Florida Statute 641.43 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 641
HEALTH CARE SERVICE PROGRAMS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 641.43

641.43 Provider contracts.—Whenever a prepaid health clinic provides services to subscribers through an arrangement with a provider, there shall be a written contract with the provider. The contract shall include a provision that, if the prepaid health clinic fails to meet its obligation to pay fees for services already rendered by the provider to a subscriber, the prepaid health clinic and not the subscriber is liable for the payment of such fees.

History.—ss. 10, 11, ch. 84-313; ss. 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 641.43 on Google Scholar

F.S. 641.43 on Casetext

Amendments to 641.43

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 641.43

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 641.43.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 641.43

Total Results: 4

Enoch v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-07-27

Citation: 95 So. 3d 344, 2012 WL 3047313, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12275

Snippet: “strict scrutiny” standard. Turner, 512 U.S. at 641-43, 114 S.Ct. 2445. A statute survives scrutiny if

Arbelaez v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-01-27

Citation: 898 So. 2d 25, 2005 WL 168570

Snippet: murder victim. See Hertz v. State, 803 So.2d 629, 641-43 (Fla.2001) (finding no abuse of discretion where

Burger v. Burger

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-12-10

Citation: 862 So. 2d 828, 2003 WL 22900218

Snippet: would be in the best interests of the child. Id. at 641-43. Significantly, a custody modification will not

Martinez v. Schiffman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-09-01

Citation: 402 So. 2d 605, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21018

Snippet: Liability for Tenant’s Vicious Pet, 81 A.L.R.3d 638, 641-43 (1977). Compare, Uccello v. Laudenslayer, 44 Cal