplies, or care is provided. Services, supplies, or care that is not reimbursable under Medicare or workers’ compensation is not required to be reimbursed by the insurer.

2. For purposes of subparagraph 1., the applicable fee schedule or payment limitation under Medicare is the fee schedule or payment limitation in effect on March 1 of the service year in which the services, supplies, or care is rendered and for the area in which such services, supplies, or care is rendered, and the applicable fee schedule or payment limitation applies to services, supplies, or care rendered during that service year, notwithstanding any subsequent change made to the fee schedule or payment limitation, except that it may not be less than the allowable amount under the applicable schedule of Medicare Part B for 2007 for medical services, supplies, and care subject to Medicare Part B. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “service year” means the period from March 1 through the end of February of the following year.

3. Subparagraph 1. does not allow the insurer to apply any limitation on the number of treatments or other utilization limits that apply under Medicare or workers’ compensation. An insurer that applies the allowable payment limitations of subparagraph 1. must reimburse a provider who lawfully provided care or treatment under the scope of his or her license, regardless of whether such provider is entitled to reimbursement under Medicare due to restrictions or limitations on the types or discipline of health care providers who may be reimbursed for particular procedures or procedure codes. However, subparagraph 1. does not prohibit an insurer from using the Medicare coding policies and payment methodologies of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, including applicable modifiers, to determine the appropriate amount of reimbursement for medical services, supplies, or care if the coding policy or payment methodology does not constitute a utilization limit.

4. If an insurer limits payment as authorized by subparagraph 1., the person providing such services, supplies, or care may not bill or attempt to collect from the insured any amount in excess of such limits, except for amounts that are not covered by the insured’s personal injury protection coverage due to the coinsurance amount or maximum policy limits.

5. An insurer may limit payment as authorized by this paragraph only if the insurance policy includes a notice at the time of issuance or renewal that the insurer may limit payment pursuant to the schedule of charges specified in this paragraph. A policy form approved by the office satisfies this requirement. If a provider submits a charge for an amount less than the amount allowed under subparagraph 1., the insurer may pay the amount of the charge submitted.

(b)1. An insurer or insured is not required to pay a claim or charges:

a. Made by a broker or by a person making a claim on behalf of a broker;

b. For any service or treatment that was not lawful at the time rendered;

c. To any person who knowingly submits a false or misleading statement relating to the claim or charges;

d. With respect to a bill or statement that does not substantially meet the applicable requirements of paragraph (d);

e. For any treatment or service that is upcoded, or that is unbundled when such treatment or services should be bundled, in accordance with paragraph (d). To facilitate prompt payment of lawful services, an insurer may change codes that it determines have been improperly or incorrectly upcoded or unbundled and may make payment based on the changed codes, without affecting the right of the provider to dispute the change by the insurer, if, before doing so, the insurer contacts the health care provider and discusses the reasons for the insurer’s change and the health care provider’s reason for the coding, or makes a reasonable good faith effort to do so, as documented in the insurer’s file; and

f. For medical services or treatment billed by a physician and not provided in a hospital unless such services are rendered by the physician or are incident to his or her professional services and are included on the physician’s bill, including documentation verifying that the physician is responsible for the medical services that were rendered and billed.

2. The Department of Health, in consultation with the appropriate professional licensing boards, shall adopt, by rule, a list of diagnostic tests deemed not to be medically necessary for use in the treatment of persons sustaining bodily injury covered by personal injury protection benefits under this section. The list shall be revised from time to time as determined by the Department of Health, in consultation with the respective professional licensing boards. Inclusion of a test on the list shall be based on lack of demonstrated medical value and a level of general acceptance by the relevant provider community and may not be dependent for results entirely upon subjective patient response. Notwithstanding its inclusion on a fee schedule in this subsection, an insurer or insured is not required to pay any charges or reimburse claims for an invalid diagnostic test as determined by the Department of Health.

(c) With respect to any treatment or service, other than medical services billed by a hospital or other provider for emergency services and care as defined in s. 395.002 or inpatient services rendered at a hospital-owned facility, the statement of charges must be furnished to the insurer by the provider and may not include, and the insurer is not required to pay, charges for treatment or services rendered more than 35 days before the postmark date or electronic transmission date of the statement, except for past due amounts previously billed on a timely basis under this paragraph, and except that, if the provider submits to the insurer a notice of initiation of treatment within 21 days after its first examination or treatment of the claimant, the statement may include charges for treatment or services rendered up to, but not more than, 75 days before the postmark date of the statement. The injured party is not liable for, and the provider may not bill the injured party for, charges that are unpaid because of the provider’s failure to comply with this paragraph. Any agreement requiring the injured person or insured to pay for such charges is unenforceable.

1. If the insured fails to furnish the provider with the correct name and address of the insured’s personal injury protection insurer, the provider has 35 days from the date the provider obtains the correct information to furnish the insurer with a statement of the charges. The insurer is not required to pay for such charges unless the provider includes with the statement documentary evidence that was provided by the insured during the 35-day period demonstrating that the provider reasonably relied on erroneous information from the insured and either:

a. A denial letter from the incorrect insurer; or

b. Proof of mailing, which may include an affidavit under penalty of perjury, reflecting timely mailing to the incorrect address or insurer.

2. For emergency services and care rendered in a hospital emergency department or for transport and treatment rendered by an ambulance provider licensed pursuant to part III of chapter 401, the provider is not required to furnish the statement of charges within the time periods established by this paragraph, and the insurer is not considered to have been furnished with notice of the amount of covered loss for purposes of paragraph (4)(b) until it receives a statement complying with paragraph (d), or copy thereof, which specifically identifies the place of service to be a hospital emergency department or an ambulance in accordance with billing standards recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

3. Each notice of the insured’s rights under s. 627.7401 must include the following statement in at least 12-point type:

BILLING REQUIREMENTS.—Florida law provides that with respect to any treatment or services, other than certain hospital and emergency services, the statement of charges furnished to the insurer by the provider may not include, and the insurer and the injured party are not required to pay, charges for treatment or services rendered more than 35 days before the postmark date of the statement, except for past due amounts previously billed on a timely basis, and except that, if the provider submits to the insurer a notice of initiation of treatment within 21 days after its first examination or treatment of the claimant, the statement may include charges for treatment or services rendered up to, but not more than, 75 days before the postmark date of the statement.

(d) All statements and bills for medical services rendered by a physician, hospital, clinic, or other person or institution shall be submitted to the insurer on a properly completed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 1500 form, UB 92 forms, or any other standard form approved by the office and adopted by the commission for purposes of this paragraph. All billings for such services rendered by providers must, to the extent applicable, comply with the CMS 1500 form instructions, the American Medical Association CPT Editorial Panel, and the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS); and must follow the Physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), the HCPCS in effect for the year in which services are rendered, and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) adopted by the United States Department of Health and Human Services in effect for the year in which services are rendered. All providers, other than hospitals, must include on the applicable claim form the professional license number of the provider in the line or space provided for “Signature of Physician or Supplier, Including Degrees or Credentials.” In determining compliance with applicable CPT and HCPCS coding, guidance shall be provided by the CPT or the HCPCS in effect for the year in which services were rendered, the Office of the Inspector General, Physicians Compliance Guidelines, and other authoritative treatises designated by rule by the Agency for Health Care Administration. A statement of medical services may not include charges for medical services of a person or entity that performed such services without possessing the valid licenses required to perform such services. For purposes of paragraph (4)(b), an insurer is not considered to have been furnished with notice of the amount of covered loss or medical bills due unless the statements or bills comply with this paragraph and are properly completed in their entirety as to all material provisions, with all relevant information being provided therein.

(e)1. At the initial treatment or service provided, each physician, other licensed professional, clinic, or other medical institution providing medical services upon which a claim for personal injury protection benefits is based shall require an insured person, or his or her guardian, to execute a disclosure and acknowledgment form, which reflects at a minimum that:

a. The insured, or his or her guardian, must countersign the form attesting to the fact that the services set forth therein were actually rendered;

b. The insured, or his or her guardian, has both the right and affirmative duty to confirm that the services were actually rendered;

c. The insured, or his or her guardian, was not solicited by any person to seek any services from the medical provider;

d. The physician, other licensed professional, clinic, or other medical institution rendering services for which payment is being claimed explained the services to the insured or his or her guardian; and

e. If the insured notifies the insurer in writing of a billing error, the insured may be entitled to a certain percentage of a reduction in the amounts paid by the insured’s motor vehicle insurer.

2. The physician, other licensed professional, clinic, or other medical institution rendering services for which payment is being claimed has the affirmative duty to explain the services rendered to the insured, or his or her guardian, so that the insured, or his or her guardian, countersigns the form with informed consent.

3. Countersignature by the insured, or his or her guardian, is not required for the reading of diagnostic tests or other services that are of such a nature that they are not required to be performed in the presence of the insured.

4. The licensed medical professional rendering treatment for which payment is being claimed must sign, by his or her own hand, the form complying with this paragraph.

5. The original completed disclosure and acknowledgment form shall be furnished to the insurer pursuant to paragraph (4)(b) and may not be electronically furnished.

6. The disclosure and acknowledgment form is not required for services billed by a provider for emergency services and care as defined in s. 395.002 rendered in a hospital emergency department, or for transport and treatment rendered by an ambulance provider licensed pursuant to part III of chapter 401.

7. The Financial Services Commission shall adopt, by rule, a standard disclosure and acknowledgment form to be used to fulfill the requirements of this paragraph.

8. As used in this paragraph, the term “countersign” or “countersignature” means a second or verifying signature, as on a previously signed document, and is not satisfied by the statement “signature on file” or any similar statement.

9. The requirements of this paragraph apply only with respect to the initial treatment or service of the insured by a provider. For subsequent treatments or service, the provider must maintain a patient log signed by the patient, in chronological order by date of service, which is consistent with the services being rendered to the patient as claimed. The requirement to maintain a patient log signed by the patient may be met by a hospital that maintains medical records as required by s. 395.3025 and applicable rules and makes such records available to the insurer upon request.

(f) Upon written notification by any person, an insurer shall investigate any claim of improper billing by a physician or other medical provider. The insurer shall determine if the insured was properly billed for only those services and treatments that the insured actually received. If the insurer determines that the insured has been improperly billed, the insurer shall notify the insured, the person making the written notification, and the provider of its findings and reduce the amount of payment to the provider by the amount determined to be improperly billed. If a reduction is made due to a written notification by any person, the insurer shall pay to the person 20 percent of the amount of the reduction, up to $500. If the provider is arrested due to the improper billing, the insurer shall pay to the person 40 percent of the amount of the reduction, up to $500.

(g) An insurer may not systematically downcode with the intent to deny reimbursement otherwise due. Such action constitutes a material misrepresentation under s. 626.9541(1)(i)2.

(h) As provided in s. 400.9905, an entity excluded from the definition of a clinic shall be deemed a clinic and must be licensed under part X of chapter 400 in order to receive reimbursement under ss. 627.730-627.7405. However, this licensing requirement does not apply to:

1. An entity wholly owned by a physician licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459, or by the physician and the spouse, parent, child, or sibling of the physician;

2. An entity wholly owned by a dentist licensed under chapter 466, or by the dentist and the spouse, parent, child, or sibling of the dentist;

3. An entity wholly owned by a chiropractic physician licensed under chapter 460, or by the chiropractic physician and the spouse, parent, child, or sibling of the chiropractic physician;

4. A hospital or ambulatory surgical center licensed under chapter 395;

5. An entity that wholly owns or is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by a hospital or hospitals licensed under chapter 395;

6. An entity that is a clinical facility affiliated with an accredited medical school at which training is provided for medical students, residents, or fellows;

7. An entity that is certified under 42 C.F.R. part 485, subpart H; or

8. An entity that is owned by a publicly traded corporation, either directly or indirectly through its subsidiaries, that has $250 million or more in total annual sales of health care services provided by licensed health care practitioners if one or more of the persons responsible for the operations of the entity are health care practitioners who are licensed in this state and who are responsible for supervising the business activities of the entity and the entity’s compliance with state law for purposes of this section.

(6) DISCOVERY OF FACTS ABOUT AN INJURED PERSON; DISPUTES.—

(a) If a request is made by an insurer providing personal injury protection benefits under ss. 627.730-627.7405 against whom a claim has been made, an employer must furnish, in a form approved by the office, a sworn statement of the earnings, since the time of the bodily injury and for a reasonable period before the injury, of the person upon whose injury the claim is based.

(b) Every physician, hospital, clinic, or other medical institution providing, before or after bodily injury upon which a claim for personal injury protection insurance benefits is based, any products, services, or accommodations in relation to that or any other injury, or in relation to a condition claimed to be connected with that or any other injury, shall, if requested by the insurer against whom the claim has been made, furnish a written report of the history, condition, treatment, dates, and costs of such treatment of the injured person and why the items identified by the insurer were reasonable in amount and medically necessary, together with a sworn statement that the treatment or services rendered were reasonable and necessary with respect to the bodily injury sustained and identifying which portion of the expenses for such treatment or services was incurred as a result of such bodily injury, and produce, and allow the inspection and copying of, his or her or its records regarding such history, condition, treatment, dates, and costs of treatment if this does not limit the introduction of evidence at trial. Such sworn statement must read as follows: “Under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing, and the facts alleged are true, to the best of my knowledge and belief.” A cause of action for violation of the physician-patient privilege or invasion of the right of privacy may not be brought against any physician, hospital, clinic, or other medical institution complying with this section. The person requesting such records and such sworn statement shall pay all reasonable costs connected therewith. If an insurer makes a written request for documentation or information under this paragraph within 30 days after having received notice of the amount of a covered loss under paragraph (4)(a), the amount or the partial amount that is the subject of the insurer’s inquiry is overdue if the insurer does not pay in accordance with paragraph (4)(b) or within 10 days after the insurer’s receipt of the requested documentation or information, whichever occurs later. As used in this paragraph, the term “receipt” includes, but is not limited to, inspection and copying pursuant to this paragraph. An insurer that requests documentation or information pertaining to reasonableness of charges or medical necessity under this paragraph without a reasonable basis for such requests as a general business practice is engaging in an unfair trade practice under the insurance code.

(c) In the event of a dispute regarding an insurer’s right to discovery of facts under this section, the insurer may petition a court of competent jurisdiction to enter an order permitting such discovery. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to all persons having an interest, and must specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the discovery. In order to protect against annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, as justice requires, the court may enter an order refusing discovery or specifying conditions of discovery and may order payments of costs and expenses of the proceeding, including reasonable fees for the appearance of attorneys at the proceedings, as justice requires.

(d) The injured person shall be furnished, upon request, a copy of all information obtained by the insurer under this section, and pay a reasonable charge, if required by the insurer.

(e) Notice to an insurer of the existence of a claim may not be unreasonably withheld by an insured.

(f) In a dispute between the insured and the insurer, or between an assignee of the insured’s rights and the insurer, upon request, the insurer must notify the insured or the assignee that the policy limits under this section have been reached within 15 days after the limits have been reached.

(g) An insured seeking benefits under ss. 627.730–627.7405, including an omnibus insured, must comply with the terms of the policy, which include, but are not limited to, submitting to an examination under oath. The scope of questioning during the examination under oath is limited to relevant information or information that could reasonably be expected to lead to relevant information. Compliance with this paragraph is a condition precedent to receiving benefits. An insurer that, as a general business practice as determined by the office, requests an examination under oath of an insured or an omnibus insured without a reasonable basis is subject to s. 626.9541.

(7) MENTAL AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION OF INJURED PERSON; REPORTS.—

(a) Whenever the mental or physical condition of an injured person covered by personal injury protection is material to any claim that has been or may be made for past or future personal injury protection insurance benefits, such person shall, upon the request of an insurer, submit to mental or physical examination by a physician or physicians. The costs of any examinations requested by an insurer shall be borne entirely by the insurer. Such examination shall be conducted within the municipality where the insured is receiving treatment, or in a location reasonably accessible to the insured, which, for purposes of this paragraph, means any location within the municipality in which the insured resides, or any location within 10 miles by road of the insured’s residence, provided such location is within the county in which the insured resides. If the examination is to be conducted in a location reasonably accessible to the insured, and if there is no qualified physician to conduct the examination in a location reasonably accessible to the insured, such examination shall be conducted in an area of the closest proximity to the insured’s residence. Personal protection insurers are authorized to include reasonable provisions in personal injury protection insurance policies for mental and physical examination of those claiming personal injury protection insurance benefits. An insurer may not withdraw payment of a treating physician without the consent of the injured person covered by the personal injury protection, unless the insurer first obtains a valid report by a Florida physician licensed under the same chapter as the treating physician whose treatment authorization is sought to be withdrawn, stating that treatment was not reasonable, related, or necessary. A valid report is one that is prepared and signed by the physician examining the injured person or reviewing the treatment records of the injured person and is factually supported by the examination and treatment records if reviewed and that has not been modified by anyone other than the physician. The physician preparing the report must be in active practice, unless the physician is physically disabled. Active practice means that during the 3 years immediately preceding the date of the physical examination or review of the treatment records the physician must have devoted professional time to the active clinical practice of evaluation, diagnosis, or treatment of medical conditions or to the instruction of students in an accredited health professional school or accredited residency program or a clinical research program that is affiliated with an accredited health professional school or teaching hospital or accredited residency program. The physician preparing a report at the request of an insurer and physicians rendering expert opinions on behalf of persons claiming medical benefits for personal injury protection, or on behalf of an insured through an attorney or another entity, shall maintain, for at least 3 years, copies of all examination reports as medical records and shall maintain, for at least 3 years, records of all payments for the examinations and reports. Neither an insurer nor any person acting at the direction of or on behalf of an insurer may materially change an opinion in a report prepared under this paragraph or direct the physician preparing the report to change such opinion. The denial of a payment as the result of such a changed opinion constitutes a material misrepresentation under s. 626.9541(1)(i)2.; however, this provision does not preclude the insurer from calling to the attention of the physician errors of fact in the report based upon information in the claim file.

(b) If requested by the person examined, a party causing an examination to be made shall deliver to him or her a copy of every written report concerning the examination rendered by an examining physician, at least one of which reports must set out the examining physician’s findings and conclusions in detail. After such request and delivery, the party causing the examination to be made is entitled, upon request, to receive from the person examined every written report available to him or her or his or her representative concerning any examination, previously or thereafter made, of the same mental or physical condition. By requesting and obtaining a report of the examination so ordered, or by taking the deposition of the examiner, the person examined waives any privilege he or she may have, in relation to the claim for benefits, regarding the testimony of every other person who has examined, or may thereafter examine, him or her in respect to the same mental or physical condition. If a person unreasonably refuses to submit to or fails to appear at an examination, the personal injury protection carrier is no longer liable for subsequent personal injury protection benefits. An insured’s refusal to submit to or failure to appear at two examinations raises a rebuttable presumption that the insured’s refusal or failure was unreasonable.

(8) APPLICABILITY OF PROVISION REGULATING ATTORNEY FEES.—With respect to any dispute under the provisions of ss. 627.730-627.7405 between the insured and the insurer, or between an assignee of an insured’s rights and the insurer, the provisions of s. 768.79 apply, except as provided in subsections (10) and (15), and except that any attorney fees recovered must:

(a) Comply with prevailing professional standards;

(b) Not overstate or inflate the number of hours reasonably necessary for a case of comparable skill or complexity; and

Upon request by either party, a judge must make written findings, substantiated by evidence presented at trial or any hearings associated therewith, that any award of attorney fees complies with this subsection. Attorney fees recovered under ss. 627.730-627.7405 must be calculated without regard to a contingency risk multiplier.

(9) PREFERRED PROVIDERS.—An insurer may negotiate and contract with preferred providers for the benefits described in this section, which include health care providers licensed under chapter 458, chapter 459, chapter 460, chapter 461, or chapter 463. The insurer may provide an option to an insured to use a preferred provider at the time of purchasing the policy for personal injury protection benefits, if the requirements of this subsection are met. If the insured elects to use a provider who is not a preferred provider, whether the insured purchased a preferred provider policy or a nonpreferred provider policy, the medical benefits provided by the insurer shall be as required by this section. If the insured elects to use a provider who is a preferred provider, the insurer may pay medical benefits in excess of the benefits required by this section and may waive or lower the amount of any deductible that applies to such medical benefits. If the insurer offers a preferred provider policy to a policyholder or applicant, it must also offer a nonpreferred provider policy. The insurer shall provide each insured with a current roster of preferred providers in the county in which the insured resides at the time of purchase of such policy, and shall make such list available for public inspection during regular business hours at the insurer’s principal office within the state.

(10) DEMAND LETTER.—

(a) As a condition precedent to filing any action for benefits under this section, written notice of an intent to initiate litigation must be provided to the insurer. Such notice may not be sent until the claim is overdue, including any additional time the insurer has to pay the claim pursuant to paragraph (4)(b).

(b) The notice must state that it is a “demand letter under s. 627.736” and state with specificity:

1. The name of the insured upon which such benefits are being sought, including a copy of the assignment giving rights to the claimant if the claimant is not the insured.

2. The claim number or policy number upon which such claim was originally submitted to the insurer.

3. To the extent applicable, the name of any medical provider who rendered to an insured the treatment, services, accommodations, or supplies that form the basis of such claim; and an itemized statement specifying each exact amount, the date of treatment, service, or accommodation, and the type of benefit claimed to be due. A completed form satisfying the requirements of paragraph (5)(d) or the lost-wage statement previously submitted may be used as the itemized statement. To the extent that the demand involves an insurer’s withdrawal of payment under paragraph (7)(a) for future treatment not yet rendered, the claimant shall attach a copy of the insurer’s notice withdrawing such payment and an itemized statement of the type, frequency, and duration of future treatment claimed to be reasonable and medically necessary.

(c) Each notice required by this subsection must be delivered to the insurer by United States certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. Such postal costs shall be reimbursed by the insurer if requested by the claimant in the notice, when the insurer pays the claim. Such notice must be sent to the person and address specified by the insurer for the purposes of receiving notices under this subsection. Each licensed insurer, whether domestic, foreign, or alien, shall file with the office the name and address of the designated person to whom notices must be sent which the office shall make available on its Internet website. The name and address on file with the office pursuant to s. 624.422 is deemed the authorized representative to accept notice pursuant to this subsection if no other designation has been made.

(d) If, within 30 days after receipt of notice by the insurer, the overdue claim specified in the notice is paid by the insurer together with applicable interest and a penalty of 10 percent of the overdue amount paid by the insurer, subject to a maximum penalty of $250, no action may be brought against the insurer. If the demand involves an insurer’s withdrawal of payment under paragraph (7)(a) for future treatment not yet rendered, no action may be brought against the insurer if, within 30 days after its receipt of the notice, the insurer mails to the person filing the notice a written statement of the insurer’s agreement to pay for such treatment in accordance with the notice and to pay a penalty of 10 percent, subject to a maximum penalty of $250, when it pays for such future treatment in accordance with the requirements of this section. To the extent the insurer determines not to pay any amount demanded, the penalty is not payable in any subsequent action. For purposes of this subsection, payment or the insurer’s agreement shall be treated as being made on the date a draft or other valid instrument that is equivalent to payment, or the insurer’s written statement of agreement, is placed in the United States mail in a properly addressed, postpaid envelope, or if not so posted, on the date of delivery. The insurer is not obligated to pay any attorney fees if the insurer pays the claim or mails its agreement to pay for future treatment within the time prescribed by this subsection.

(e) The applicable statute of limitation for an action under this section shall be tolled for 30 business days by the mailing of the notice required by this subsection.

(11) FAILURE TO PAY VALID CLAIMS; UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE PRACTICE.—

(a) An insurer is engaging in a prohibited unfair or deceptive practice that is subject to the penalties provided in s. 626.9521 and the office has the powers and duties specified in ss. 626.9561-626.9601 if the insurer, with such frequency so as to indicate a general business practice:

1. Fails to pay valid claims for personal injury protection; or

2. Fails to pay valid claims until receipt of the notice required by subsection (10).

(b) Notwithstanding s. 501.212, the Department of Legal Affairs may investigate and initiate actions for a violation of this subsection, including, but not limited to, the powers and duties specified in part II of chapter 501.

(12) CIVIL ACTION FOR INSURANCE FRAUD.—An insurer shall have a cause of action against any person convicted of, or who, regardless of adjudication of guilt, pleads guilty or nolo contendere to insurance fraud under s. 817.234, patient brokering under s. 817.505, or kickbacks under s. 456.054, associated with a claim for personal injury protection benefits in accordance with this section. An insurer prevailing in an action brought under this subsection may recover compensatory, consequential, and punitive damages subject to the requirements and limitations of part II of chapter 768, and attorney’s fees and costs incurred in litigating a cause of action against any person convicted of, or who, regardless of adjudication of guilt, pleads guilty or nolo contendere to insurance fraud under s. 817.234, patient brokering under s. 817.505, or kickbacks under s. 456.054, associated with a claim for personal injury protection benefits in accordance with this section.

(13) MINIMUM BENEFIT COVERAGE.—If the Financial Services Commission determines that the cost savings under personal injury protection insurance benefits paid by insurers have been realized due to the provisions of this act, prior legislative reforms, or other factors, the commission may increase the minimum $10,000 benefit coverage requirement. In establishing the amount of such increase, the commission must determine that the additional premium for such coverage is approximately equal to the premium cost savings that have been realized for the personal injury protection coverage with limits of $10,000.

(14) FRAUD ADVISORY NOTICE.—Upon receiving notice of a claim under this section, an insurer shall provide a notice to the insured or to a person for whom a claim for reimbursement for diagnosis or treatment of injuries has been filed, advising that:

(a) Pursuant to s. 626.9892, the Department of Financial Services may pay rewards of up to $25,000 to persons providing information leading to the arrest and conviction of persons committing crimes investigated by the Division of Criminal Investigations arising from violations of s. 440.105, s. 624.15, s. 626.9541, s. 626.989, or s. 817.234.

(b) Solicitation of a person injured in a motor vehicle crash for purposes of filing personal injury protection or tort claims could be a violation of s. 817.234, s. 817.505, or the rules regulating The Florida Bar and should be immediately reported to the Division of Criminal Investigations if such conduct has taken place.

(15) ALL CLAIMS BROUGHT IN A SINGLE ACTION.—In any civil action to recover personal injury protection benefits brought by a claimant pursuant to this section against an insurer, all claims related to the same health care provider for the same injured person shall be brought in one action, unless good cause is shown why such claims should be brought separately. If the court determines that a civil action is filed for a claim that should have been brought in a prior civil action, the court may not award attorney’s fees to the claimant.

(16) SECURE ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSFER.—A notice, documentation, transmission, or communication of any kind required or authorized under ss. 627.730-627.7405 may be transmitted electronically if it is transmitted by secure electronic data transfer that is consistent with state and federal privacy and security laws.

(17) NONREIMBURSABLE CLAIMS.—Claims generated as a result of activities that are unlawful pursuant to s. 817.505 are not reimbursable under the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law.

History.—s. 7, ch. 71-252; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 4, ch. 76-266; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 33, ch. 77-468; s. 3, ch. 78-374; s. 114, ch. 79-40; s. 165, ch. 79-164; s. 239, ch. 79-400; s. 3, ch. 80-206; s. 430, ch. 81-259; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 554, 563, ch. 82-243; s. 31, ch. 87-226; s. 1, ch. 87-282; ss. 19, 20, 21, 22, ch. 88-370; s. 2, ch. 89-243; s. 1, ch. 89-313; s. 40, ch. 90-119; s. 7, ch. 90-232; s. 11, ch. 90-248; s. 36, ch. 90-295; s. 7, ch. 91-106; s. 66, ch. 91-282; s. 84, ch. 92-318; s. 7, ch. 93-289; s. 1, ch. 94-123; s. 8, ch. 95-202; s. 83, ch. 95-211; s. 381, ch. 96-406; s. 1738, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 98-270; s. 262, ch. 99-8; s. 62, ch. 2001-63; s. 6, ch. 2001-271; s. 1195, ch. 2003-261; ss. 8, 19, ch. 2003-411; s. 124, ch. 2004-5; s. 121, ch. 2005-2; s. 13, ch. 2006-305; ss. 13, 20, ch. 2007-324; s. 153, ch. 2008-4; s. 22, ch. 2008-220; s. 86, ch. 2009-21; s. 17, ch. 2012-151; ss. 10, 11, ch. 2012-197; s. 14, ch. 2013-93; s. 7, ch. 2015-135; s. 6, ch. 2016-133; s. 23, ch. 2016-165; s. 75, ch. 2018-106; s. 31, ch. 2020-9; s. 3, ch. 2021-96; s. 19, ch. 2021-143; s. 22, ch. 2023-15; s. 19, ch. 2025-4.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 755 cases (118 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case: Allstate Ins. Co. v. Orthopedic Specialists, etc., 212 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Orthopedic Specialists, etc., 212 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 2017). · cites it 68× “Any amounts payable under this coverage shall be subject to any and all limitations, authorized by section 627.736, or any other provisions of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, as enacted, amended or otherwise continued in the law, including, but not limited to, all fee…”

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 141 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2013). · cites it 62× “§ 627.736, Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis supplied).”

Menendez v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 35 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2010). · cites it 42× “§ 627.736(1 l)(e), Fla. Stat. (2001). The current version of the statute tolls the statute of limitations for thirty business days.”

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001). · cites it 52× “[ [4] ] § 627.736, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added).”

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2006). · cites it 26× “79 to PIP cases would completely circumvent and thwart the purposes of the No-Fault Act and the specific provisions relating to PIP benefits found in section 627.736. Therefore, it is clear to me that the Legislature certainly did not intend for section 768.”

Progressive Select Ins. Co. v. Florida Hosp. Med. Ctr., Etc., 260 So. 3d 219 (Fla. 2018). · cites it 38× “The Fourth District concluded that the deductible should be applied after charges are reduced under any fee schedule found in section 627.736. See id. at 24 . Accordingly, it certified conflict with the Fifth District in Progressive .”

Warren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2005). · cites it 43× “Section 627.736, Florida Statutes (1999), sets forth required PIP benefits, which are triggered if a loss is reasonable, necessary, and related to a motor vehicle accident.”

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Santa Fe Med. Ctr., 21 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). · cites it 36× “Subsection (4)(b) pertains to circumstances where “the insurer has either reduced, omitted, or declined” payment of PIP claims that are reasonable, necessary, and related, whereas subsection (7)(a) sets forth the necessary requirements that an insurer must satisfy before it may…”

Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 2010). · cites it 16× “2000) (indicating that attendance at a PIP medical examination is a condition precedent to the receipt of subsequent PIP benefits and that section 627.736 contemplates “a situation .”

Chiropractic v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 21 So. 3d 858 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). · cites it 48× “§ 627.736(4), Fla. Stat. (2009). Under subsection (b) of this provision, PIP benefits are due to be paid within thirty days following receipt of written notice of a covered loss by the insured, and, are “overdue” if not paid within that time: (b) Personal injury protection…”

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc., 961 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2007). · cites it 35× “The "Required Personal Injury Protection" provision, or the PIP statute, is codified at section 627.736 and is "an integral part of the no-fault statutory scheme.”

Orthopedic Specialists, as Assignee of Kelli Serridge v. Allstate Ins. Co., 177 So. 3d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). · cites it 40× “Historical Context Provisions of the PIP statute, section 627.736, Florida Statutes, are at the center of the instant controversy.”

Show all 755 citing cases →

— 627.736(1) — 112 cases

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 141 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2013). “§ 627.736, Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis supplied).”

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2006). “79 to PIP cases would completely circumvent and thwart the purposes of the No-Fault Act and the specific provisions relating to PIP benefits found in section 627.736. Therefore, it is clear to me that the Legislature certainly did not intend for section 768.”

Gov. Employees Ins. Co. v. Novak, 453 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1984).

Lasky v. State Farm Ins. Co., 296 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1974).

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Orthopedic Specialists, etc., 212 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 2017). “Any amounts payable under this coverage shall be subject to any and all limitations, authorized by section 627.736, or any other provisions of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, as enacted, amended or otherwise continued in the law, including, but not limited to, all fee…”

— 627.736(1)(a) — 70 cases

Malu v. Sec. Nat. Ins. Co., 898 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2005).

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc., 961 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2007). “The "Required Personal Injury Protection" provision, or the PIP statute, is codified at section 627.736 and is "an integral part of the no-fault statutory scheme.”

Progressive Select Ins. Co. v. Florida Hosp. Med. Ctr., Etc., 260 So. 3d 219 (Fla. 2018). “The Fourth District concluded that the deductible should be applied after charges are reduced under any fee schedule found in section 627.736. See id. at 24 . Accordingly, it certified conflict with the Fifth District in Progressive .”

Progressive v. Florida Hosp., 236 So. 3d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

— 627.736(1)(a)(1) — 2 cases

Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v. The Right Spinal Clinic, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2022).

— 627.736(1)(a)(10) — 1 case

Nationwide v. Cent. Fla. Physiatrists, 851 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

— 627.736(1)(a)(3) — 1 case

Med. Ctr. of the Palm Beaches v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 202 So. 3d 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

— 627.736(1)(a)(4) — 1 case

Med. Ctr. of the Palm Beaches v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 202 So. 3d 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

— 627.736(1)(a)(5) — 4 cases

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Finlay Diagnostic Ctr., Inc., a/a/o Maria P. Cruz (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v. Zeya (M.D. Fla. 2021).

Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v. The Right Spinal Clinic, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2022).

State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Fakhoury Med. & Chiropractic Ctr., P.L.L.C. (M.D. Fla. 2023).

— 627.736(1)(b) — 10 cases

Progressive v. Florida Hosp., 236 So. 3d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Worthy, 447 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 410 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Crotts v. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co., 476 So. 2d 1357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

— 627.736(1)(c) — 4 cases

Mercury Ins. Co. v. Emergency Physicians of Cent., 182 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Int'l Bankers Ins. Co. v. Arnone, 552 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1989).

Int'l Bankers Ins. Co. v. Arnone, 528 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

— 627.736(10) — 24 cases

Menendez v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 35 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2010). “§ 627.736(1 l)(e), Fla. Stat. (2001). The current version of the statute tolls the statute of limitations for thirty business days.”

Nationwide v. Cent. Fla. Physiatrists, 851 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jewell, 862 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Coastal Wellness Ctrs., Inc. v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 309 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

— 627.736(10)(a) — 7 cases

Virga v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 215 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2016).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Coral Gables Chiropractic PLLC, A/A/O Johander Santa C. Hernandez (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

Florida Pain & Rehab. of West Dade v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co. (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

Gables Ins. Recovery, Inc., a/a/o Alberto Galvez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).

— 627.736(10)(b) — 5 cases

Kingsway Amigo Ins. Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc., 63 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

MRI Assocs. of Am., LLC v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 61 So. 3d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Mercury Indem. Co. of Am. v. Pan Am Diagnostic of Orlando, a/a/o Joceline Pierrilus (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).

Mercury Idemnity Co. of Am. Vs Cent. Florida Med. & Chiropractic Ctr., Inc. d/b/a Sterling Med. Grp. a/a/o Sthefany Santiago (Fla. 5th DCA 2023).

David Rivera v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

— 627.736(10)(b)(3) — 1 case

Mercury Indem. Co. of Am. v. Pan Am Diagnostic of Orlando, a/a/o Joceline Pierrilus (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).

— 627.736(10)(c) — 1 case

Florida Pain & Rehab. of West Dade v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co. (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

— 627.736(10)(d) — 8 cases

USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Emergency Physicians of Cent. Florida, 200 So. 3d 153 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Florida Pain & Rehab. of West Dade v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co. (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

Baker Fam. Chiropractic, LLC a/a/o Hahn Dinh Vs Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. (Fla. 5th DCA 2023).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Coral Gables Chiropractic PLLC, A/A/O Johander Santa C. Hernandez (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

— 627.736(10)(e) — 2 cases

Ray Med. Ctr., Inc., A/A/O Mairo De Leon v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

— 627.736(11) — 11 cases

Dimitri v. Com. Ctr. of Miami Master Assoc., 253 So. 3d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Progressive Exp. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Menendez, 979 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

MRI Assocs. of Am., LLC v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 61 So. 3d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Bristol West Ins. Co. v. MD Readers, Inc., 52 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

— 627.736(11)(a) — 9 cases

Nichols v. State Farm Mut., 851 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Marlin Diagnostics v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO., 897 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Bristol West Ins. Co. v. MD Readers, Inc., 52 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

— 627.736(11)(b) — 4 cases

Bristol West Ins. Co. v. MD Readers, Inc., 52 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

MRI Assocs. of Am., LLC v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 61 So. 3d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Progressive Exp. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Menendez, 979 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

David Rivera v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

— 627.736(11)(d) — 3 cases

Nichols v. State Farm Mut., 851 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Arlen House Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Rockhill Ins. Co. (S.D. Fla. 2023).

— 627.736(11)(e) — 1 case

Arlen House Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Rockhill Ins. Co. (S.D. Fla. 2023).

— 627.736(12) — 3 cases

Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. v. MSPA Claims, 1, 261 So. 3d 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Nationwide Mut. Co. v. Ft. Myers Total Rehab Ctr., Inc., 657 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. v. MSPA Claims, 1, 261 So. 3d 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

— 627.736(1l)(a) — 1 case

— 627.736(1l)(d) — 1 case

Am. Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 2011).

— 627.736(2) — 6 cases

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Fla. v. Steck, 778 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Chappelear v. Allstate Ins. Co., 347 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Travelers Indem. Co. of Am. v. McInroy, 342 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Star Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jacksonville Chiropractic, Inc., A/A/O Marie St. Hilaire (Fla. 5th DCA 2026).

— 627.736(2)(a) — 4 cases

Priesman v. Meridian Mut. Ins., 490 N.W.2d 314 (Mich. 1992).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Castaneda, 339 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Star Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jacksonville Chiropractic, Inc., A/A/O Marie St. Hilaire (Fla. 5th DCA 2026).

Lopez v. Fid. & Cas. Co., 384 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

— 627.736(2)(b) — 2 cases

Travelers Indem. Co. of Am. v. McInroy, 342 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Jones v. Stand. Guar. Ins. Co., 539 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

— 627.736(2)(b)(2) — 1 case

Priesman v. Meridian Mut. Ins., 490 N.W.2d 314 (Mich. 1992).

— 627.736(2)(b2) — 1 case

Travelers Indem. Co. of Am. v. McInroy, 342 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

— 627.736(3) — 61 cases

Rollins v. Pizzarelli, 761 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2000).

Caruso v. Baumle, 880 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 2004).

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rudnick, 761 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 2000).

Norman v. Farrow, 880 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 2004).

Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enter., Inc., 403 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 1981).

— 627.736(3)(a) — 7 cases

White v. Reserve Ins. Co., 299 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

Reyes v. Banks, 292 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Williams v. Gateway Ins. Co., 331 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 1976).

Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Oller, 313 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Gordon, 319 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

— 627.736(3)(b) — 11 cases

Rollins v. Pizzarelli, 761 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2000).

White v. Reserve Ins. Co., 299 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 387 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1980).

Reyes v. Banks, 292 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Oller, 313 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

— 627.736(4) — 71 cases

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001). “[ [4] ] § 627.736, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added).”

Comeau v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 356 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 1978).

Chiropractic v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 21 So. 3d 858 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). “§ 627.736(4), Fla. Stat. (2009). Under subsection (b) of this provision, PIP benefits are due to be paid within thirty days following receipt of written notice of a covered loss by the insured, and, are “overdue” if not paid within that time: (b) Personal injury protection…”

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bermudez, 980 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. v. MSPA Claims, 1, 261 So. 3d 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

— 627.736(4)(B) — 1 case

Fortune Ins. Co. v. Pacheco, 695 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

— 627.736(4)(a) — 5 cases

Stand. Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1990).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Pressley, 28 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Tienna, 780 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Quanstrom v. Stand. Guar. Ins. Co., 504 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Choter v. Allstate Ins., 37 Fla. Supp. 2d 113 (Fla. Miami-Dade Cty. Ct. 1989).

— 627.736(4)(b) — 93 cases

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 2003).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Santa Fe Med. Ctr., 21 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). “Subsection (4)(b) pertains to circumstances where “the insurer has either reduced, omitted, or declined” payment of PIP claims that are reasonable, necessary, and related, whereas subsection (7)(a) sets forth the necessary requirements that an insurer must satisfy before it may…”

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001). “[ [4] ] § 627.736, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added).”

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. a 1st Choice Healthcare Sys., 21 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

— 627.736(4)(b)(6) — 2 cases

Coral Gables Chiropractic Pllc v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 199 So. 3d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v. Zeya (M.D. Fla. 2021).

— 627.736(4)(b)(c) — 1 case

Orion Ins. v. Magnetic Imag. Sys. I, 696 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

— 627.736(4)(c) — 26 cases

Mercury Ins. Co. v. Emergency Physicians of Cent., 182 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001). “[ [4] ] § 627.736, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added).”

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 2003).

Am. Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 2011).

— 627.736(4)(d) — 60 cases

State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kraver, 364 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Niglio v. Omaha Prop. & Cas. Ins., 679 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Stand. Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1990).

Staley v. Florida Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 328 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Heredia v. Allstate Ins. Co., 358 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 1978).

— 627.736(4)(d)(1) — 7 cases

Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Castagna, 368 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 1979).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Link, 416 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Pridgen, 339 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Arnold v. South Carolina Ins. Co., 425 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

Cavalier Ins. Corp. v. Myles, 347 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

— 627.736(4)(d)(3) — 1 case

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ryan, 500 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

— 627.736(4)(d)(4) — 5 cases

Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co., 560 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Indus. Fire & Cas. Ins. v. Augustin, 412 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Progressive Cas. Ins. v. Watson, 696 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Thompson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 539 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

— 627.736(4)(d)(4)(a) — 3 cases

Fernandez v. Alonso, 375 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hartzog, 917 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Pearson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 560 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

— 627.736(4)(d)(l) — 5 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Nicholson, 337 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Laninfa v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins., 656 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Esker v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 593 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Jackson v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 502 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Jean v. Aetna Life Ins., 7 Fla. Supp. 2d 106 (Fla. Volusia Cty. Ct. 1984).

— 627.736(4)(dX2) — 1 case

Carter v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 423 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

— 627.736(4)(e) — 2 cases

Bradley v. AID Ins. Co., 629 P.2d 720 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981).

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Wolfson, 348 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

— 627.736(4)(e)(l) — 1 case

Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Elchehimi, 249 S.W.3d 430 (Tex. 2008).

— 627.736(4)(f) — 10 cases

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rudnick, 761 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 2000).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Swearingen, 590 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

Kaklamanos v. Allstate Ins. Co., 796 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

STATE FARM AUTO. INS. v. Klinglesmith, 717 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Christian v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 537 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

— 627.736(4)(g) — 1 case

Bosem v. Com. & Indus. Ins. Co., 35 So. 3d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

— 627.736(4)(h) — 3 cases

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Law Offices of Libman, 46 So. 3d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins., 117 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 2013).

Star Cas. Ins. Co. v. Gables Ins. Recovery, Inc., a/a/o Ana Maria Correa (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).

— 627.736(5) — 63 cases

Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pinnacle Med., Inc., 753 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2000).

Delta Cas. Co. v. Pinnacle Med., Inc., 721 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Orion Ins. v. Magnetic Imag. Sys. I, 696 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Rittman v. Allstate Ins. Co., 727 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Shaw v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 37 So. 3d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

— 627.736(5)(A)(1) — 2 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co v. Care Wellness Ctr., LLC, a/a/o Virginia Bardon-diaz, 240 So. 3d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Progressive Select Ins. v. David a. Blum, M.d., P.A. a/a/o Vanessa Moreno, 238 So. 3d 852 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

— 627.736(5)(B)(5) — 2 cases

Progressive Auto Pro v. One Stop Med., 985 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Allstate Ins. v. Advantage Open MRI, Inc., 17 So. 3d 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

— 627.736(5)(a) — 100 cases

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 141 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2013). “§ 627.736, Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis supplied).”

Orthopedic Specialists, as Assignee of Kelli Serridge v. Allstate Ins. Co., 177 So. 3d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). “Historical Context Provisions of the PIP statute, section 627.736, Florida Statutes, are at the center of the instant controversy.”

Kingsway Amigo Ins. Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc., 63 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

— 627.736(5)(a)(1) — 8 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. M R I Assocs. of Tampa, Inc. d/ b/ a Park Place M R I, 252 So. 3d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Coastal Wellness Ctrs., Inc. v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 309 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co v. Care Wellness Ctr., LLC, a/a/o Virginia Bardon-diaz, 240 So. 3d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. M R I Assocs. of Tampa, Inc. d/ b/ a Park Place M R I (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Gady Abramson, D.C., P.A., Etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

— 627.736(5)(a)(1)(a) — 3 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. M R I Assocs. of Tampa, Inc. d/ b/ a Park Place M R I, 252 So. 3d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. M R I Assocs. of Tampa, Inc. d/ b/ a Park Place M R I (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

MRI Assocs. of Tampa, Inc., etc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Fla. 2021).

— 627.736(5)(a)(1)(f) — 4 cases

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lauderhill Med. Ctr., LLC a/a/o Robert White (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Safeco Ins. Co. of Illinois v. Md Now Med. Centers, Inc. d/b/a Md Now Patient: Shelley Holmstock (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Gady Abramson, D.C., P.A., Etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Chironex Enter., Inc. a/a/o Emily Echegaray (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

— 627.736(5)(a)(2) — 11 cases

Geico Indem. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Markley Chiropractic & Acupuncture, LLC, 226 So. 3d 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. M R I Assocs. of Tampa, Inc. d/ b/ a Park Place M R I, 252 So. 3d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Kingsway Amigo Ins. Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc., 63 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Coastal Wellness Ctrs., Inc. v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 309 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

— 627.736(5)(a)(2)(a) — 1 case

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Markley Chiropractic & Acupuncture, LLC, 226 So. 3d 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

— 627.736(5)(a)(2)(f) — 14 cases

Florida Wellness & Rehab. Ctr. v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 201 So. 3d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Perez, 111 So. 3d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Markley Chiropractic & Acupuncture, LLC, 226 So. 3d 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Cent. Magnetic Imaging Open MRI of Plantation, Ltd. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 789 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Geico Indem. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

— 627.736(5)(a)(3) — 5 cases

Cent. Magnetic Imaging Open MRI of Plantation, Ltd. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 789 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Perez, 111 So. 3d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. AFO Imaging, Inc., 71 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Virga v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 215 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2016).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lauderhill Med. Ctr., LLC a/a/o Robert White (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

— 627.736(5)(a)(4) — 7 cases

Coastal Neurology, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 271 F.R.D. 538 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Cent. Magnetic Imaging Open MRI of Plantation, Ltd. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 789 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

DWFII Corp. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 271 F.R.D. 676 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

SOCC, P.L. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 95 So. 3d 903 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

Kuhr v. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (M.D. Fla. 2021).

— 627.736(5)(a)(5) — 4 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. M R I Assocs. of Tampa, Inc. d/ b/ a Park Place M R I, 252 So. 3d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Geico Gen. Ins. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 90 So. 3d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Virga v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 215 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2016).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. M R I Assocs. of Tampa, Inc. d/ b/ a Park Place M R I (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

— 627.736(5)(a)(l) — 3 cases

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Markley Chiropractic & Acupuncture, LLC, 226 So. 3d 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Virga v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 215 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2016).

Scenic Health All., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 124 F. Supp. 3d 1291 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

— 627.736(5)(b) — 28 cases

Warren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2005). “Section 627.736, Florida Statutes (1999), sets forth required PIP benefits, which are triggered if a loss is reasonable, necessary, and related to a motor vehicle accident.”

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Warren, 805 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Millennium Diagnostic v. Sec. Nat. Ins., 882 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 141 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2013). “§ 627.736, Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis supplied).”

Progressive Auto Pro v. One Stop Med., 985 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

— 627.736(5)(b)(1) — 1 case

PROF. CONS. SERV. v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 849 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

— 627.736(5)(b)(1)(b) — 1 case

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cent. Therapy Ctr., Inc., a/a/o Vanessa Lopez (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).

— 627.736(5)(b)(1)(c) — 1 case

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Baum Chiropractic, P.A. (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

— 627.736(5)(b)(3) — 1 case

Clearview Imaging v. State Farm Mut. Auto., 932 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

— 627.736(5)(b)(5) — 6 cases

Atlanta Cas. Co. v. Open Mri of Pinellas, 911 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Clearview Imaging v. State Farm Mut. Auto., 932 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Bristol West Ins. Co. v. MD Readers, Inc., 52 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. West Gables Open Mri Servs., Inc., 846 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Progressive Auto Pro v. One Stop Med., 985 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

— 627.736(5)(b)(6) — 1 case

Dep't of Health v. Merritt, 919 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

— 627.736(5)(b)(l) — 1 case

GEICO Gen. Ins. v. Tarpon Total Health Care, 86 So. 3d 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

— 627.736(5)(b)(l)(b) — 3 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Physicians Grp. of Sarasota, L.L.C., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2014).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. A & J Med. Ctr., Inc., 20 F. Supp. 3d 1363 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Nodal v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co., 50 So. 3d 721 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

— 627.736(5)(b)(l)(e) — 1 case

DWFII Corp. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 271 F.R.D. 676 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

— 627.736(5)(c) — 8 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Pressley, 28 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pinnacle Med., Inc., 753 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2000).

Florida Med. & Injury Ctr., Inc. v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 29 So. 3d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Usaa Cas. Ins. Co. Vs Christos Mikrogiannakis (Fla. 5th DCA 2022).

— 627.736(5)(c)(1) — 2 cases

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Garrido, 990 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Usaa Cas. Ins. Co. Vs Christos Mikrogiannakis (Fla. 5th DCA 2022).

— 627.736(5)(c)(2) — 1 case

— 627.736(5)(c)(l) — 1 case

GEICO Gen. Ins. v. Tarpon Total Health Care, 86 So. 3d 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

— 627.736(5)(c)(l)(a) — 1 case

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Chiropractic Clinics of South Florida, Pl, a/a/o Michael Akins (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

— 627.736(5)(d) — 22 cases

USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Pembroke Pines MRI, Inc., 31 So. 3d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Pressley, 28 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Ortega v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 847 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Kingsway Amigo Ins. Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc., 63 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Perez, 111 So. 3d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

— 627.736(5)(e) — 3 cases

Florida Med. & Injury Ctr., Inc. v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 29 So. 3d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Ortega v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 847 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Prof'l Med. Grp., Inc., 26 So. 3d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

— 627.736(5)(e)(9) — 1 case

Florida Med. & Injury Ctr., Inc. v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 29 So. 3d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

— 627.736(5)(h) — 1 case

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Fam. Practice & Rehab, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2019).

— 627.736(6) — 14 cases

Shaw v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 37 So. 3d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. Rural/Metro Corp., 994 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc., 210 So. 3d 1224 (Fla. 2017).

Mri Serv. Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., Co., 807 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Kaminester v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 775 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

— 627.736(6)(b) — 16 cases

Shaw v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 37 So. 3d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Tampa Chiropractic Ctr., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 141 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).

Med. Ctr. of the Palm Beaches v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 202 So. 3d 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc., 210 So. 3d 1224 (Fla. 2017).

Kaminester v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 775 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

— 627.736(6)(c) — 9 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc., 210 So. 3d 1224 (Fla. 2017).

Millennium Diagnostic Imaging Ctr., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 129 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Kaminester v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 775 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins., 117 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 2013).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Delray Med. Ctr., Inc., 178 So. 3d 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

— 627.736(6)(d) — 6 cases

GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. FEP, 972 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Prof'l Med. Grp. v. United Auto., 967 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Florida Emergency Physicians, 972 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

S. Grp. Indem. v. Humanitary Health, 975 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Florida Emergency Physicians, 978 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

— 627.736(6)(e) — 1 case

Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 213 So. 3d 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

— 627.736(6)(g) — 6 cases

Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins., 117 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 2013).

Miracle Health Servs., Inc., a/a/o Kirenia Tamayo v. Progressive Select Ins. Co. (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Infinity Auto Ins. Co. v. Miami Open Mri, LLC a/a/o Rolando Amador (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).

Merly Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 726 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2013).

Universal X Rays Corp., A/A/O Miguel Larosa-Ferrer v. United Auto. Ins. Co. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

— 627.736(7) — 30 cases

Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 2010). “2000) (indicating that attendance at a PIP medical examination is a condition precedent to the receipt of subsequent PIP benefits and that section 627.736 contemplates “a situation .”

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001). “[ [4] ] § 627.736, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added).”

Cruz v. Union Gen. Ins., 586 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Cimino v. US SEC. Ins. Co., 715 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

— 627.736(7)(A) — 1 case

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Garrido, 21 So. 3d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

— 627.736(7)(a) — 48 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rhodes & Anderson, D.C., P.A., 18 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bermudez, 980 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

United Auto. Ins. v. Millennium Diagnostic Imaging Ctr., Inc., 12 So. 3d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

— 627.736(7)(b) — 15 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Curran, 83 So. 3d 793 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

State v. Mark Marks, PA, 698 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1997).

Tindall v. Allstate Ins. Co., 472 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

— 627.736(8) — 33 cases

William Joyce v. Federated Nat'l Ins. Co., 228 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 2017).

Nichols v. State Farm Mut., 851 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

US SEC. Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 808 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2001). “[ [4] ] § 627.736, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added).”

— 627.736(9) — 2 cases

State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co v. Care Wellness Ctr., LLC, a/a/o Virginia Bardon-diaz, 240 So. 3d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Salgado, 22 So. 3d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

— 627.736(9)(a) — 1 case

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Salgado, 22 So. 3d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

— 627.736(b) — 4 cases

US SEC. Ins. Co. v. Cimino, 754 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 2000).

January v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 838 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Custer Med. Ctr., 990 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

United Auto. Ins. Co., Etc. v. G & O Rehab. Ctr., Inc., a/a/o Miredy Dieguez Moreno (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).

— 627.736(b)(1) — 1 case

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Fam. Practice & Rehab, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2019).

— 627.736(d) — 1 case

Baker Fam. Chiropractic, LLC a/a/o Hahn Dinh Vs Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. (Fla. 5th DCA 2023).

— 627.736(e) — 1 case

Koehnen v. Allstate Ins., 16 Fla. Supp. 2d 103 (Fla. Orange Cty. Ct. 1985).

— 627.736(l)(a) — 27 cases

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 141 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 2013). “§ 627.736, Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis supplied).”

Kingsway Amigo Ins. Co. v. Ocean Health, Inc., 63 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Geico Indem. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. Eduardo J. Garrido D.C. P.A., Etc., 211 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

— 627.736(l)(a)(3) — 2 cases

Med. Ctr. of the Palm Beaches v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 202 So. 3d 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. Eduardo J. Garrido D.C. P.A., Etc., 211 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

— 627.736(l)(a)(4) — 1 case

Med. Ctr. of the Palm Beaches v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 202 So. 3d 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

— 627.736(l)(b) — 6 cases

Robin Tucker, As Assignee of Palm Beach Nightclub Enter., Inc. v. John Galt Ins. Agency, 743 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Dye v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 89 F. Supp. 3d 1332 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. Eduardo J. Garrido D.C. P.A., Etc., 211 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Diaz v. South Carolina Ins. Co., 397 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Halfhill v. Progressive Am. Ins., 32 Fla. Supp. 2d 33 (Fla. Volusia Cty. Ct. 1988).

— 627.736(l)(c) — 2 cases

Mercury Ins. Co. v. Emergency Physicians of Cent., 182 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. Eduardo J. Garrido D.C. P.A., Etc., 211 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

— 627.736(ll)(a) — 3 cases

Am. Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 2011).

MRI Assocs. of Am., LLC v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 61 So. 3d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Bristol West Ins. Co. v. MD Readers, Inc., 52 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

— 627.736(ll)(d) — 1 case

— 627.736(ll)(e) — 2 cases

Am. Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 2011).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.