Florida Statute 632.638 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 632
FRATERNAL BENEFIT SOCIETIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 632.638

632.638 Applicability of other code provisions.—In addition to other provisions contained or referred to in this chapter, the following chapters and provisions of this code apply to fraternal benefit societies, to the extent applicable and not in conflict with the express provisions of this chapter and the reasonable implications thereof:

(1) Part I of chapter 624;

(2) Part II of chapter 624;

(3) Sections 624.404, 624.415, 624.416, 624.418, 624.420, 624.421, 624.4211, 624.422, and 624.423;

(4) Section 624.501;

(5) Part I of chapter 626;

(6) Part III of chapter 626;

(7) Part IV of chapter 626;

(8) Sections 626.901-626.912;

(9) Part VIII of chapter 626, subject to the limitations set forth in former s. 632.341;

(10) Section 627.424;

(11) Section 627.4301;

(12) Section 627.479; and

(13) Part I of chapter 631.

History.—ss. 4, 6, ch. 86-140; s. 44, ch. 88-166; s. 20, ch. 90-119; s. 184, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 3, ch. 97-182; s. 26, ch. 2023-15.

F.S. 632.638 on Google Scholar

F.S. 632.638 on Casetext

Amendments to 632.638

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 632.638

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 632.638.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 632.638

Total Results: 12

Jardines v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-04-14

Citation: 73 So. 3d 34, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 147, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 884, 2011 WL 1405080

Snippet: search); United States v. Lingenfelter, 997 F.2d 632, 638 (9th Cir.1993) (holding that dog sniff of warehouse

Smith v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-08-13

Citation: 41 So. 3d 1081, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11772, 2010 WL 3184348

Snippet: at 1304 (quoting Harrell v. Israel, 672 F.2d 632, 638 (7th Cir.1982)). Jackson is factually distinguishable

Stabler v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-26

Citation: 990 So. 2d 1258, 2008 WL 4361853

Snippet: see also United States v. Lingenfelter, 997 F.2d 632, 638 (9th Cir.1993) ("Because Thomas rests on an incorrect

State v. Rabb

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-06-23

Citation: 881 So. 2d 587, 2004 WL 1392339

Snippet: search); United States v. Lingenfelter, 997 F.2d 632, 638 (9th Cir.1993) (reasoning that Thomas conflicts

Langston v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-04-20

Citation: 789 So. 2d 1024, 2001 WL 395171

Snippet: presumed correct. See Shimek v. State, 610 So.2d 632, 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Appellant has the burden

Simmons v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-02-28

Citation: 780 So. 2d 263, 2000 WL 33188170

Snippet: evidence before them." Shimek v. State, 610 So.2d 632, 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). "When an instruction excludes

Clemente v. Horne

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-03-04

Citation: 707 So. 2d 865, 1998 WL 88383

Snippet: Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. DeGrio, 454 So.2d 632, 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), decision approved, 484 So

Herzog v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-22

Citation: 439 So. 2d 1372, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3215

Snippet: on this issue. Cf. Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632, 638 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911, 96 S.Ct

Herzog v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-22

Citation: 439 So. 2d 1372

Snippet: on this issue. Cf. Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632, 638 (Fla. 1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911, 96 S

State Department of Transportation v. Myers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-06-30

Citation: 237 So. 2d 257, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6143

Snippet: should be granted.’ Lewis’ Em. Dom. § 601; 20 C.J. 632-638.” With the foregoing basic principles in mind,

Robertson v. Brooksville & Inverness Railway

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-07-19

Citation: 129 So. 582, 100 Fla. 195

Snippet: should be granted.' Lewis' Em. Dom. 601; 20 C. J. 632-638." We must conclude, therefore, that the exceptions

Wilton v. County St. Johns

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-06-13

Citation: 123 So. 527, 98 Fla. 26

Snippet: granted." Lewis' Em. Dom., Sec. 601; 20 C. J. 632-638. Sections 2281 et seq., Comp. Gen. Laws, 1503