Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 636.019 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 636.019 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 636.019

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 636
PREPAID LIMITED HEALTH SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS AND DISCOUNT PLAN ORGANIZATIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 636.019
636.019 Additional contract contents.A prepaid limited health services contract may contain additional provisions not inconsistent with this act which are:
(1) Necessary because of the manner in which the organization is constituted or operated in order to state the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract; or
(2) Desired by the organization and neither prohibited by law nor in conflict with any provisions required to be included.
History.s. 16, ch. 93-148.

F.S. 636.019 on Google Scholar

F.S. 636.019 on Casetext

Amendments to 636.019


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 636.019
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 636.019.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 636.019

Total Results: 3

Manning v. Clark

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1951-12-11

Citation: 56 So. 2d 521, 1951 Fla. LEXIS 1019

Snippet: Jacksonville v. Simpson, 136 Fla. 809, 188 So. 636; 19 Am.Jur. 109; 30 C.J.S., Equity, § 20, p. 339. With

State Ex Rel. Cochran v. Lewis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-02-28

Citation: 159 So. 792, 118 Fla. 536

Snippet: Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. 112 N.Y. 325, 2 L.R.A. 636, 19 N.E. 625; Klotz v. Angle, 220 N.Y. 347, 358, 116

City of Tampa v. Tampa Waterworks Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 600

Snippet: Savings Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 530; Louisville Wa*628ter Co. v.