Florida Statute 636.045 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 636
PREPAID LIMITED HEALTH SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS AND DISCOUNT PLAN ORGANIZATIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 636.045

636.045 Minimum surplus requirements.—

(1) Each prepaid limited health service organization must at all times maintain a minimum surplus in an amount which is the greater of $150,000 or 10 percent of total liabilities.

(2) The office may not issue a certificate of authority unless the prepaid limited health service organization has a minimum surplus in an amount of $150,000 or 10 percent of liabilities, whichever is the greater amount.

(3) A prepaid limited health service organization that is authorized in this state and one or more other states, jurisdictions, or countries is subject to ss. 624.4085 and 624.40851.

History.—s. 36, ch. 93-148; s. 21, ch. 2000-209; s. 1539, ch. 2003-261; s. 15, ch. 2014-101.

F.S. 636.045 on Google Scholar

F.S. 636.045 on Casetext

Amendments to 636.045

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 636.045

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 636.045.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 636.045

Total Results: 3

SEAN PATRICK EMKE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-09-18T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: departure, was 636.45 months in prison. The trial court sentenced Mr. Emke to 636.45 months in prison… appeals the imposition of a prison sentence of 636.45 months. While serving probation on a prior case

Bedenbaugh v. Lawrence

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1940-01-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 193 So. 74, 141 Fla. 341, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1520

Snippet: stockholder. Green v. Sigua Iron Co., 22 C.C.A. 636, 45 U.S. App. 162, 207, 76 Fed. 947; Carey v. Williams

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Taylor

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1908-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 56 Fla. 788

Snippet: . Taylor v Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 54 Fla. 636, 45 South. Rep. 574. The former appeal w|as taken by