Florida Statute 694.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 694
CERTAIN CONVEYANCES MADE VALID

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 694.10

694.10 Certain titles not affected.—Nothing in s. 694.08 contained shall be taken or held to validate or perfect any title to any land as against one or more in adverse possession thereof or holding or claiming title under a different or adverse chain of title from either a common or different source.

History.—s. 3, ch. 10169, 1925; CGL 5697.

F.S. 694.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 694.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 694.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 694.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 694.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 694.10

Total Results: 20

Nolden v. Summit Fin. Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-25

Citation: 244 So. 3d 322

Snippet: financed" including cash price of the car ($11,694.10); the buyer's down payment ($2,500); and "other

ADRIANNE NOLDEN v. SUMMIT FINANCIAL CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-25

Snippet: financed” including cash price of the car ($11,694.10); the buyer’s down payment ($2,500); and “other

State v. Slifer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-03-22

Citation: 447 So. 2d 433, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12391

Snippet: [436] at 475, [86 S.Ct. 1602 at 1628], 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 Ohio Misc. 9, 36 Ohio Ops.2d 237, 10 A.L. R.3d

Tindall v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-03-18

Citation: 395 So. 2d 289, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18942

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L. R.3d 974 (1966). The objection was proper

Washington v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-06-04

Citation: 388 So. 2d 1042, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16380

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L. R.3d 974 (1966); Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610

Daley v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-21

Citation: 387 So. 2d 971, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16215

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966). Finally, the trial court justified

State v. Dixon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-05-04

Citation: 348 So. 2d 333

Snippet: ' 384 U.S., at 479 [86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 Ohio Misc. 9, 36 Ohio Ops.2d 237, 10 A.L.R.3d 974

Halliwell v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-12-03

Citation: 323 So. 2d 557

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966). [2] 274 So.2d 519 (Fla. 1973)

Sheppard v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-11-18

Citation: 322 So. 2d 628, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18831

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966). The argument that the statement

Nowlin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-01-10

Citation: 320 So. 2d 468, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15455

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 ALR 3d 974 (1966). The statements were obtained

McDougald v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-03-28

Citation: 275 So. 2d 259, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7032

Snippet: 1966, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974, the court stated: ‘If the individual

Retherford v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-07-06

Citation: 265 So. 2d 80, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6379

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966). . Harris v. New York, 401

Zerega v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-03-15

Citation: 260 So. 2d 1, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3872

Snippet: Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 *4A.L.R.3d 974), Jones v. State (200 So.2d 574

Wright v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-09-07

Citation: 251 So. 2d 890

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974. [2] Jones v. State, 200 So.2d 574

Wakeman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-06-29

Citation: 237 So. 2d 61

Snippet: 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974, the court stated: "If the individual

Young v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-04-22

Citation: 234 So. 2d 341

Snippet: NOTES [1] 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966). [2] 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct

Collins v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-01-26

Citation: 230 So. 2d 711, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7047

Snippet: 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974, and therefore the test to be applied

Simmons v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-10-10

Citation: 227 So. 2d 84, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5034

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed. 2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966). The Detective testified that

Howard v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-10-01

Citation: 230 So. 2d 1, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2521

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966), which decision establishes

Burroughs v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-04-09

Citation: 221 So. 2d 159

Snippet: Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966). Mr. Justice Thornal's dissent