Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 629.111 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 629.111 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 629.111

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 629
RECIPROCAL INSURERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 629.111
629.111 Modifications.Modifications of the terms of the subscribers’ agreement or of the power of attorney of a domestic reciprocal insurer shall be made jointly by the attorney and the subscribers’ advisory committee. No such modification shall be effective retroactively, nor as to any insurance contract issued prior thereto.
History.s. 681, ch. 59-205; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 681, 809(1st), ch. 82-243; ss. 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 629.111 on Google Scholar

F.S. 629.111 on Casetext

Amendments to 629.111


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 629.111
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 629.111.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 629.111

Total Results: 11

State v. James H. Watson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-03-07

Citation: 187 So. 3d 349, 2016 WL 916832

Snippet: See California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991) (holding that

State v. Flowers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-09-19

Citation: 147 So. 3d 658, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14600, 2014 WL 4648417

Snippet: See California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 626, 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547,113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991) (finding that

State v. Law

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-04-24

Citation: 112 So. 3d 611, 2013 WL 1748995, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6572

Snippet: caught. California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991). Here, the

State v. Leonard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-12-19

Citation: 103 So. 3d 998, 2012 WL 6602780, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21665

Snippet: See California v. *1001Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991); see also Perez

Austin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-09-28

Citation: 965 So. 2d 853, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15176, 2007 WL 2811597

Snippet: denied.” California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991); see also State

State v. Battis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-03-24

Citation: 926 So. 2d 427, 2006 WL 739537

Snippet: he was not seized until he was tackled." Id. at 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547. See also Perez v. State, 620 So.2d

Cooks v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-05-11

Citation: 901 So. 2d 963, 2005 WL 1105213

Snippet: he tossed away the contraband. See 499 U.S. at 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547. Here, Cooks was seized when he was

State v. K.W.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-09-30

Citation: 832 So. 2d 803, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14194, 2002 WL 31159445

Snippet: chase, it was not a fruit of the seizure. Id. at 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547. Likewise, in the present case, before

State v. Canada

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-08-28

Citation: 715 So. 2d 1164, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11013, 1998 WL 543365

Snippet: does not yield, is not a seizure. Id. 499 U.S. at 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547. In Hodari D., for example, the Supreme

Washington v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-24

Citation: 685 So. 2d 858, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305

Snippet: suppression. See California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 1552, 113 L.Ed.2d 690, 699 (1991);

Washington v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-24

Citation: 685 So. 2d 858, 1996 WL 274135

Snippet: suppression. See California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 1552, 113 L.Ed.2d 690, 699 (1991);