Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 723.025 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 723.025 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 723.025

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 723
MOBILE HOME PARK LOT TENANCIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 723.025
723.025 Park owner’s access to mobile home and mobile home lot.—A mobile home park owner has no right of access to a mobile home unless the mobile home owner’s prior written consent has been obtained or unless to prevent imminent danger to an occupant of the mobile home or to the mobile home. Such consent may be revoked in writing by the mobile home owner at any time. The park owner has, however, the right of entry onto the lot for purposes of repair and replacement of utilities and protection of the mobile home park at all reasonable times, but not in such manner or at such time as to interfere unreasonably with the mobile home owner’s quiet enjoyment of the lot.
History.—s. 1, ch. 84-80.

F.S. 723.025 on Google Scholar

F.S. 723.025 on Casetext

Amendments to 723.025


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 723.025
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 723.025.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 723.025

Total Results: 5

BAM Trading Services, Inc., D/B/A Binance.US v. State of Florida, Office of Financial Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-17

Snippet: “uncertainty” are unfounded. Cf. Gamble, 587 U.S. at 723–25 (Thomas, J., concurring) (speaking to the concerns

Butler v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-04-03

Citation: 842 So. 2d 817, 2003 WL 1786712

Snippet: Sixth Amendment dictates of Ring." See 833 So.2d at 723-25. [13] In Cardona, the facts underlying HAC revealed

Gross v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-14

Citation: 765 So. 2d 39, 2000 WL 966714

Snippet: concurring opinion in Boyd v. State, 578 So.2d 718, 723-25 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1991), I concur with the majority's

Danieli Corp. v. Bryant

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-05-27

Citation: 399 So. 2d 387

Snippet: July 26, 1975 on each note in the amount of $238,723.25, for a total principal payment of $954,893 annually

Pippin v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-10-07

Citation: 136 So. 883, 102 Fla. 1124

Snippet: Indictments (2d Ed.) p. 1005; 16 Enc. of Forms, p. 723-25; 9 Standard Enc. of Procedure, p. 1103. The evidence