Florida Statute 633.138 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 633
FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 633.138

633.138 Notice of change of address of record; notice of felony actions.—

(1) Any individual issued a license, permit, or certificate under this chapter shall notify the division in writing of any changes to her or his current mailing address, e-mail address, and place of practice as specified in rule adopted by the division.

(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, delivery by regular mail or e-mail to a licensee, permittee, or certificateholder, using the last known mailing address or e-mail address on record with the division, constitutes adequate and sufficient notice to the licensee, permittee, or certificateholder of any official communication by the division.

(3) Any individual issued a license, permit, or certificate under this chapter shall notify the division in writing within 30 days after pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, or being convicted or found guilty of, any felony or a crime punishable by imprisonment of 1 year or more under the law of the United States or of any state thereof, or under the law of any other country, without regard to whether a judgment of conviction has been entered by the court having jurisdiction of the case.

History.—s. 18, ch. 2013-183.

F.S. 633.138 on Google Scholar

F.S. 633.138 on Casetext

Amendments to 633.138

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 633.138

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 633.138.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 633.138

Total Results: 20

Roberto Basulto v. Hialeah Automotive, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-03-20

Citation: 141 So. 3d 1145, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 140, 2014 WL 1057334, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1051

Snippet: (quoting Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44, 46 (1931)). “Un-conscionability has generally

Hialeah Automotive, LLC v. Basulto

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-28

Citation: 22 So. 3d 586, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 566, 2009 WL 187584

Snippet: (citing Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44, 46 (1931)). Judge Hubbart explained that

Belcher v. Kier

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-02-02

Citation: 558 So. 2d 1039, 1990 WL 7521

Snippet: enforce, Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, [103 Fla. 633,] 138 So. 44, 46 (Fla. 1931), because: (1) The lot rental

Doc's Junkie Musick, Inc. v. Active Alarms, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-06-28

Citation: 545 So. 2d 500, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1552, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3573, 1989 WL 69161

Snippet: DCA 1977); Peacock Hotel v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44 (1931). I respectfully dissent.

Fotomat Corp. of Fla. v. Chanda

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-28

Citation: 464 So. 2d 626, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 525

Snippet: stupidity. Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44 (1931). Decisions in Florida since the

Capital Associates, Inc. v. Hudgens

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-08-15

Citation: 455 So. 2d 651, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 66

Snippet: See, e.g., Peacock Hotel v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44, 46 (1931), where the Supreme Court stated

Steinhardt v. Rudolph

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-08-17

Citation: 422 So. 2d 884

Snippet: carelessness." Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44, 46 (1931). Stated differently, "[i]f a

Carnell v. Carnell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-05-27

Citation: 398 So. 2d 503

Snippet: carelessness. Peacock Hotel v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44 (1931). "The freedom to contract includes

Dept. of Business Regulation v. NAT. MANUFACTURED HOUSING FEDERATION, INC.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-04-26

Citation: 370 So. 2d 1132, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4650

Snippet: e.g., Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44 (1931); Point East One Condominium Corp

Point East One Condominium v. POINT EAST, ETC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-06-28

Citation: 348 So. 2d 32, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16279

Snippet: general rule in Peacock Hotel v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44 (1931), for the proposition that where

Tonkovich v. South Florida Citrus Industries, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-09-20

Citation: 202 So. 2d 579, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4293

Snippet: Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 1931, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44; Columbus Hotel Corp. v. Hotel Management

Fishman v. Thompson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-12-28

Citation: 181 So. 2d 604, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3660

Snippet: (1939). . Peacock Hotel v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44 (1931). . Id. . 99 Fla. 795, 128 So

Blakely v. Yelvington

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-10-08

Citation: 156 So. 2d 676

Snippet: 59 So. 133; Peacock Hotel v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44; Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers’ Ass’n

Johns v. Puca

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-07-20

Citation: 143 So. 2d 568, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3087

Snippet: See Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 144. The harshness created by granting to

Rood Company v. BD. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE CTY.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-04-09

Citation: 102 So. 2d 139, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1731

Snippet: Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 1931, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44; Columbus Hotel Corp. v. Hotel Management

Robson Link & Co. v. Leedy Wheeler & Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-06-13

Citation: 18 So. 2d 523, 154 Fla. 596, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 768

Snippet: So. 225; Peacock Hotel Co. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44; Geo. E. Sebring Co. v. Skinner, 100 Fla

Van Woy v. Willis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-06-18

Citation: 14 So. 2d 185, 153 Fla. 189, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 585

Snippet: 326; Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44, and Duvall v. Walton, 107 Fla. 60, 144

Farnham v. Blount

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-08-04

Citation: 11 So. 2d 785, 152 Fla. 208, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 727

Snippet: Peacock Hotel Inc., et al., v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633,138 So. 44, involved the foreclosure of purchase price

Metcalf v. Leedy, Wheeler & Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-09-29

Citation: 191 So. 690, 140 Fla. 149, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1071

Snippet: down in Peacock Hotel, Inc., v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 So. 44, and Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers'

McCaskill Investment Co. v. Green

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-11-10

Citation: 150 So. 735, 112 Fla. 634, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2328

Snippet: authority of Peacock Hotel Co. v. Shipman, 103 Fla. 633, 138 Sou. Rep.44 (second headnote), and kindred cases